Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Hukum Adigama
Rasji .
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

 1 
KEKUATAN MENGIKAT PUTUSAN AJUDIKASI BAWASLU DALAM SENGKETA PROSES PEMILU 2019 Ahmad Rizqi Robbani Kaban; Rasji .
Jurnal Hukum Adigama Vol 1, No 2 (2018): Jurnal Hukum Adigama
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Tarumanagara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24912/adigama.v1i2.2839

Abstract

The law governing general elections (elections) held every 5 years always changes. The latest is Law No.7 of 2017 (Elections Law) which accommodates 2019 Elections. In the Elections law law, the authority to resolve electoral disputes is regulated as one of the tasks of the Election Supervisory Body (Bawaslu). Bawaslu is given the authority to examine and decide on settlement of disputes through mediation if no agreement is reached then proceed to adjudication. Through this adjudication the problems occur, in the Election Law it is stated that the Bawaslu decision is final and binding. In fact, there is a decision on Bawaslu's adjudication which is not respected by the KPU. In the Election Law, the KPU is required to follow up on the decision no later than 3 (days) since the verdict was read. Instead of following up on the verdict, the KPU instead postponed following up on the verdict. Eventhough, the Election Law does not regulate the KPU's authority to delay, the KPU can only accept or reject it by making legal efforts to the Administrative Courts. So seeing the problem and being regulated by the Election Law, it is clear that the power of the Bawaslu adjudication decision is not final and binding. The Election Law must be corrected by giving firmness to the strength of the Bawaslu adjudication verdict whether it is final and binding or not.
ANALISIS PENERAPAN WILAYAH KERJA PPAT BERDASARKAN PERATURAN PEMERINTAH NOMOR 24 TAHUN 2016 TENTANG PERUBAHAN ATAS PERATURAN PEMERINTAH NOMOR 37 TAHUN 1998 DI PROVINSI DKI JAKARTA Ivandi Setiawan; Rasji .
Jurnal Hukum Adigama Vol 1, No 1 (2018): Jurnal Hukum Adigama
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Tarumanagara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24912/adigama.v1i1.2145

Abstract

PPAT is a public official authorized to make authentic deeds concerning certain legal acts concerning the right to land or the Property Right of the Flats Unit. Government Regulation No. 24 of 2016 is the latest regulation made by the government to regulate provisions on PPAT. in Government Regulation No. 24 of 2016 in Article 12 paragraph one explained that the scope of work area of PPAT is expanded into one province where in the previous regulation that is government regulation number 37 year 1998 explained that the scope of work of PPAT is only limited to district only. but the fact is now the government regulation number 24 of 2016 has not been applied efficiently, especially in terms of the scope of work of PPAT, it happens because of several factors that hamper causing the loss of effectiveness in Article 12 Paragraph one of Government Regulation No. 24 of 2016 . it is of course also contrary to the legal certainty that the public should have legal certainty with the enactment of the government regulation number 24 of 2016 by the government then the regulation should be applicable in the scope of the working area of PPAT should be applicable in practice in the community. contrary to lex posterior derogate legi priori principle which explains that in the same rules the new rules can replace the old rules. the approach used in this study using the approach of law.
KAJIAN HUKUM TERHADAP PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG ATAS PERKARA NO.825K/PDT.SUS-PHI/2015 TENTANG PEMUTUSAN HUBUNGAN KERJA KARENA ALASAN EFISIENSI Andika Pramana Putra; Rasji .
Jurnal Hukum Adigama Vol 1, No 1 (2018): Jurnal Hukum Adigama
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Tarumanagara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24912/adigama.v1i1.2166

