Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Mutawatir : Jurnal Keilmuan Tafsir Hadith Ulumul Qur'an: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Al-Qur'an dan Tafsir
Khobirul Amru
Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel Surabaya
Religion Humanities Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Al-Ijmā' fī al-Tafsīr dalam Perspektif Mufasir Modern: Telaah Surah al-Kahf [18]: 60 dan al-Layl [92]: 17 Khobirul Amru; Abd. Kholid; Fejrian Yazdajird Iwanebel
Mutawatir : Jurnal Keilmuan Tafsir Hadith Vol. 11 No. 1 (2021): JUNI
Publisher : Jurusan Tafsir Hadis Fakultas Ushuluddin dan Filsafat UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15642/mutawatir.2021.11.1.74-98

Abstract

The existence of al-Ijmā‘ fī al-Tafsīr  as a new discourse which officially incorporates to the study of Uṣūl al-Tafsīr has evoked various questions. The problem seems to lie within the episteme of the discourse which eventually conflicted to the reform spirit of modern Qur’anic exegetes. This study aims at trailing a constituted concept of al-Ijmā‘ fī al-Tafsīr through the eyes of six modern Qur’anic exegeses written by Bint al-Shāṭi’, Sayyid Quṭb, Abū Zahrah, Muḥammad al-Ghazālī, ‘Ābid al-Jābirī and ‘Izzat Darwazah. It begins with analyzing the Qs. al-Kahf [18]: 60 and Qs. al-Layl [92]: 92, as the interpretation of these two verses is stated as a definitive interpretation, which is agreed upon by some commentators (mujma‘ ‘alayh). This paper proves that the discourse of al-Ijmā‘ fī al-Tafsīr has not received enough acceptance or serious attention by most modern commentators. The six modern exegetes also stand on different outlook for the consensus of Qur’anic interpretation: some exegetes quote and admit it; some of them do not cite for certain reasons; and one of them rejects and doubts it.
Polemik Penafsiran Ziyadah dalam Surah Yunus [10]: 26: Analisis Komparatif Penafsiran di Era Klasik Hingga Pertengahan khobirul amru
Ulumul Qur'an: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Al-Qur'an dan Tafsir Vol. 1 No. 2 (2021): Ulumul Qur'an: September 2021
Publisher : Program Studi Ilmu Al-Quran dan Tafsir STIU Darul Quran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (774.102 KB)

Abstract

This article is motivated by the existence of many versions with regard to the exegeses of term ziya>dah in Surah Yu>nus [10]: 26. To read at a glance concerning those diverse versions frequently feels vague and obscure. Moreover, figures behind all of those versions are exegetes whose integrities and capabilities in Quranic Exegesis are unquestionable, such as Ibn Abi> H{a>tim, al-Ma>turi>diy, al-Ma>wardiy, and Ibn al-Jauziy. This thing becomes the point of departure of the urgency to profoundly scrutinize those diverse versions of the exegeses. There is one question aimed in this article, that is, how quranic exegeses from classical exegetes to medieval exegetes on the term ziya>dah are. Using the comparative analysis, this research results in two significant conclusions. The first is that the exegeses of the term ziya>dah continually evolve periodically. The second is that there is an underlying correlation that is linked between the classical period and the medieval period, that the genealogy of the various exegeses of the term ziya>dah in the medieval period can be found in the classical period.
Co-Authors Abd. Kholid Fejrian Yazdajird Iwanebel