Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

URGENSI PERSIDANGAN SECARA ELEKTRONIK (E-LITIGASI) DALAM PERSPEKTIF HUKUM ACARA PERADILAN AGAMA DI ERA DIGITALISASI Riyan Ramdani; Dewi Mayaningsih
Al-Ahwal Al-Syakhsiyyah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Peradilan Islam Vol 2, No 2 (2021): Al-Ahwal Al-Syakhsiyyah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Peradilan Islam
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/as.v2i2.14339

Abstract

AbstractThe issuance of Supreme Court Regulation Number 1 of 2019 concerning the Administration of Cases and Trials in Courts Electronically (e-litigation) is an attempt by the Supreme Court to realize modern court services based on information technology in the era of digitalization 4.0. The religious court is one of the judicial bodies that organizes electronic trials. Electronic court hearings in religious courts are expected to provide convenience for justice seekers by still referring to the provisions of the procedural law of religious courts which have been the guidelines for trial practice in religious courts. The purpose of this study is to determine the urgency of electronic trial (e-litigation) at the Religious Courts in the era of digitalization 4.0, and to examine the electronic trial (e-litigation) in the perspective of the procedural law of religious courts. The method used in this research is descriptive, with a normative juridical approach, and analysis with library research. From this research, it is known that electronic trials (e-litigation) in religious courts can provide convenience for court apparatus and for the public in conducting trials and electronic trials are a form of simplification of the procedural law of religious courts.Keywords: E-Litigation, Religious Court Procedural Law, Digitization AbstrakLahirnya Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1 Tahun 2019 tentang Administrasi Perkara dan Persidangan di Pengadilan Secara Elektronik (e-litigasi) merupakan upaya Mahkamah Agung untuk mewujudkan pelayanan pengadilan yang modern berbasis teknologi informasi di era digitalisasi 4.0. Pengadilan agama menjadi salah satu badan peradilan yang menyelenggarakan persidangan elektronik. Persidangan elektronik di pengadilan agama diharapkan dapat memberikan kemudahan bagi masyarakat pencari keadilan dengan tetap mengacu pada ketentuan hukum acara peradilan agama yang selama ini menjadi pedoman dalam praktik persidangan di pengadilan agama. Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengetahui urgensi dari persidangan elektronik (e-litigasi) pada Pengadilan Agama di era digitalisasi 4.0, dan untuk mengkaji persidangan elektronik (e-litigasi) dalam perspektif hukum acara peradilan agama. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini yaitu desktriptif, dengan pendekatan yuridis normatif, dan analisis dengan library research. Dari penelitian ini diketahui bahwa persidangan elektronik (e-litigasi) di pengadilan agama dapat memberikan kemudahan bagi perangkat pengadilan dan bagi masyarakat dalam menyelenggarakan persidangan serta persidangan elektonik merupakan wujud penyederhanaan dari hukum acara peradilan agama.Kata Kunci : E-litigasi, Hukum Acara Peradilan Agama, Digitalisasi
PENGANIAYAAN BERAT SEBAGAI ALASAN PENGHALANG MEWARISI DALAM KOMPILASI HUKUM ISLAM PASAL 173 HURUF A Riyan Ramdani; M. Najib Karim
Al-Ahwal Al-Syakhsiyyah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Peradilan Islam Vol 1, No 2 (2020): Al-Ahwal Al-Syakhsiyyah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Peradilan Islam
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/as.v1i2.9908

