Sri Sulistyowati
Sebelas Maret University

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Apakah Endometriosis Mempengaruhi Kualitas Embryo pada Pasien Invitro Fertilization? Dewanto Suryoningrat; Abdurahman Laqif; Soetrisno Soetrisno; Uki Retno Budihastuti; Sri Sulistyowati
JURNAL KESEHATAN REPRODUKSI Vol 8, No 1 (2021)
Publisher : Fakultas Kedokteran, Kesehatan Masyarakat dan Keperawatan UGM

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jkr.63039

Abstract

Latar Belakang Invitro Fertilization merupakan salah satu manajemen infertilitas yang baik, namun masih didapatkan adanya kesamaan peluang kegagalan perkembangan embrio sebanyak 50% dibandingkan dengan pasien yang tidak mengalami endometriosis.Tujuan: untuk mengetahui hubungan endometriosis dan kualitas embrio pada pasien yang menjalani program invitro fertilization.Metode: Data yang dikumpulkan merupakan data pada rekam medis pasien Klinik Fertilitas Sekar yang menjalani invitro fertilization di Klinik Fertilitas Sekar RSUD Dr. Moewardi Surakarta pada Januari 2010 – Desember 2019. Analisis menggunakan uji deskriptif dan Uji T tidak berpasangan. Hasil dianggap signifikan jika p ≤ 0,05.Hasil dan Pembahasan: Dalam penelitian ini, rerata kualitas embrio baik memiliki perbedaan yang signifikan (p<0.05) antara pasien dengan endometriosis dan pasien tanpa endometriosi, sedangkan kualitas embrio buruk tidak memiliki perbedaan yang signifikan (p>0.05).Kesimpulan: Endometriosis memiliki hubungan yang signifikan dengan kualitas embrio pada wanita yang menjalani program IVF.
Strategies and Determinants Influencing Cervical Cancer Screening Participation: A Narrative Review of Global Evidence Nanik Setiyawati; Sri Sulistyowati; Heru Priyanto
Mulawarman International Conference on Tropical Public Health Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): The 4th MICTOPH
Publisher : Faculty of Public Health Mulawarman University, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Background : Cervical cancer remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality among women worldwide, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. Despite the availability of effective screening methods such as Pap smear and HPV testing, participation rates remain suboptimal due to various social, cultural, and systemic barriers. Objective : This study aims to identify effective strategies and key determinants influencing women’s participation in cervical cancer screening across diverse cultural and geographical contexts. Research Methods/ Implementation Methods : A narrative synthesis of 12 peer-reviewed articles published between 2018 and 2025 was conducted. Articles were selected based on relevance to cervical cancer screening, including randomized controlled trials, cross-sectional surveys, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses. Key themes were extracted and analyzed for trends, effectiveness of interventions, and associated factors Results : Educational interventions, including empowerment programs and narrative media approaches, significantly increased screening knowledge and participation (p < 0.05). Opt-out invitation systems and community-based outreach campaigns demonstrated higher uptake compared with routine invitations. However, substantial gaps persist, particularly among rural and low-income women, due to limited awareness, fear, and cultural stigma. Factors such as education, income, age, parity, and contraceptive use were consistently associated with screening participation. Conclusion/Lesson Learned : Integrated strategies combining education, community empowerment, and opt-out systems effectively enhance cervical cancer screening uptake. Addressing sociocultural and economic barriers through context-specific public health interventions is essential. Further longitudinal studies are needed to evaluate the sustainability of these approaches in improving screening behavior.
STRATEGIES AND DETERMINANTS INFLUENCING CERVICAL CANCER SCREENING PARTICIPATION: A NARRATIVE REVIEW OF GLOBAL EVIDENCE Nanik Setiyawati; Sri Sulistyowati; Heru Priyanto
Mulawarman International Conference on Tropical Public Health Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): The 4th MICTOPH
Publisher : Faculty of Public Health Mulawarman University, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Cervical cancer remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality among women worldwide, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. Despite the availability of effective screening methods such as Pap smear and HPV testing, participation rates remain suboptimal due to various social, cultural, and systemic barriers. This study aims to identify effective strategies and key determinants influencing women’s participation in cervical cancer screening across diverse cultural and geographical contexts. A narrative synthesis of 12 peer-reviewed articles published between 2018 and 2025 was conducted. Articles were selected based on relevance to cervical cancer screening, including randomized controlled trials, cross-sectional surveys, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses. Key themes were extracted and analyzed for trends, effectiveness of interventions, and associated factors. Educational interventions, including empowerment programs and narrative media approaches, significantly increased screening knowledge and participation (p < 0.05). Opt-out invitation systems and community-based outreach campaigns demonstrated higher uptake compared with routine invitations. However, substantial gaps persist, particularly among rural and low-income women, due to limited awareness, fear, and cultural stigma. Factors such as education, income, age, parity, and contraceptive use were consistently associated with screening participation. The conclusion of this study is that integrated strategies combining education, community empowerment, and opt-out systems effectively enhance cervical cancer screening uptake. Addressing sociocultural and economic barriers through context-specific public health interventions is essential. Further longitudinal studies are needed to evaluate the sustainability of these approaches in improving screening behavior.