Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

PEMBERDAYAAN SUMBER DAYA HAYATI TANAH MENDUKUNG PENGEMBANGAN PERTANIAN RAMAH LINGKUNGAN G., Subowo; Purwani, Jati
Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pertanian Vol 32, No 4 (2013): Desember 2013
Publisher : Pusat Perpustakaan dan Penyebaran Teknologi Pertanian

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Pemberdayaan sumber daya biotik maupun abiotik tanah dapatmeningkatkan efisiensi sistem produksi pertanian. Sumber dayabiotik tanah meliputi flora dan fauna tanah. Pengelolaan sumberdaya biotik tanah dengan mengurangi asupan dari luar dapatmencegah perubahan ekosistem yang ekstrem. Dalam rangkamelestarikan sistem produksi yang mandiri dan ramah lingkungan,penetapan parameter lingkungan harus jelas dan terukur denganmemerhatikan produktivitas yang akan dicapai dan konservasisumber daya. Penggunaan lahan harus sesuai daya dukungnya,neraca hara seimbang, mencegah erosi tanah pada level di bawahtolerable soil loss, dan menekan emisi CO2 di bawah ambang batastoleransi. Pengendalian hama dan penyakit dilakukan secara hayatisehingga mencegah cemaran polutan pada produk maupun hasilsamping di bawah ambang batas. Selain itu, pelaku daur ekosistemtanah lengkap (produsen, konsumen, dan pengurai) dan tidak terjadigangguan lingkungan. Populasi fauna tanah yang terancam akibatsistem pertanian intensif perlu dipulihkan dengan memberikanbahan organik sebagai sumber hara dan energi, sehingga dapatberperan dalam konservasi bahan organik tanah dan memperbaikisifat fisik tanah. Penggunaan pupuk anorganik, organik, dan hayatisecara terpadu, menghindari pestisida sintetis, dan adanya cacing tanahendogaesis merupakan indikator pertanian ramah lingkungan.
Land Suitability Study in Ultisols for Soybean Based on Soil Fauna Anwar, Ea Kosman; Nurlaily, Ridha; Sarmah, .; Purwani, Jati
JOURNAL OF TROPICAL SOILS Vol. 18 No. 3: September 2013
Publisher : UNIVERSITY OF LAMPUNG

