Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.633
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JURNAL MUQODDIMAH : Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hummaniora Nagari Law Review Negara Hukum: Membangun Hukum untuk Keadilan dan Kesejahteraan Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Ekasakti Journal of law and Justice Jurnal Sakato Ekasakti Law Review Journal of Creative Power and Ambition (JCPA)
Lucky Raspati
Universitas Andalas
Arts Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 9 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 9 Documents
Search

 1 
KEBERADAAN AHLI DAN IMPLIKASI NEGATIFNYA TERHADAP ASAS PERADILAN CEPAT, SEDERHANA DAN BIAYA RINGAN (SUATU KRITIK TERHADAP PEMERIKSAAN AHLI DALAM PERADILAN PIDANA DI INDONESIA) (THE PRESENCE OF EXPERT AND THE IMPLICATION TO THE PRINCIPLE OF FAST, SIMPLE AND LOW COST JUDICIAL PROCESS) Lucky Raspati
Jurnal Negara Hukum: Membangun Hukum Untuk Keadilan Vol 3, No 2 (2012)
Publisher : Pusat Penelitian Badan Keahlian Setjen DPR RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22212/jnh.v3i2.233

Abstract

The entering of an expert into a criminal trial is actually not something that just allowed. Judges as the administrative authority in the court granted the right to accept or reject an expert who wants to give their opinion before the trial. Judges act as the gate keeper to assess whether the expert possesses the competence or not in order to help the judges or juries in finding material truth so that a fair decision can be enforced. In this research, the focus problems limited to issues, first, whether the expert examination in a criminal trial was in line with the search for material truth? And second, how is the implication of expert examination to the principle of simple, fast and low cost in criminal trial? The result of the study found that the examination of an expert in a trial is not in line with basic foundation and the aim of the creation of expert witness as one of evidence in criminal procedure. Thus, it is not surprising that the presence of an expert in a criminal trial often does not help judges in finding material truth. Along with these circumstances, the presence of an expert in a criminal trial in practice today tends to be contrary with the principle of justice is fast, simple and low cost. This condition is detrimental to the accused, the prosecutors and the judges itself.ABSTRAKMasuknya seorang ahli ke dalam suatu persidangan perkara pidana sesungguhnya bukan sesuatu hal yang diperbolehkan begitu saja. Hakim sebagai pemegang kekuasaan administratif di pengadilan diberikan kewenangan untuk menerima atau menolak seorang ahli yang ingin memberikan opininya di hadapan persidangan. Hakim bertindak sebagai gate keeper untuk menilai apakah ahli tersebut mempunyai kompetensi atau tidak dalam hal membantu hakim atau juri dalam menemukan kebenaran materiil, sehingga keputusan yang adil bisa ditegakkan. Dalam penelitian ini, fokus permasalahan dibatasi, pertama, apakah pemeriksaan ahli di dalam suatu persidangan perkara pidana sudah sejalan dengan upaya mencari kebenaran materiil? dan kedua, bagaimanakah implikasi pemeriksaan ahli terhadap asas peradilan sederhana, cepat dan biaya ringan? Dari hasil penelitian ditemukan fakta-fakta bahwa pemeriksaan ahli dalam suatu perkara pidana tidak sejalan dengan fondasi dasar dan tujuan dilahirkannya keterangan ahli sebagai salah satu alat bukti dalam hukum acara pidana, sehingga menjadi tidak mengherankan kalau sekarang ini kehadiran ahli dalam suatu persidangan perkara pidana seringkali tidak membantu hakim dalam menemukan kebenaran materiil. Seiring dengan keadaan tersebut, kehadiran ahli dalam perkara pidana sekarang ini cenderung bertentangan dengan asas peradilan cepat, sederhana dan biaya ringan. Kondisi itu tentu sangat merugikan bagi terdakwa, JPU maupun Hakim itu sendiri.
Menakar Makna Merugikan Perekonomian Negara Dalam Undang-Undang Tipikor Taufik Rachman; Lucky Raspati
Nagari Law Review Vol 4 No 2 (2021): Nagari Law Review
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Andalas University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25077/nalrev.v.4.i.2.p.225-238.2021

