Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Parafrase: Jurnal Kajian Kebahasaan dan Kesastraan Tabsyir: Jurnal Dakwah Dan Sosial Humaniora Prosiding Seminar Hukum Aktual Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia
MOH. HARIYANTO
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Arts Humanities Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
DEKONSTRUKSI LAKON GRAFFITO AHMAD FAISHAL; MOH. HARIYANTO
PARAFRASE : Jurnal Kajian Kebahasaan & Kesastraan Vol 18 No 2 (2018)
Publisher : Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (212.119 KB) | DOI: 10.30996/parafrase.v18i2.1719

Abstract

A text of drama is importance and an integral part of any drama perfomarnces. However, it seems that it has obtained lack of appreciation and has been separated from a performance. It is needed only when it will be performed. This article tries to explore the ideas of deconstruction in Akhudia’s Grafito. Deconstructive method proposed three steps in its reading a text, that is verbal stage, textual, and meaning stages. On the verbal stage, the reading of the text is inteded to uncover the paradox and contradiction critically. On the textual stage, the reading is focused on finding the meaning of the whole text. The meaning stage will trace the linguitic meaning of the text. In Grafito, one can read Akhudiat shows a rebellion and an opposition toward the social construction such as religous institution. The characters are given various characteristics, such as being capable to create setting, properties, being shadows, or inside voices which suggest unconvensional dimention propose a paticular artistic value. Keywords: discourse, deconstruction, Graffito
Tinjauan Hukum Ekonomi Syariah Terhadap Praktik Jual Beli Dengan Fluktuasi Harga pada Sistem Pembayaran DP di Kopontren Al Mubarok Desa Pringgondani Kec. Sumberjambe Fawaid Fawaid; Moh. hariyanto
Tabsyir: Jurnal Dakwah dan Sosial Humaniora Vol. 2 No. 2 (2021): April : Jurnal Dakwah dan Sosial Humaniora
Publisher : STAI YPIQ BAUBAU, SULAWESI TENGGARA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59059/tabsyir.v2i2.637

Abstract

This study aims to explain the views of Islamic economic law on the practice of buying and selling with price fluctuations in the DP payment system at Kopontre Al Mubarok, Pringgondani Village, Kec. Sumberjambe. This study uses a qualitative approach. This type of research is in the form of field research. The location of this research is in the Al Mubarok Kopontren, Pringgondani Village, Kec. Sumberjambe. Determination of informants using purposive. Data collection techniques use observation, structured interviews and documentation. The data analysis uses data condensation, data presentation and conclusions. While the validity of the data using source triangulation techniques and technical triangulation. The results showed that the practice of buying and selling with fluctuations in consumer prices first made transactions between the kopontren managers and consumers for the goods being traded and the payment was using DP. In terms of sharia economic law, the practice of buying and selling with price fluctuations in the DP payment system at Al Mubarok Kopontren Pringgondani Village is permissible (legal), because according to the theory of compilation of sharia economic law (KHES) the pillars and conditions in articles 56-57 are fulfilled.
Dekonstruksi Makna Jabatan Politik: Kritik Terhadap Doktrin Open Legal Policy Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Persyaratan Pendidikan Calon Anggota Legislatif Moh. Hariyanto
Prosiding Seminar Hukum Aktual Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia Vol. 4 No. 4 JULI 2026
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The educational requirements of prospective members of the House of Representatives (at least high school) in Law No. 7 of 2017 are the object of testing at the Constitutional Court (MK). The petitioners argued that the standard was too low for the complex legislative function, but the Constitutional Court consistently rejected the doctrine of Open Legal Policy. This research method using normative law (doctrinal legal research) uses legislative, case, and conceptual approaches, by analyzing several Constitutional Court decisions as well as Alexy's theory of proportionality and Habermas' deliberative democracy. The novelty of this research lies in the integration of criticism of inconsistencies in the implementation of Open Legal Policy by the Constitutional Court comparatively across decisions (age requirements, parliamentary thresholds, thresholds for candidacy of regional heads) as well as the incorporation of proportionality tests and other related theories to deconstruct the Constitutional Court's arguments about political positions, experts who have so far escaped academic attention in testing the educational requirements of legislative candidates that the Constitutional Court should have been more judicial activism rather than restraint. The Constitutional Court interprets the education requirements as an Open Legal Policy on the basis of the protection of the right to be a candidate, the representative nature of legislative positions, and the existence of experts. The use of this doctrine is inconsistent because in other cases (presidential age requirements, parliamentary thresholds, thresholds for candidacy for regional heads) the Constitutional Court actually intervenes in legislation policies. The arguments of experts also do not reflect the institutional reality of the House of Representatives and have the potential to create technocratic displacement. The use of the Open Legal Policy doctrine by the Constitutional Court is inconsistent and has the potential to result in constitutional abdication. The Constitutional Court should act judicial activism with a proportionality test to assess the balance between political rights and the quality of legislation.
Co-Authors Ahmad Faishal Fawaid