p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.778
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Hukum Adigama
Vera W. S. Soemarwi
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

TINJAUAN PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP KONSUMEN ROKOK TANPA LABEL PERINGATAN KESEHATAN BERUPA GAMBAR BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 8 TAHUN 1999 TENTANG PERLINDUNGAN KONSUMEN (ANALISIS PUTUSAN NOMOR 410/PID.SUS/2020/PN BTM) Angela Devina; Vera W. S. Soemarwi
Jurnal Hukum Adigama Vol 4, No 2 (2021): Jurnal Hukum Adigama
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Tarumanagara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24912/adigama.v4i2.17981

Abstract

Cigarettes are currently not only known in the form of bars but also in the form of electric cigarettes or what is often also called vapor. In Indonesia, cigarettes are no longer foreign objects to be consumed but have become a habit of people to consume cigarettes. The government has tried to make various efforts to make people aware of how dangerous it is to consume cigarettes namely, the issuance of Government Regulation no. 109 of 2012 concerning the Safeguarding of Materials Containing Addictive Substances in the Form of Tobacco Products for Health, a Decree of the Head of the Food and Drug Monitoring Agency of the Republic of Indonesia (BPOM RI) is stipulated on the Procedure for Supervision of Circulating Cigarette Products and Advertising. Regarding health warnings in the form of pictures and writings that have one meaning that is printed together with the product packaging, it is very clear that it is te obligation of business actors as stated in Article 14 of Government Regulation no. 109 of 2012 and also regulated in Article 4 of Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection and Article 7 of Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection (hereinafter referred to as UUPK).
AKUMULASI KASUS PELANGGARAN HAM BERAT DI PAPUA PADA MASA KEPEMIMPINAN PRESIDEN B.J. HABIBIE S.D. SUSILO BAMBANG YUDHOYONO DALAM PERSPEKTIF HUKUM INTERNASIONAL Standy Wico; Dylan Aldianza Ramadhan; Anastasia Anastasia; Vindy Kusuma; Vivia Chandra; Vera W. S. Soemarwi
Jurnal Hukum Adigama Vol 4, No 2 (2021): Jurnal Hukum Adigama
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Tarumanagara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24912/adigama.v4i2.18026

Abstract

The government must respect the human rights of every person in Indonesia. From many islands in Indonesia, there are several areas that are given special status, one of which is Papua. The government gives privileges because Papua is an area that is located at the very end of Indonesia and is vulnerable to provocations from outsiders. Of all the presidents who have served in Indonesia, they are very focused on addressing this issue. All efforts have been made and not infrequently these efforts are contrary to the law. The forms of legal violations that occur are dominated by violations of Human Rights (HAM). Talking about human rights violations, this cannot be separated from the view of international law. The international party is a very influential party in efforts to eliminate every act of crime against humanity. The issues that will be discussed regarding the gross human rights violations that occurred in Papua during the leadership of President B.J. Habibie to President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono and the perspective of international law in cases of gross human rights violations in Papua during the leadership of President B. J. Habibie to Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono. The research method used is normative research. The gross human rights violations that occurred in Papua have met the elements of international crimes. Based on the perspective of international law, the Indonesian government is considered to be responsible for the gross human rights violations that occurred in Papua.
ANALISIS KEBIJAKAN PROGRAM RESTRUKTURISASI POLIS PT ASURANSI JIWASRAYA (PERSERO) DITINJAU DARI ASPEK PERJANJIAN (STUDI KASUS: PUTUSAN PENGADILAN NEGERI JAKARTA PUSAT NOMOR 09/PDT.G.S/2021/PN.JKT.PST) Yeremia Wijaya; Vera W. S. Soemarwi
Jurnal Hukum Adigama Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Tarumanagara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Since 2018, PT Asuransi Jiwasraya (Persero) has delayed payment of claims due to financialdif iculties. The financial condition that kept getting worse brought the oldest insurance companyin Indonesia to default. In order to overcome the default, Jiwasraya conducted a PolicyRestructuring Program. This Policy Restructuring Program basically reduces the insureds’ policyvalue. The problems raised in this research are how the legal review of the Policy RestructuringProgram of PT Asuransi Jiwasraya (Persero) based on the agreement and how the legal protectionfor the insured and/or policyholders who feel aggrieved due to the Policy Restructuring Programof PT Asuransi Jiwasraya (Persero). Meanwhile, this research is a type of normative legalresearch that is descriptive analytical based on secondary data collected and analyzed throughlibrary research. The results of this study indicate that the Policy Restructuring Program is a debtor liability restructuring which in its implementation violates the principles of agreement in theCivil Code, Commercial Code, and General Policy Conditions. Legal protection for customerswho feel aggrieved due to the Policy Restructuring Program is regulated in the ConsumerProtection Act and POJK 1/2013. Suggestions for the Financial Services Authority to makeregulations that strictly stipulate that debt or liability restructuring in insurance companies mustbe based on the agreement of both parties in accordance with the principle of agreement, while forPT Asuransi Jiwasraya (Persero) to eliminate discriminatory treatment against customers whoparticipate and do not participate the Policy Restructuring Program.
Tinjauan Perlindungan Hukum Konsumen Rokok Tanpa Label Peringatan Kesehatan Berupa Gambar Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 Tentang Perlindungan Konsumen (Putusan Nomor 410/Pid.Sus/2020/PN Btm) Angela Devina; Vera W. S. Soemarwi
Jurnal Hukum Adigama Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Tarumanagara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

In Indonesia, many business actors do commerce of various brands of cigarettes legally and illegally.Legal means that the cigarette has a distribution permit and has a health warning label in the form ofan image on the package and illegal is a cigarette that does not have a health warning label in theform of an image on the package. Where cigarettes without a health warning label in the form ofimages on the packaging are very detrimental to smokers as cigarette consumers. Various ef ortshave been made by the government such as issuing Government Regulation No. 109 of 2012concerning the Safety of Materials Containing Addictive Substances in the Form of Tobacco Productsfor Health, the Decree of the Head of the Food and Drug Supervisory Agency of the Republic ofIndonesia (BPOM RI) is regulated on Procedures for Supervision of Circulation of CigaretteProducts and Advertising. Regarding health warnings in the form of images and writings that haveone meaning printed together with product packaging, it is very clear that it is the obligation ofbusiness actors as stated in Article 14 of Government Regulation No. 109 of 2012 and also regulatedin Article 4 of Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection and Article 7 of Law Number8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection (hereinafter referred to as UUPK).