Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Hukum Volkgeist
FAHARUDIN FAHARUDIN
Universitas Dayanu Ikhsanuddin
Arts Humanities

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
PRINSIP CHECKS AND BALANCES DITINJAU DARI SISI DAN PRAKTIK FAHARUDIN FAHARUDIN
Jurnal Hukum Volkgeist Vol 1 No 2 (2017): JUNE
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35326/volkgeist.v1i2.97

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to get a full description about the parliament concept in Indonesia that no clear enough use Threecameralism system (MPR, DPR, DPD) Bicameralism (DPR and DPD), or Unycameralism (MPR). Similarly, if use Bicameralism form (DPR and DPD) so is not make check and balances of character between DPR and DPD make Bicameralism concept in Indonesian only Weak Bicameralism not Strong Bicameralism. Result of this research is power phenomenal more arbitrarily that’s why the power must be limited and restriction of the power must be regulated and limited in certainty of legislation or constitution that purpose no happen accumulation power to one branch of power. Trias Politica doctrine divide three branch of power that is Legislative as make the rule, executive to ride of it, and Judicative to investigate that follow with checks and balances mechanism, so that it’s impress the arbitrarily or maybe make escaped from arbitrarily.
The Power of Detailed Evidence as a Base on Land Rights Ulfa Nisrina Sahib; Andi Suryaman Mustari Pide; Muhammad Ilham Arisaputra; Faharudin Faharudin
Jurnal Hukum Volkgeist Vol. 7 No. 1 (2022): DECEMBER
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35326/volkgeist.v7i1.1993

Abstract

The strength of the proof of detail as the basis for land rights. This study was conducted to analyze the position of the detail as the basis for land rights in proving community ownership of land and to analyze the legal protection of land tenure by the community based on the detail as the basis for their rights. This research uses empirical legal research. The results of the study show that (1) the position of detail as the basis for land rights in proving land ownership by the community, namely before the issuance of the UUPA, detail was proof of ownership of land rights. Along with the enactment of the UUPA and Government Regulation Number 24 of 1997 concerning Land Registration, the Details are no longer as evidence of land rights, but as evidence of a person's control over the controlled land, so that if it is not corroborated with other evidence, the Details cannot be used absolutely as a tool. proof of ownership of land in the trial; and (2) legal protection of land tenure by the community based on details as the basis for their rights, namely that they have not yet fully received legal protection. So that in order to obtain legal certainty and protection.
Co-Authors Andi Suryaman Mustari Pide Muhammad Ilham Arisaputra Ulfa Nisrina Sahib