Tri Hardi Priyanto
Center of Science and Technology for Advanced Materials, National Atomic Energy Agency/BATAN, Puspiptek Serpong, Banten 15314, Indonesia

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Texture Analysis using The Neutron Diffraction Method on The Non Standardized Austenitic Steel Process by Machining,Annealing, and Rolling Priyanto, Tri Hardi; Parikin, Parikin; Li, Meijuan
Makara Journal of Technology Vol. 20, No. 1
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Austenitic steel is one type of stainless steel which is widely used in the industry. Many studies on austenitic stainless steel have been performed to determine the physical properties using various types of equipment and methods. In this study, the neutron diffraction method is used to characterize the materials which have been made from minerals extracted from the mines in Indonesia. The materials consist of a granular ferro-scrap, nickel, ferro-chrome, ferro-manganese, and ferro-silicon added with a little titanium. Characterization of the materials was carried out in three processes, namely: machining, annealing, and rolling. Experimental results obtained from the machining process generally produces a texture in the 〈100〉 direction. From the machining to annealing process, the texture index decreases from 3.0164 to 2.434. Texture strength in the machining process (BA2N sample) is 8.13 mrd and it then decreases to 6.99 in the annealing process (A2DO sample). In the annealing process the three-component texture appears, cube-on-edge type texture {110}〈001〉, cube-type texture {001}〈100〉, and brass-type {110}〈112〉. The texture is very strong leading to the direction of orientation {100}〈001〉, while the {011}〈100〉 is weaker than that of the {001}, and texture with orientation {110}〈112〉 is weak. In the annealing process stress release occurred, and this was shown by more randomly pole compared to stress release by the machining process. In the rolling process a brass-type texture{110}〈112〉 with a spread towards the goss-type texture {110}〈001〉 appeared, and the brass component is markedly reinforced compared to the undeformed state (before rolling). Moreover, the presence of an additional {110} component was observed at the center of the (110) pole figure. The pole density of three components increases with the increasing degree of thickness reduction. By increasing degrees of rolling from 81% to 87%, the value of orientation distribution function increases by a factor about three times.
Effects of the Preheating Temperature on the Crystal Structure and Texture of Martensitic Stainless Steel Priyanto, Tri Hardi; Muslih, Rifai; Mugirahardjo, Herry; Bharoto, Bharoto; Insani, Andon; Muzzakiy, Muzzakiy
Makara Journal of Technology Vol. 22, No. 2
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Theoretically, the preheating temperature refers to the start martensite temperature (Ms), and the martensite transformation can be considered as the conservation of the invariant habit-plane in the lattice structure. The habit-plane is the interface plane between austenite and martensite as measured on a macroscopic scale. From the calculation, Ms = 252 °C. The martensite formation can be affected by temperature or stress treatment. In this experiment, temperature treatment was conducted. The sample was treated at 250 °C ± 10 °C. Before and after the pre-heat treatment, the sample was characterized using the neutron diffraction method. BATAN’s Texture Diffractometer (DN2) with a neutron wavelength of 1.2799Å was used to characterize the sample. Analysis of the crystal structure showed that there are three phases before the preheating. The lattice parameters (a) obtained were as follows: for the -phase, a = 2.8501 ± 0.0004 Å; for the α’-phase, a= b =2.517 ± 0.003 Å, and c= 3.581 ± 0.002 Å; for the -phase, a= 3.5884 ± 0.0004 Å, Rwp = 17.94%, and  = 1.33. After preheating, only the -phase appears with a = 3.5830 ± 0.0005 Å, Rwp = 26.03%, and  = 1.17. The orientation distribution function is modeled by the sample symmetrization model based on triclinic to orthorhombic sample symmetry. It shows that, before being preheated, the -phase has {100} <001> with texture index (F2 ) between 0.701 m.r.d. to 3.650 m.r.d., the α-phase has a texture index between 0.923 m.r.d. to 1.768 m.r.d., and the ’-phase has a texture index between 0.910 m.r.d. to 1.949 m.r.d. After being preheated, the -phase also has {100} <001> with a texture index between 0.846 m.r.d. to 3.706 m.r.d. It can be concluded, that because of the high preheating temperature, a phase change from martensite to austenite occurred that allowed the sample to be welded easily. After preheating, the -phase has the same cubic type orientation {100} <001>, and the texture index is nearly the same as that before preheating, with not martensite present.
Characterization and Analysis of Hardness, Microstructure, and Crystallography of SS 304-Sheathed MgB2 Superconducting Wires Rivai, Rizky Ramadhani; Pramono, Andika Widya; Priyanto, Tri Hardi; Maghfirah, Awan
Metalurgi Vol 38, No 1 (2023): Metalurgi Vol. 38 No. 1 2023
Publisher : National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (828.233 KB) | DOI: 10.55981/metalurgi.2023.694

Abstract

This research was conducted to analyze the hardness, microstructural morphology, and crystallography of the MgB2 compound in the form of a SS 304-sheathed superconducting wire. MgB2 superconducting wire with SS 304 outer sheath was manufactured using an ex-situ rolling process. The results of the Vickers hardness test with a load of 0.3 N showed the MgB2 hardness value of 355.1 HV. The results of observations with SEM-EDS (scanning electron microscopy-energy dispersive spectroscopy) showed the agglomerations of the second phase of (Mg)B-O with various compositions due to the rolling process. There was also a longitudinal crack in the MgB2 area due to the work-hardening phenomenon in the brittle MgB2 solid. There were no obvious Bragg peaks in the MgB2 phase. The detected Bragg peaks came from the austenitic (g-Fe) of SS 304-sheath.