Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Indonesian Journal of Clinical Pathology and Medical Laboratory (IJCPML)
Siti Nurul Hapsari
Department of Clinical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Airlangga University/Dr. Soetomo Hospital, Surabaya
Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Health Professions Medicine & Pharmacology Neuroscience

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
MDRD, CKD-Epi and Creatinine Clearance with 24-Hour Urine Collection Results in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease Siti Nurul Hapsari; Leonita Anniwati
INDONESIAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY AND MEDICAL LABORATORY Vol 27, No 1 (2020)
Publisher : Indonesian Association of Clinical Pathologist and Medical laboratory

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24293/ijcpml.v27i1.1628

Abstract

Kidney disease is a global public health problem, affecting over 750 million people worldwide. Glomerular Filtration Rate(GFR), which is calculated by measuring the creatinine clearance with 24-hour urine collection (CC) can be inaccurate due toimproper urine collection, causing the need for an easier and accurate method of calculation. This study was anobservational analytical cross-sectional research using consecutive retrospective sampling. Samples were data of patientswith Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) who underwent CC test at the Clinical Pathology Laboratory of the Dr. Soetomo HospitalSurabaya during September-October 2018. Data were compared with the results of Cockcroft-Gault (CG), MDRD, andCKD-Epi formula, and were analyzed using the one-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, paired T-test, and Wilcoxon SignedRank test. Correlation of CC results with CG, MDRD, and CKD-Epi results was tested with Spearman's rho and Bland Altmantest. The difference test of CC with CG, MDRD, and CKD-Epi showed results of (p=0.000), (p=0.194), and (p=0.468),respectively. There were significant differences between CC compared to CG, but not MDRD and CKD-Epi. There was amoderate correlation between CG, MDRD, CKD-Epi, and CC with r=0.529; 0.448, and 0.463, respectively. The mostcompatible formula was CKD-Epi. The measurement of GFR with CC correlated with CG, MDRD, and CKD-Epi; therefore, theycould be used as an alternative method to calculate GFR. Further experiments using an exogenous marker should beperformed to determine a suitable eGFR formula according to the degree of damage to the kidney.
MDRD, CKD-Epi and Creatinine Clearance with 24-Hour Urine Collection Results in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease Siti Nurul Hapsari; Leonita Anniwati
INDONESIAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY AND MEDICAL LABORATORY Vol. 27 No. 1 (2020)
Publisher : Indonesian Association of Clinical Pathologist and Medical laboratory

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24293/ijcpml.v27i1.1628

Abstract

Kidney disease is a global public health problem, affecting over 750 million people worldwide. Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR), which is calculated by measuring the creatinine clearance with 24-hour urine collection (CC) can be inaccurate due to improper urine collection, causing the need for an easier and accurate method of calculation. This study was an observational analytical cross-sectional research using consecutive retrospective sampling. Samples were data of patients with Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) who underwent CC test at the Clinical Pathology Laboratory of the Dr. Soetomo Hospital Surabaya during September-October 2018. Data were compared with the results of Cockcroft-Gault (CG), MDRD, and CKD-Epi formula, and were analyzed using the one-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, paired T-test, and Wilcoxon Signed Rank test. Correlation of CC results with CG, MDRD, and CKD-Epi results was tested with Spearman's rho and Bland Altman test. The difference test of CC with CG, MDRD, and CKD-Epi showed results of (p=0.000), (p=0.194), and (p=0.468), respectively. There were significant differences between CC compared to CG, but not MDRD and CKD-Epi. There was a moderate correlation between CG, MDRD, CKD-Epi, and CC with r=0.529; 0.448, and 0.463, respectively. The most compatible formula was CKD-Epi. The measurement of GFR with CC correlated with CG, MDRD, and CKD-Epi; therefore, they could be used as an alternative method to calculate GFR. Further experiments using an exogenous marker should be performed to determine a suitable eGFR formula according to the degree of damage to the kidney. 
Co-Authors Leonita Anniwati