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to explore severe persecution as the reason the barrier inherits in a compilation of Islamic law section 173 the letter A. the topic of “Severe Persecution” isan interesting topic both academic and general quarters about it can be highlighted in both the book and the legacy. Nextaya persecution heavy is the new form of inherited law Indonesia included in a compilation of Islamic law under section 173 of the lette A the view of cleric 4 of madzhab category of severe persecution is not through research. Using the yuridis normative and yuridis empiris method in the form of content analysis. After heavy mayhem is categorized as the reason for the obstacle inheriting acquired knowledge and understanding the data is then analyzed comprehensive to find the basis of his KHI’s law makes the persecution tough as an excuse for inheritable rule, the istinbath of KHI chapter 173 of the relationship between section 173 and the opinions of Indonesian scholars. The study found a result in a compilation of Islam law not given a clear, concrete understanding of what constitutes severe persecution. The priest hanafi argued that murder was not entitled to an inheritance by the one whom he killed whether intentionally or imbued, and then in this context the combination of Islamic law used the three methods of ushul fiqh in determining the renewal of the barrier, first, maslahah mursalah, second, sad dzariah, third, qiyas. And interrelated to the scholars’ opinion that a grouping of heiress in KHI chapter 173 is a legal renewal of heiress according to the code “law can change accourding to the circumstances.Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengeksplorasi penganiayaan berat sebagai alasan penghalang mewarisi dalam Kompilasi Hukum Islam pasal 173 huruf A. Topik mengenai “penganiayaan berat” merupakan topik menarik dikalangan akademik maupun dikalangan umum. Diskursus mengenai hal tersebut dapat disorot dari aspek hukum maupun kewarisan. Selanjutnya penganiayaan berat merupakan bentuk pembaharuan hukum kewarisan di Indonesia yang termaktub dalam Kompilasi Hukum Islam Pasal 173 huruf A sedangkan dalam pandangan Ulama 4 madzhab kategori penganiayaan berat tidak termasuk dalam pandangan para Ulama. Data penelitian ini diperoleh melalui penelitian yang menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dan yuridis empiris dengan bentuk content analysis. Setelah konsep penganiayaan berat yang dikategorikan sebagai alasan penghalang mewarisi dipelajari dan di fahami, data kemudian dianalisa secara komprehensif untuk menemukan dasar hukum KHI menjadikan penganiayaan berat sebagai alasan penghalang mewarisi, proses istinbath hukum KHI pasal 173 dan Hubungan antara pasal 173 dengan pendapat para Ulama Indonesia. Penelitian ini menemukan sebuah hasil Dalam Kompilasi Hukum Islam tidak diberikan pengertian yang jelas dan konkret tentang apa yang dimaksud dengan penganiayaan berat. Imam Hanafi berpendapat bahwasanya pembunuhan tidak berhak mendapatkan warisan dari seseorag yang ia bunuh baik dibunuh secara sengaja atau tidak sengaja, kemudian Dalam konteks ini Kompilasi Hukum Islam menggunakan tiga metode ushul fiqh dalam menentukan pembaharuan penghalang kewarisan, pertama, maslahah mursalah, kedua, sad dzariah, ketiga, qiyas. Dan Hubungan antar pasal dengan pendapat para ulama bahwasa­nya pengelompokkan penghalang waris dalam KHI pasal 173 adalah pembaharuan hukum waris sesuai dari sebuah kaidah “Hukum bisa berubah sesuai dengan keadaan tempat dan waktu”
PENENTUAN BESARAN NAFKAH MADHIYAH, NAFKAH IDDAH DAN MUT’AH DALAM PERKARA PERCERAIAN DI PENGADILAN AGAMA Riyan Ramdani; Firda Nisa Syafitri
ADLIYA: Jurnal Hukum dan Kemanusiaan Vol 15, No 1 (2021): ADLIYA : Jurnal Hukum dan Kemanusiaan
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/adliya.v15i1.11874

Abstract

In navigating the household ark, disharmony cannot be avoided, one of which is the result of neglecting rights and obligations that lead to the breakdown of the marriage. One of the consequences was the burden on the husband to pay for the madhiyah, iddah, and mut'ah livelihoods. The wife has the right to request payment of maintenance to the Religious Court if the husband does not fulfill his obligation to provide for his services. This study aims to discuss the legal basis and considerations of the panel of judges in determining the levels of the amount of madhiyah, iddah, and mut'ah. This study uses normative juridical research to examine statutory regulations related to determining the amount of madhiyah, iddah, and mut'ah. The results showed that First. The basis for determining the amount of income for the former husband is adjusted according to the ability of the husband as stated in Presidential Instruction No. 1 of 1991 concerning KHI, Law no. 1 of 1974, and SEMA No. 3 of 2018 Results of the Plenary of Religion point 2 as the refinement of SEMA No. 7 of 2012 number 16 and Article 149 letter b of the KHI. In the case of divorce talak (Article 8 number (3) letter (c) PERMA No. 3 of 2017) the maintenance of mut'ah and iddah is paid together with the pledge of divorce when pronounced by the Petitioner. Second, the judges' judgment regarding the determination of the level of the amount of living is based on, a) the wife does not commit nusyuz, b) the economic condition of the husband, c) based on the consideration of the reasonable needs of each party.
Menekan Pernikahan Dini Melalui Dispensasi Nikah Riyan Ramdani
VERITAS Vol 9 No 2 (2023): VERITAS
Publisher : Jurnal Program Pascasarjana Ilmu Hukum Universitas Islam As-Syafi'iyah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.34005/veritas.v9i2.3094

Abstract

ABSTRACT Early marriage in Indonesia is an issue that needs attention, this can be seen, one of the ways, in the number of requests for marriage dispensation submitted to the court following the revision of the Marriage Law. In 2020 there were around 65,000 marriage dispensation cases and this will decrease in 2022 to 55,000 cases submitted. Even so, these numbers are still quite fantastic. This research uses a qualitative descriptive method with the type of library research. The results of this research, one way that can be attempted to reduce the rate of early marriage is through marriage dispensation, by creating a Best Interests Report for the Child which is included in the decision and used as material for the judge's consideration, with the hope that parents who consent can revoke their permission. Keywords: Marriage Dispensation, Marriage, early marriage.