Abstract

At this time layoffs for efficiency reasons are still a polemic because there are two different interpretations caused by the provisions of Article 164 Paragraph (3) of the Manpower Law. This raises problems in Manpower so it needs to be investigated in this paper is whether in case No.825K / Pdt.Sus-PHI / 2015 has been in accordance with the efficiency criteria set by Law Number 13 Year 2003 on Manpower. The research method used in this writing is the method of normative legal research. Based on the results of the analysis that layoffs for efficient reasons is one of the reasons of the many causes of layoffs provided for in Article 164 of the Manpower Act. In the case of No.825K / Pdt.Sus-PHI / 2015, the layoffs made by PT. PG. Gorontalo Unit PG. Tolangohula, to employees of Cindra Husain is not in accordance with the provisions set forth in Article 164 paragraph (3) of the Manpower Act specifically regulating the Amount of Severance Pay as it does not take into account the Wages of Workers during the Court proceedings. This is corroborated by the Supreme Court Judge declining the appeal of the cassation and the company is considered to have committed acts contrary to the Manpower Act.
PENERAPAN ASAS ERGA OMNES DALAM PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 30/PUU-XVI/2018 DIKAITKAN DENGAN ASAS NEGATIVE LEGISLATOR Muchamad Lutfi Hakim; Rasji .
Jurnal Hukum Adigama Vol 1, No 2 (2018): Jurnal Hukum Adigama
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Tarumanagara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24912/adigama.v1i2.2924

Abstract

The problem began because there was an Application to Judicial Review Article 182 Letter l specifically in the phrase "other work" Law Number 7 of 2017. The applicant requested the Constitutional Court to interpret the phrase "other work". The request was finally granted by the Constitutional Court which interpreted the phrase "other work" in Article 182 letter l of the Act to also serve as a Political Party Functionary. For the Decision, there are Parties who disagree, finally the KPU Regulation Number 26 Year 2018 which accommodates the MK Decision so that candidates for DPD members resign from Political Parties to the Administrative Court and MA. The problem is that the Decision of the Administrative Court and Supreme Court is different from the Constitutional Court Decision, both decisions allow political party functionaries to register as candidates for the DPD. In solving these problems the author uses the Normative Legal Research Method, the author's conclusion is that the principle of the Erga Omnes and the principle of the Negative legislator attached to the Constitutional Court Decision is not effective. While the author's suggestion is that there is a need for a revision of the Constitutional Court Law by adding sanctions to institutions or communities that do not follow the MK Decision.
PERLINDUNGAN HAK WARGA NEGARA ATAS LINGKUNGAN HIDUP YANG SEHAT DIKAITKAN DENGAN MANFAAT PENERIMAAN NEGARA DARI PRODUKSI ROKOK Billy Samuel; Rasji .
Jurnal Hukum Adigama Vol 1, No 1 (2018): Jurnal Hukum Adigama
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Tarumanagara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24912/adigama.v1i1.2206

Abstract

Cigarettes is a culture that has existed since time immemorial and has come down to the heir of the nation to this day, cigarettes which initially is a habit that is done to fill the vacuum of time, has now turned into something that makes people dependence on cigarettes. Therefore based on the 1945 Constitution of the State of the Republic of Indonesia in Article 28H paragraph (1) states that the right of citizens to obtain a good and healthy environment, and get good health services, need to be regulated further about health, especially the imposition cigarette. Now cigarettes that use tobacco which is one of addictive substances, has been regulated further by Law Number 36 Year 2009 About Health which is one of the realization of the ideals of the Constitution Article 28H Paragraph (1). However, control isn’t enough, in fact the government only carries the imposition of excise products that containing addictive substances. The research method used is normative legal research method that comes from primary, secondary, and supported by interview with related experts, which is analyzed deductively. In addition, the theory of the legal system not only refers to the substance of the law but also supported the legal culture that is more directed to the attitude of society, public confidence, values adopted by society and their ideas or expectations that determine how the legal system to obtain a place that is appropriate and acceptable to citizens within the framework of better society culture for Indonesia.
Co-Authors Ahmad Rizqi Robbani Kaban Andika Pramana Putra Billy Samuel Ivandi Setiawan Muchamad Lutfi Hakim