Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Hukum Adigama PESAGI (Jurnal Pendidikan dan Penelitian Sejarah)
Josua Fernando
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
KEDUDUKAN SITA PIDANA TERHADAP SITA UMUM KEPAILITAN Josua Fernando; Susanti Adi Nugroho
Jurnal Hukum Adigama Vol 1, No 1 (2018): Jurnal Hukum Adigama
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Tarumanagara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (353.945 KB) | DOI: 10.24912/adigama.v1i1.2148

Abstract

AbstractThe Court Ruling claim that a debt discharge a bankruptcy inflict a debtor will loose his right to dominate the wealth which include the bankruptcy property. The whole riches of a debt who’s discharge bankruptcy, automatically will be placed to the general confiscation. The general confiscation of the debt property has intend to protect the interest of the creditor of all the deeds of the debt which can disserve the property of a bankruptcy and stop the execution of the debt property with all the creditors to get the debt repayment. The general confiscation itself is a form of confiscation which known in civil law regime especially bankruptcy in legal perspective as a private law.  Confiscation in a criminal case aim to prove criminal act. Article 38 of a Criminal Code Procedure regulate that the investigator can undertake the property of confiscation that placed in the general confiscation. However, Article 46 of a Bankruptcy and Suspension Of Obligation For payment Of  Debt regulate that all confiscation become vanished when the property has  confiscated in the general confiscation. When this two confiscation situated in the property, The confiscation in criminal case will precede the general confiscation. That matter is because of the confiscation in a criminal case is part of public law that aimed to protect our public interest.
Perbandingan Hasil Belajar Menggunakan Model Pembelajaran Problem Posing dengan Problem Solving Pelajaran Sejarah Josua Fernando; Muhammad Basri; Suparman Arif
PESAGI (Jurnal Pendidikan dan Penelitian Sejarah) Vol 7, No 1 (2019): PESAGI (Jurnal Pendidikan dan Penelitian Sejarah)
Publisher : FKIP UNIVERSITAS LAMPUNG

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (300.974 KB)

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the differences of the students’ learning outcomes between those who were being taught by using problem posing learning models and those with problem solving learning models in history subjects of XI social studies class at SMA Negeri 1 Terbanggi Besar,  Lampung Tengah. The research method used is the experimental design method and the form of the postest only control design. The results of data analysis showed that there were differences in learning outcomes between students using problem posing learning models and problem solving learning models in historical learning.Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui perbedaan hasil belajar siswa antara yang diajar menggunakan model pembelajaran problem posing dengan model pembelajaran problem solving pada Mata Pelajaran Sejarah Kelas XI IPS di SMA Negeri 1 Terbanggi Besar Lampung Tengah Tahun Ajaran 2017-2018. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode experimental design dan bentuk posstest only control design. Hasil analisis data menunjukkan ada perbedaan hasil belajar antara siswa yang menggunakan model pembelajaran problem posing dengan model pembelajaran problem solving pada pembelajaran sejarah.Kata kunci: hasil belajar, problem posing, problem solving
Co-Authors Mudinillah, Adam Suparman Arif Susanti Adi Nugroho