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5400/jts.2013.v18i3.231-239

Abstract

Evaluation of land suitability for soybean by involving the presence and biodiversity of soil fauna has been conducted. The research was done on thecenter of soybean plantations in Ultisols soils in Banten, Lampung, and Lahat (south Sumatera) Provinces. The objective of research was to determine the interaction between soil fauna diversity in Ultisols soil and productivity of soybean. The research used a Survey Method. Every location was divided into three categories of vegetation performance, such as, less vegetation, average vegetation, and very fertile vegetation with two replicates. The chemical, physical, and biological properties of soils from every unit sampling were analyzed. The results showed that nutrient and chemical properties of soil which directly influenced the growth and production of soybean was P-potential, P-available, K-available, B (Boron), Ca and pH; the physical properties were pores drainage, pores rapid drainage, soil water content, and soil permeability. The presence of earthworm did not have direct effect to soybean, except as the 3th between variables, meaning that the presence of earthworms affected soil physical properties, soil physical properties affected nutrient availability, nutrient availability affected the biomass and yield of soybean.Keywords: Earthworm, land suitability, soil fauna, soybeans, Ultisol [How to Cite: Anwar EK, R Nurlaily, Sarmah and J Purwani. 2013. Land Suitability Study in Ultisols for Soybean Based on Soil Fauna. J Trop Soils 18 (3): 231-239. Doi: 10.5400/jts.2013.18.3.231][Permalink/DOI: www.dx.doi.org/10.5400/jts.2013.18.3.93]REFERENCESAlexander M. 1977. Introduction of Soil Microbiology. John Wiley and Sons, New York-Chichester-Brisbane-Toronto-Singapore, 467 p.Anwar EK. 2007. Pengaruh Inokulan Cacing Tanah dan Pemberian Bahan Organik terhadap Kesuburan dan Produktivitas Tanah Ultisols. J Trop Soils 12: 121-130 (in Indonesian).Anwar EK, RDM Simanungkalit, E Santoso and Sukristiyobubowo. 2010. Population density and distribution in wetland earthworm organic farming systems, semi organic and conventional. Biota, J Biol Sci 15: 113-117.Ayuke FO,L Brussard, BVanlauwe, J Six, DK Lelei, CN Kibunja and MM Pulleman. 2011. Soil fertility management: Impacts on soil macrofauna, soil aggregation and soil organic matter allocation. Appl Soil Ecol 48: 53-62.Balai Penelitian Tanah. 2005. Petunjuk Tekniks Analisis Kimia Tanah, Tanaman, Air, dan Pupuk. Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pertanian Departemen Pertanian. Bogor, 136 p. (in Indonesian).Dayan A, 1979. Introduction Methods Statistik. Jilid I, LP3ES, Jakarta (in Indonesian).Djaenudin D, H Marwan, H Subagjo and A Hidayat. 2003. Technical Guidelines for Agricultural Land Evaluation. Research Institute for Soil, Puslitbangtanak, Agricultural Research Agency, 154p.Djaenudin D, H Marwan, H Subagyo, A Mulyani and N Suharta. 2003a. Kriteria Kesesuaian Lahan untuk Komoditas Pertanian. Versi 3. Pusat Penelitian Tanah dan Agroklimat, Bogor (in Indonesian)Drapper N and H Smith 1976. Applied Regression Analysis, Second Edition. WileyIntersciencea division of John Wiley & Sons. Inc. 605 Third Avenue, New York N.10158Edwards CA and JR Lofty. 1977. Biology of Earthworms. A Boo Halsted Press, John Wiley & Sons, New York. 333 p.Giller KE, MH Beare, P Lavelle, AMB Izac and MJ Swift. 1997. Agricultural Intensification, Soil Biodiversity, and agroecosystem function. Appl Soil Ecol 6: 3-16.ICALRRD [Center for Agricultural Land Resources Research and Development]. 2006. Soil Physical Properties and Methods of analysis. Agency for Agricultural Research and Development Department of Agriculture. 282p.ICALRRD [Center for Agricultural Land Resources Research and Development]. 2007. Soil Biology Analysi Methods. Agency for Agricultural Research and Development Department of Agriculture. Kilowasid MLH, TS Syamsudin, FX Susilo and E Sulistyawati. 2012. Ecological Diversity of Soil Fauna as Ecosystem Engineers in Small-Holder Cocoa Plantation in South Konawe. J Trop Soils 17: 173-180.Lal R. 1995. Sustainable Management of Soil Resources in the humic Tropics. United Nations University Press, Tokio-New York-Paris, pp. 25-29.Rao S. 1994. Soil microorganisms and plant growth. Publisher University of Indonesia, 354 p.Soil Survey Staff. 1998. Keys to Soil Taxonomy. 8th Edition. USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service. Washington DCSubowo G, I Anas, G Djajakirana, A Abdurachman and S Hardjowigeno. 2002. Pemanfaatan cacing tanah untuk meningkatkan produktivitas Ultisols lahan kering. J Tanah Iklim 20: 35-46 (in Indonesian).Subowo G. 2010. Peranan biologi tanah dalam evaluasi kesesuaian lahan pertanian kawasan mega diversity tropika basah. Balai Besar Litbang Sumberdaya Lahan Pertanian. Badan Litbang Pertanian. J Sumberdaya Lahan 4: 93-102 (in Indonesian).Subowo G. 2011. Penambangan Sistem Terbuka Ramah Lingkungan dan Upaya Reklamasi Pasca Tambang untuk Memperbaiki Kualitas Sumberdaya Lahan dan Hayati Tanah. J Sumberdaya Lahan 5: 83-94 (in Indonesian).Zangarle A, A Pando and P Lavelle. 2011. Do earthworms and roots cooperate to build soil macroaggregates? Geoderma 167-168: 303 -309.
Effectiveness of Inorganic Fertilizer and Biofertilizer Application on Maize Yield and Fertilizer Use Efficiency on Inceptisol from West Java Purwani, Jati; Nurjaya, Nurjaya
JOURNAL OF TROPICAL SOILS Vol. 25 No. 1: January 2020
Publisher : UNIVERSITY OF LAMPUNG

