Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Hukum Adigama
Susanti Adi Nugroho
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
PELAKSANAAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 33 TAHUN 2014 TENTANG JAMINAN PRODUK HALAL TERHADAP PENDAFTARAN SERTIFIKAT HALAL PADA PRODUK MAKANAN Melissa Aulia Hosanna; Susanti Adi Nugroho
Jurnal Hukum Adigama Vol 1, No 1 (2018): Jurnal Hukum Adigama
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Tarumanagara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24912/adigama.v1i1.2155

Abstract

Food is one of the most necessary needs of humans to survive so that everyone is expected to pay more attention to the food products that will be consumed.Indonesia is a country with a predominantly Muslim population. In the teachings of Islam there are orders to consume halal food and prohibition to consume illegitimate food. Halal product is a product that qualifies halal according to Islamic syariat from its substance, its process and its storage and presentation. This study aims to determine the implementation of law number 33 of 2014 on the guarantee of halal products on the registration of halal certificates on food products and what are the constraints faced in registering halal certificates.The guarantee of consumer protection against the circulation of halal labeled food products is already guaranteed according to the prevailing laws and regulations and the products labeled official halal have provided legal certainty to the halal nature of the product itself which can be seen from the authority given by the government to MUI and BPJPH.
PERLINDUNGAN KONSUMEN PENGGUNA LAYANAN INTERNET BOLT DAN BOLT HOME YANG DICABUT IZINNYA OLEH KEMENTERIAN KOMUNIKASI DAN INFORMATIKA TAHUN 2018 Fivhi Indah Sari; Susanti Adi Nugroho
Jurnal Hukum Adigama Vol 2, No 1 (2019): Jurnal Hukum Adigama
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Tarumanagara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1130.367 KB) | DOI: 10.24912/adigama.v2i1.5181

Abstract

Many internet service providers are not compliant to pay frequency fees to the state so that the Ministry of Communication and Informatics closes PT. Internux which is a subsidiary of PT. First Media is a banned in Lippo Group. The closure resulted in Bolt and Bolt Home consumers not getting internet access so that problems arose 1. How to protect consumer rights for Bolt and Bolt Home internet service customers PT. Internux after revocation of permission by Kominfo? 2. What is the responsibility of the business actor for consumers of Bolt and Bolt Home internet service customers? The method used is the normative legal method. Bolt and Bolt Home consumers only get preventive protection by deactivating top up payment services in order to avoid greater losses for consumers, while repressive protection is not found in this case. The form of responsibility of PT. Internux to consumers based on the provisions of Article 19 Paragraphs (1) and (2) must provide compensation equivalent to the price of the quota package in accordance with the initial agreement agreed with the refund mechanism and provide diversion offer services to other providers. The Ministry of Communication and Information must conduct strict supervision of internet service companies and for consumers to be selective and smart in choosing internet service company providers.
TANGGUNG JAWAB AGEN DISTRIBUTOR ATAS PEREDARAN OBAT KUAT IMPORT TANPA IZIN EDAR DITINJAU DARI UNDANG-UNDANG PERLINDUNGAN KONSUMEN Septyani Roby Hartanty; Susanti Adi Nugroho
Jurnal Hukum Adigama Vol 2, No 1 (2019): Jurnal Hukum Adigama
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Tarumanagara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (605.976 KB) | DOI: 10.24912/adigama.v2i1.5272

Abstract

Law Number 8 of 1999 about Consumer Protection on this matter covers consumer rights and business responsibilities. This study discusses the responsibility for efforts made to fulfill customer rights for information and benefits of imported drugs without marketing permits and also related to licensing regarding permits for consumers who need funds for imported drugs. Legal protection for consumers of illegal drugs carried out by the government through the Food and Drug Supervisory Agency (BPOM). With the presence of BPOM, the government has supervised. Employers are responsible for the makers of goods because they carry out imported goods or official importers. Therefore, businesses that represent individuals must be responsible for losses that arise only as importers not as producers of these goods. Therefore, the legal basis that can be requested by consumers as a form of accountability proposed for drug business assistance is court punishment as regulated by article 62 paragraph 1 of the UUPK. This study gives an appeal to the public to be more careful in taking medicines should be on the advice of a doctor or pharmacist and should not be tempted easily by the promotions offered because drugs containing BKO can be used.
KEDUDUKAN SITA PIDANA TERHADAP SITA UMUM KEPAILITAN Josua Fernando; Susanti Adi Nugroho
Jurnal Hukum Adigama Vol 1, No 1 (2018): Jurnal Hukum Adigama
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Tarumanagara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (353.945 KB) | DOI: 10.24912/adigama.v1i1.2148

Abstract

AbstractThe Court Ruling claim that a debt discharge a bankruptcy inflict a debtor will loose his right to dominate the wealth which include the bankruptcy property. The whole riches of a debt who’s discharge bankruptcy, automatically will be placed to the general confiscation. The general confiscation of the debt property has intend to protect the interest of the creditor of all the deeds of the debt which can disserve the property of a bankruptcy and stop the execution of the debt property with all the creditors to get the debt repayment. The general confiscation itself is a form of confiscation which known in civil law regime especially bankruptcy in legal perspective as a private law.  Confiscation in a criminal case aim to prove criminal act. Article 38 of a Criminal Code Procedure regulate that the investigator can undertake the property of confiscation that placed in the general confiscation. However, Article 46 of a Bankruptcy and Suspension Of Obligation For payment Of  Debt regulate that all confiscation become vanished when the property has  confiscated in the general confiscation. When this two confiscation situated in the property, The confiscation in criminal case will precede the general confiscation. That matter is because of the confiscation in a criminal case is part of public law that aimed to protect our public interest.
Co-Authors Fivhi Indah Sari Josua Fernando Melissa Aulia Hosanna Septyani Roby Hartanty