Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search
Journal : IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature

Assessing Students' Higher-Order Thinking Skills In Reading Comprehension Syah Ibi Hamma; Syamsiarna Nappu; Erwin Akib
IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature Vol 11, No 2 (2023): IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Liter
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Negeri Palopo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24256/ideas.v11i2.4182

Abstract

This research aimed to find out the score of students’ higher-order thinking skills (HOTS) in Reading Comprehension and the challenges faced by the students when solving HOTS. This research used a quantitative descriptive design. The data were obtained by using tests and questionnaires. The subjects of this research were 22 students who studied in the Twelfth Grade IPA 1 in SMA Pesantren IMMIM Makassar. By definition, Higher-Order Thinking is divided into 3 Categories which were Higher-Order Thinking As Transfer (C4), Higher-Order Thinking as Critical Thinking (C5), and Higher-Order Thinking as Problem Solving (C6). The students answered the test and the questions were at the HOTS level. In challenges, this research investigated the challenges faced by the students when solving HOTS by analyzing the questionnaire. The findings of this research revealed that the score of students’ HOTS was 64,54% which was considered Good, It shows that students scored Higher-Order Thinking as Transfer (C4) was 81,8%, while Higher-Order Thinking as Critical Thinking (C5) was 54,5% and Higher-Order Thinking as Problem Solving (C6) was 9.1%, and as for the challenges faced by students when solving HOTS was 16.63% students facing difficulties in understanding the Meaning of Word (C4), 27.72% facing difficulties in Making Inferences (C5) and 28.81% students facing difficulties in Determining the Main Idea (C6) when solving HOTS Questions. It can be concluded that the student’s Higher-Order Thinking as Transfer (C4) was Excellent, Higher-Order Thinking as Critical Thinking (C5) was good and Higher-Order Thinking as Problem-Solving was Poor, and the challenges that the students faced when solving HOTS Questions were mostly determining the main idea and making inference.
Assessing Students' Higher-Order Thinking Skills In Reading Comprehension Syah Ibi Hamma; Syamsiarna Nappu; Erwin Akib
IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature Vol. 11 No. 2 (2023): IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Lite
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Negeri Palopo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24256/ideas.v11i2.4182

Abstract

This research aimed to find out the score of students’ higher-order thinking skills (HOTS) in Reading Comprehension and the challenges faced by the students when solving HOTS. This research used a quantitative descriptive design. The data were obtained by using tests and questionnaires. The subjects of this research were 22 students who studied in the Twelfth Grade IPA 1 in SMA Pesantren IMMIM Makassar. By definition, Higher-Order Thinking is divided into 3 Categories which were Higher-Order Thinking As Transfer (C4), Higher-Order Thinking as Critical Thinking (C5), and Higher-Order Thinking as Problem Solving (C6). The students answered the test and the questions were at the HOTS level. In challenges, this research investigated the challenges faced by the students when solving HOTS by analyzing the questionnaire. The findings of this research revealed that the score of students’ HOTS was 64,54% which was considered Good, It shows that students scored Higher-Order Thinking as Transfer (C4) was 81,8%, while Higher-Order Thinking as Critical Thinking (C5) was 54,5% and Higher-Order Thinking as Problem Solving (C6) was 9.1%, and as for the challenges faced by students when solving HOTS was 16.63% students facing difficulties in understanding the Meaning of Word (C4), 27.72% facing difficulties in Making Inferences (C5) and 28.81% students facing difficulties in Determining the Main Idea (C6) when solving HOTS Questions. It can be concluded that the student’s Higher-Order Thinking as Transfer (C4) was Excellent, Higher-Order Thinking as Critical Thinking (C5) was good and Higher-Order Thinking as Problem-Solving was Poor, and the challenges that the students faced when solving HOTS Questions were mostly determining the main idea and making inference.
Graduate Students Critical Thinking on Their Analytical Paper Sudirman N; Ratna Dewi; Syamsiarna Nappu
IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature Vol. 13 No. 2 (2025): IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Lite
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Negeri Palopo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24256/ideas.v13i2.5577

Abstract

The research aimed to find out the ability of the graduate student in writing analytical papers and to find out critical thinking which expressed graduate student on their analytical paper. The ability of graduate student has in writing analytical papers refer to Whitakers’ pattern (2009). The critical thinking is express by graduate students on their analytical paper refers to Factions’ The Holistic Critical Thinking Scoring Rubric. This research used a Descriptive Quantitative Method. The sample of this research was graduate students’ thesis from the Graduate Program of English Language Education at Muhammadiyah University of Makassar at second semester of 2022 – 2023 academic years. The total was 14 master's theses. The total sample was fourteen graduate students’ papers. The procedure of this research was collected by analyzing the graduate students’ papers by using a rubric. The results of research found that 1) the ability graduate student have in writing analytical papers was good which the students wrote   hook, bridge and thesis in introduction. Topic sentences are clear and some connection to the thesis, the supporting consistently develops the main idea, and transitions show connection between ideas. There are restate thesis and summarized in conclusion. 2) The critical thinking is express by graduate student in their analytical which identified based on the Facione’ The Holistic Critical Thinking Scoring Rubric which focuses on six cognitive abilities (interpretation, analysis, inference, evaluation, explanation and self-regulation).