Angga Fajar Setiawan
Civil And Environmental Engineering Department, Enginering Faculty, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Civil Engineering Dimension

Structural Systems Comparison of Simply Supported PSC Box Girder Bridge Equipped with Elastomeric Rubber Bearing and Lead Rubber Bearing Alvin Kurniawan Santoso; Djoko Sulistyo; Ali Awaludin; Angga Fajar Setiawan; Iman Satyarno; Sidiq Purnomo; Ignatius Harry
Civil Engineering Dimension Vol. 24 No. 1 (2022): MARCH 2022
Publisher : Institute of Research and Community Outreach - Petra Christian University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1462.812 KB) | DOI: 10.9744/ced.24.1.19-30

Abstract

This study compares the influence of elastomeric rubber bearing (ERB) as the regular bearing support and lead rubber bearing (LRB) as the seismic isolation device on the seismic performance of a seven-span simply supported prestressed concrete (PSC) box girder bridge, which was analyzed using nonlinear time history analysis (NLTHA) with the OpenSees software. The results showed that the maximum pier responses and damage were smaller in models with LRB than with ERB. The bridge model using ERB occurred the slightest damage at levels II, while the one using LRB was at levels I. In addition, the highest seismic performance level in the model with ERB was at the operational limit. Meanwhile, the seismic performance in the model with LRB was at the fully operational limit. Thus, LRB was a good preference for improving the seismic performance and mitigating the damage due to the seismic excitation with a slender pier.
Seismic Performance Comparison of Simply Supported Hollow Slab on Pile Group Structure with Different Operational Category and Shear Panel Damper Application Yusuf Haroki; Ali Awaludin; Henricus Priyosulistyo; Angga Fajar Setiawan; Iman Satyarno
Civil Engineering Dimension Vol. 25 No. 1 (2023): MARCH 2023
Publisher : Institute of Research and Community Outreach - Petra Christian University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.9744/ced.25.1.10-19

Abstract

This study is aimed to compare the seismic performance of simply supported hollow slab on pile group (SHSPG) structures designed as “critical” and “essential” viaducts with shear panel damper (SPD) devices. There were three numerical models to be compared, namely SHSPG-A, SHSPG-B, and SHSPG-C. SHSPG-A is a “critical” viaduct with 35 piles per one pile head. SHSPG-B is an “essential” viaduct with 18 piles per one pile head. SHSPG-C is an “essential” viaduct with 18 piles per one pile head plus sixteen SPDs. Numerical models considered the prestressing effect of the spun pile. Nonlinear time history analyses were executed using seven pairs of recorded ground motions that had been scaled and adjusted to the seismic characteristics of Yogyakarta, Indonesia. As the result, the performance level of SHSPG-A was much better than SHSPG-B. The SPDs application could maintain SHSPG-C’s performance at the same level as SHSPG-A and dissipate 34.28%-53.03% of the seismic energy.