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5400/jts.2020.v25i1.11-20

Abstract

The study about the effectiveness of inorganic fertilizer and bio-fertilizer application on maize yield and fertilizer use efficiency has been carried out in the greenhouse using Inceptisol from Dukuh Village, Cibungbulang District, Bogor Regency. Inorganic fertilizers used were Urea, SP36 and KCl, the biofertilizer used consisted of Azospirillum sp., Azotobacter sp., Bacillus sp., and Lactobacillus sp.. The study was arranged in a Randomized Block Design consisting of seven treatments and six replications. The treatments consisted of various dosages of inorganic fertilizers combined with bio-fertilizer, namely 1) Control (without fertilizer), 2) 100% recommended NPK level, 3) Biofertilizer, 4) 25% recommended NPK level+Biofertilizer, 5) 50% recommended NPK level+Biofertilizer, 6) 75% recommended NPK level + Biofertilizer, 7) 100% recommended NPK level + Biofertilizer. The results showed that the application of inorganic NPK ferttilizers and biofertilizer on maize cultivation on Inceptisol from Dukuh Village, Cibungbulang District, Bogor Regency resulted in an increase of maize yield compared to the recommended level of inorganic fertilizers (100% NPK). The treatment of NPK (50% recommended level)+Biofertilizer resulted in the highest biomass dry weight, yield of corn and value of RAE (Relative Agronomic Effectiveness). The shoot dry weight was 138.09 g pot-1, corn yield was 190.87 g pot-1, and RAE value was 113.44%. The optimum doses of NPK fertilizers were 200 kg Urea ha-1, 60 kg SP-36 ha-1 and 45 kg KCl ha-1 combined with 4 L ha-1 biofertilizer.
Effect of Cyanobacteria-Enriched Compost on Maize (Zea mays. L) Growth and Yield and Nutrient Uptake in Inceptisols Oktaviyani, Trias; Tamad, Tamad; Purwani, Jati
JOURNAL OF TROPICAL SOILS Vol. 29 No. 1: January 2024
Publisher : UNIVERSITY OF LAMPUNG

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5400/jts.2024.v29i1.11-21

Abstract

Increased production of food crops has various obstacles, including soil fertility, which is also caused by the price of inorganic fertilizers, which is burdensome for farmers. Organic and biofertilizers can reduce the use of inorganic fertilizers and the level of degradation of soil fertility. The research was conducted in the greenhouse of Indonesia Soil Research Institute in Bogor from October 2021 to March 2022. The treatments were laid out in a randomized block design consisting of 12 treatments with three replications, consisting of level doses of NPK combined with compost, cyanobacteria, and (Cyanobacteria-enriched compost). (NPK75%+compost) treatment gave the highest corn cobs and grain yield by 209.86 g plant-1 (8.55%) and 163.49 g plant-1 (6.42%), respectively compared to NPK100%. The treatment of  (NPK75%+compost) gave a similar grain yield with 100% NPK and can scale down  NPK used by 25%. (NPK50%+cyanobacteria-enriched compost) treatment increased N uptake by 48.81% compared to NPK100%. The treatment of (NPK50%+cyanobacteria-enriched compost) increased P uptake by 0.8 mg plant-1 or 17.0% compared to NPK50%+compost. At NPK50%+cyanobacteria, K uptake increased by about 31.46% compared to NPK50%.