Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Mutu Pangan : Indonesian Journal of Food Quality
I P G Arya Dharmawan
Program Studi Magister Profesional Teknologi Pangan, Sekolah Pascasarjana, Institut Pertanian Bogor
Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Chemistry Public Health

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
Sistem Evaluasi Cara Pergudangan dan Distribusi yang Baik untuk Menjamin Mutu dan Keamanan Susu Bubuk I P G Arya Dharmawan; Harsi Dewantari Kusumaningrum; Winiati Pudji Rahayu
Jurnal Mutu Pangan : Indonesian Journal of Food Quality Vol. 3 No. 1 (2016): Jurnal Mutu Pangan
Publisher : Department of Food Science and Technology (ITP), Faculty of Agricultural Technology, Bogor Agricultural University (IPB) in collaboration with the Indonesian Food and Beverage Association (GAPMMI), the National Agency of Drug and Food Control, and th

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Good practices in food chain are very important to ensure product quality and safety. Good practices start from raw material usage, manufacturing, warehousing, distribution, retailing, until product consumption by consumers. Milk powder is a high value commodity but it is a high risk product. Good warehousing and distribution system must be in place to ensure product quality and safety. Quality and food safety system evaluation model consists of 4 steps: plan, do, check, and action. A model on quantitative evaluation system for good warehouse practice (GWP) and good distribution practice (GDP) consist of five points (internal, external area, transportation, quality management, and inventory management). These five points were detailed to 30 sub points. Criteria and requirements have been included for each sub point, and defined by 5 scales (0, 1, 2, 3, and 4). Furthermore, the evaluation system has been implemented at 3 distributors (A, B, and C) in 30 cities. The result showed that distri- butors A, B and C complied to the criteria with the score of 77.32+4.05%, 84.17+5.80%, and 73.30+ 6.64%, respectively. The distributors were categorized as very good (13.30%), good (60.0%) and fair (13.30%). 
Co-Authors Harsi D. Kusumaningrum Winiati Pudji Rahayu