Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Indonesian Journal of Clinical Pathology and Medical Laboratory (IJCPML)
Tutty Prihandani
Department of Clinical Pathology,Faculty of Medicine, Andalas University-Dr.M. Djamil Hospital Padang, Indonesia.
Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Health Professions Medicine & Pharmacology Neuroscience

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
DIFFERENCE IN GLICATED HEMOGLOBIN LEVEL BETWEEN BORONATE AFFINITY METHOD AND ION EXCHANGE-HIGH PERFORMANCE LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY METHOD IN TYPE 2 DIABETES MELLITUS Tuti Asryani; Ellyza Nasrul; Rikarni Rikarni; Tutty Prihandani
INDONESIAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY AND MEDICAL LABORATORY Vol 25, No 2 (2019)
Publisher : Indonesian Association of Clinical Pathologist and Medical laboratory

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24293/ijcpml.v25i2.1466

Abstract

Background: Glycated Hb (HbA1c) test is needed to control glycemic in high prevalence type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) patients. Hemoglobin fraction separated and chemical reaction are two main concepts in HbA1c test. Ion exchange-high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and boronate affinity use first concept. Ion exchange-HPLC is reference method in most of clinical laboratorium. Point of care testing (POCT) with boronate affinity method that has been standardized by international institution is available. The aim of this study was to compare boronate affinity POCT method and ion exchange-HPLC method.Method: This cross sectional study was conducted to 22 type 2 DM patients those fullfill inclusion and exclusion criteria in January 2017 to February 2018. Level of HbA1c was assayed with boronate affinity POCT and ion exchange-HPLC method. T-test was used to analyse data and no significance difference if p>0.005Results: Subjects of this study are women (59.1%) more than men (40.9%) with age mean 59.23 years old (8.1). Uncontroled type 2 DM (77.3%) more than controled type 2 DM (22.7%).Mean of HbA1 level was 8.0% (1.7) in boronate affinity POCT and 8.3% (1.8) in ion exchange-HPLC. T-test showed no significance difference between those two HbA1C assay methods (p>0.005).Conclusion: There was no difference HbA1c level between boronate affinity POCT method and ion exchange-HPLC method.
DIFFERENCE IN HbA1c LEVEL BETWEEN BORONATE AFFINITY AND ION EXCHANGE-HIGH PERFORMANCE LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY METHOD IN DIABETIC PATIENT Tuti Asryani; Ellyza Nasrul; Rikarni Rikarni; Tutty Prihandani
INDONESIAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY AND MEDICAL LABORATORY Vol. 25 No. 2 (2019)
Publisher : Indonesian Association of Clinical Pathologist and Medical laboratory

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24293/ijcpml.v25i2.1466

Abstract

Glycated Hb (HbA1c) test is needed to control glycemic in high prevalence type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (DM) patients. Hemoglobin fraction separated and chemical reaction is two main concepts in the HbA1c test. Ion exchange-high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and boronate affinity use the first concept. Ion exchange-HPLC is a reference method in most of the clinical laboratory. Point of care testing (POCT) with boronate affinity method that has been standardized by the international institution is available. This study aimed to compare the boronate affinity POCT method and ion exchange-HPLC method. This cross-sectional study was conducted to 22 types 2 DM patients those fulfilled inclusion and exclusion criteria in January 2017 to February 2018. Level of HbA1c was assayed with boronate affinity POCT and ion exchange-HPLC method. A t-test was used to analyze data and no significant difference if p>0.005. Subjects of this study are females (59.1%) more than males (40.9%) with age mean 59.23 years old (8.1). Uncontrolled type 2 DM (77.3%) more than controlled type 2 DM (22.7%).Mean of HbA1 level was 8.0% (1.7) in boronate affinity POCT and 8.3% (1.8) in ion exchange-HPLC. T-test showed no significant difference between those two HbA1C assay methods (p>0.005). There was no difference HbA1c level between boronate affinity POCT method and ion exchange-HPLC method.
Co-Authors Ellyza Nasrul Rikarni Rikarni Tuti Asryani