Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal IDENTIFIKASI: Jurnal Ilmiah Keselamatan, Kesehatan Kerja dan Lindungan Lingkungan
James Evert Adolf Liku
UNIVERSITAS BALIKPAPAN
Environmental Science Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Public Health Transportation Other

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
ANALISIS FAKTOR-FAKTOR YANG MEMPENGARUHI TINDAKAN TIDAK AMAN DI PT PELINDO IV BALIKPAPAN James Evert Adolf Liku; Didik Haryanto; Aftonun Nuha Hasma
IDENTIFIKASI Vol 7 No 1 (2021): IDENTIFIKASI
Publisher : Program Studi D-IV K3

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36277/identifikasi.v7i1.150

Abstract

Unsafe action is a failure to follow the requirements and correct work procedures, thereby increasing the likelihood of accidents. As many as 80%-85% of work accidents are caused by negligence or human error. The number of work accidents at PT. Pelindo IV Balikpapan is categorized as zero accident. However, the description of work behavior at PT. Pelindo IV Balikpapan is still far from the safe category. Use of tools that are not in accordance with regulations, not using appropriate PPE and other violations that can still be encountered in the daily work process. This study aims to determine whether the factors of knowledge and training can influence unsafe action on workers at PT. Pelindo IV Balikpapan. This type of research is using a quantitative approach, namely research related to scores because data collection uses a questionnaire as the main tool for collecting data. The type of research used is obserbasional which is cross sectional with primary and secondary data collection methods. The population is all workers who are in the field as many as 33 workers. The results of this study indicate that knowledge and training factors have a significant effect on unsafe action. Keywords : Training, Knowledge, PT. Pelindo IV Balikpapan, Unsafe Action
PENILAIAN RISIKO PEKERJAAN PERGUDANGAN PADA PT BORNEO MITRA BERSAMA DI BALIKPAPAN Impol Siboro; James Evert Adolf Liku; Abdul Zain; Laura Kartarina Sondakh
IDENTIFIKASI Vol 8 No 2 (2022): IDENTIFIKASI
Publisher : Program Studi D-IV K3

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36277/identifikasi.v8i2.247

Abstract

Warehousing or warehouse is a very important part to support the smooth operation of the upstream oil and gas industry. Work accident is one of the risks that can cause operational disruptions in the warehouse and can cause delays in the process of supplying and delivering tools and materials needed for oil and gas production activities. More than 145,000 people work in 7,000 warehouses, where the fatal injury rate for warehousing is higher than the average for all industries (OSHA, 2004). Therefore companies are required to have a system that regulates hazard identification, risk assessment and risk control or commonly known as Hazard Identification, Risk Assessment and Risk Control (HIRARC). Currently, PT Borneo Mitra Bersama currently has a project at PT Pertamina Hulu Mahakam, namely the Warehouse Support Project. Based on PT BMB's preliminary observations there has been no HIRARC implementation related to the project's operational activities, while the project has a high risk value based on the tender documents. In this study using a qualitative approach. The study design in the research used was based on the ISO 31000: 2018 standard with a semi-quantitative risk analysis technique, by taking informants using a purposive sampling technique, totaling 6 people. The research results show that the risk assessment in PT Borneo Mitra Bersama's warehousing operations has 33 risks identified with the results of the risk evaluation level obtained at the initial risk, namely 6 (18.18%) risk priority level 3, 34 (72.72%) substantial level risk and 11 (33.33%) very high level risk, while the risk evaluation results obtained for residual risk are 24 (9.09%) acceptable level risk and 9 (27.27%) priority 3 or tolerable level risk risk.
Co-Authors Abdul Zain Aftonun Nuha Hasma Didik Haryanto Impol Siboro Laura Kartarina Sondakh