Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.92
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Agroekotek View International Journal of Law and Society International Journal of Sociology and Law
Saniah Saniah
Unknown Affiliation
Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
Kemanjuran Beberapa Ekstrak Pestisida Nabati Terhadap Hama Wereng Coklat (Nilaparvata lugens Stall) Saniah Saniah; Samharinto Samharinto; Nofia Hardarani
Agroekotek View Vol 2, No 1 (2019)
Publisher : Universitas Lambung Mangkurat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20527/agtview.v2i1.709

Abstract

Planthopper pests are very harmful rice pests that attack on the vegetative phase. Vegetable pesticide is one of the alternative of brown planthopper pest control. Vegetable pesticides are relatively easier to make, easier to decompose in nature and safer for humans and the environment. This research used Single Randomized Complete Random Design (RAL) with ten treatment of vegetable pesticide solution type from nine plants, namely: bintaro leaf, galam leaf, kirinyuh leaf, mimba leaf, kepayang leaf, jeruju leaf, sungkai leaf and husk stem . The results showed that all of the vegetable pesticide solution used could cause the death intensity of brown planthoppers more than 80%.
WIFE BEATING IN SOCIAL AND LEGAL PERSPECTIVE IN INDONESIA Noni Zulkarnain; Dian Rizki; Sri Istiawati; Saniah Saniah
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 22 No. 3 (2023): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v22i3.3954

Abstract

This study aims to determine the act of wife beating according to the views or perspectives of sociology and law in Indonesia and also to find out the thoughts and understanding of Law Number 23 of 2004 concerning the Elimination of Domestic Violence in terms of loading on sanctions for perpetrators of wife beating. The techniques used in data collection through normative research and social aspects are further methods of collecting matari and literature data from, legislation, and various reading sources with national and international integration, used analysis techniques in qualitative form. The conclusion obtained is that in terms of sociology and law in Indonesia the act of beating a wife is an act that is prohibited both in terms of sociology and law, but in the application in society there is still a development of misunderstanding and ignorance in this matter. In solving the problem, the presence of regulations of Law No. 23 of 2004 concerning the Elimination of Domestic Violence is not only seen, read and heard but also implemented properly, because it requires a combination of personal and social matters, and is supported by a strict legal system in taking action against the perpetrator, providing very strict legal sanctions and also appropriate for those who commit acts of wife beating in society so as to create a fair, peaceful and safe quality of life.                                                       
Legal Protection For Wife As A Victim Of Domestic Violence Based On Law No. 23 Of 2004 On The Elimination Of Domestic Violence Saniah Saniah
International Journal of Law and Society Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025): International Journal of Law and Society
Publisher : Asosiasi Penelitian dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62951/ijls.v2i1.320

Abstract

This study discusses domestic violence, especially against wives, after the issuance of Law No. 23 of 2004 concerning "Elimination of Domestic Violence.” This study aimed to determine the protection of wives as victims of domestic violence. The research method used was normative legal research, using primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. Library research was conducted to collect legal materials. The conclusion that can be put forward is that Law No. 23 of 2004 has normatively provided protection to victims or wives, but it is still not comprehensive, and there are still forms of protection that require more detailed explanation or description.
Legal Review of Legal Protection for Communities Affected by Land Acquisition for Public Interest under Law No. 2 of 2012 on Land Acquisition for Development in the Public Interest Saniah Saniah
International Journal of Sociology and Law Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): August : International Journal of Sociology and Law
Publisher : Asosiasi Penelitian dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62951/ijsl.v2i3.710

Abstract

This research examines the legal protection available to communities affected by land acquisition for public interest development in Indonesia. Although governed primarily by Law No. 2 of 2012 and updated through Law No. 6 of 2023, many legal ambiguities remain, especially regarding the fairness of compensation and the recognition of informal or uncertified land rights. The objective of this study is to critically evaluate the adequacy of these legal frameworks and identify gaps that undermine justice for affected populations. Employing a normative-juridical method, the research conducts doctrinal analysis, comparative law review (with cases from Malaysia and India), and stakeholder consultation to assess both the text and implementation of relevant laws. The study finds that key legal concepts such as “fair and appropriate compensation” remain undefined in statute, leading to inconsistent application across regions. Furthermore, compensation mechanisms such as share ownership and resettlement are inadequately regulated and poorly implemented. The findings emphasize the disparity between normative intent and administrative reality, particularly for holders of uncertified land. By integrating stakeholder feedback with normative evaluation, the research proposes actionable reforms to strengthen legal protection and uphold constitutional guarantees under Article 28H. In conclusion, while Indonesia has made progress in establishing a framework for public interest land acquisition, significant doctrinal and institutional reforms are required to ensure equitable outcomes for all landholders.
Co-Authors Dian Rizki Nofia Hardarani Noni Zulkarnain Samharinto Samharinto Sri Istiawati