Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Paediatrica Indonesiana
Haroen Noerasid
Department of Child Health, Airlangga University Medical School/Dr. Soetomo Hospital, Surabaya, East Java
Health Professions Medicine & Pharmacology

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Loperamide for acute diarrhoea in infancy (a clinical experience) Pitono Soeparto; Liek Djupri; Hardjono Soeparto; Haroen Noerasid
Paediatrica Indonesiana Vol 21 No 5-6 (1981): May - June 1981
Publisher : Indonesian Pediatric Society

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (328.597 KB) | DOI: 10.14238/pi21.5-6.1981.115-8

Abstract

A total of 94 infants aged below 3 years with acute maetry diarrhoea underwent treatment with loperamide (Normotil, Pharos Indonesia). They were arbitarily divided into group I (46 patients) receiving loperamide and group II (48 patients) receiving loperamide & antibiotics in addition to oral glucose-electrolyte solution. Stools became normal within 3 days in 69.6% of patients in group I and 86% in group 11, and within 7 days in 87% of patients in group 1 and 95.4% in group Il. In 5 patients, diarrhoea worsened within 24 hours, necessitating the administration of i.v.f.d. There were no side-effects encountered during the treatment of loperamide.
Thiamphenicol in the treatment of cholera in children Haroen Noerasid; Eko Sujanto; Ismoedijanto Ismoedijanto; Djoko Soejono; I. G. G. Djelantik; Surata Surata
Paediatrica Indonesiana Vol 21 No 9-10 (1981): September - October 1981
Publisher : Indonesian Pediatric Society

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14238/pi21.9-10.1981.197-204

Abstract

A study has been performed to measure the efficacy of thiamphenicol by comparing it with tetracycline as a standard drug. Eighty bacteriologically confirmed cholera patients were included in this study.Among them, 41 patients were treated with thiamphenicol while the other39 with tetracycline.Stool volume, duration of diarrhea and duration of hospitalization were higher in the thiamphenicol group. And the volume of intravenous and oral fluid therapy were less in the tetracycline group.Positive bacteriologic examinations of the second samples (taken on the second day of hospitalisation) of the thiamphenicol grollp were 41.46% as compared with 17.94% of the tetracycline group. But almost all o{ the third samples of both groups were negative.Clinical success rate of thiamphellicol was 95.12% and tetracycline was 100%. Thiamphenicol appeared to be effective against cholera in children.
Co-Authors Djoko Soejono Eko Sujanto Hardjono Soeparto I. G. G. Djelantik Ismoedijanto Liek Djupri Pitono Soeparto Surata Surata