Abstract

One of the important elements to determine the existence of corruption is the loss of state finances or economic losses of the state. For the latter, the meaning of state economic losses is very rarely used because of the pros and cons in law enforcement practices. For those who are against the loss of the state economy in the crime of corruption argues that the element of aquo is not clear so it is very prone to be misused so contrary to the principle of legality. The basis of his thinking, simply by determining the existence of state financial losses, there is no need to prove the economic loss of the country. For those who are pro will need to prove the loss of the state economy in the case of corruption mentioned that this element needs to be proven as an alternative to determine the adverse consequences of corruption on the country's economy. This paper discusses the parameters used to measure the meaning of "state economic loss" in applying Article 2 and Article 3 of the Tipikor Law. The way to measure aquo losses is to use two stage evaluations, namely the first to determine material losses resulting from illegal acts (PMH) and the second to determine whether the object is directly related to the country's economy. The legal consequences of material losses resulting from PMH in corruption crimes do not always exist to the state's economic losses. If the state's economic losses are considered to exist then the financial losses of the state must exist
Criminal Responsibility For The Occurring of a Patient Safety Incident In a Health Center Which Results in the Leaving of A Baby's Head in a Mother's Womb Before Birth in the Perspective of Health Law in Indonesia Yandriza; Lucky Raspati; Siska Elvandari; Anggun Irwan Nanda
Ekasakti Journal of Law and Justice Vol. 2 No. 2 (2024)
Publisher : Master of Law Program, Ekasakti University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.60034/enk4hx15

Abstract

This research was motivated by a mother from Panpajung Village, Modung, Bangkalan, Madura, East Java, reporting a midwife to the police on suspicion of malpractice. The mother lost the baby she was carrying after the baby's head was left in the womb during the birth process at the health center. The explanation of this case is interesting for the author to discuss who should be responsible for it all, and what criminal responsibility is like regarding the occurrence of patient safety incidents at a community health center resulting in the baby's head being left in the mother's womb before birth in the perspective of health law in Indonesia. The death that occurred to the baby is of course the subject of our collective evaluation, while remaining in favor of the aim of criminal law to provide protection against crimes against a person's body and life, and the death that occurred to the baby, of course, is contrary to the mandate of Law no. 39 of 1999 concerning Human Rights regarding: The Right to Life, and the Right to Defend Life, and also contradicts the aim of health law to reduce suffering, prolong life, and accompany patients until the end of their lives. 
Living Law on The Margins: A Critical Review of Article 2 of The 2023 Indonesian Penal Code Antoni Putra; Lucky Raspati; Taufik Rachman; Iwan Kurniawan
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 15 No 1 (2026)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.15.1.2026.81-110

Abstract

The recognition of living law in society, as stipulated in Article 2 of Law Number 1 of 2023 on the Indonesian Penal Code (KUHP), appears to be a progressive step toward respecting legal pluralism in Indonesia. However, this recognition is conditional and places customary law in a subordinate position to state law. This article critically examines how Article 2 of the KUHP systematically narrows the space for customary law and disregards the sociological reality of living legal traditions. This study employs a normative juridical research method, focusing on the analysis of statutory provisions, legal doctrines, and relevant academic literature. Customary law, which has long been effective in resolving social conflicts, is marginalized due to its perceived incompatibility with formalistic and universal legal principles. This article proposes a deliberative approach as an alternative through equal and dialogical engagement between state and customary legal systems, emphasizing affirmative recognition that respects the autonomy of local legal communities. In doing so, recognizing customary law should not be a limiting instrument but a means to strengthen contextual justice within Indonesia’s diverse society.
Penyusunan dan Pemilihan Sanksi Pidana Dalam KUHP 2023 Antara Paradigma Retributif dan Restoratif Aldyans Rio Pratra; Aria Zurnetti; Lucky Raspati
Jurnal Sakato Ekasakti Law Review Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): Jurnal Sakato Ekasakti Law Review
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/dmyjww16

Abstract

Pembaharuan hukum pidana melalui Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) menandai perubahan fundamental dalam sistem pemidanaan di Indonesia. Salah satu aspek penting dalam pembaharuan ini adalah perubahan dalam penyusunan dan pemilihan sanksi pidana yang tidak lagi semata-mata berorientasi pada pembalasan (retributif), tetapi juga mengakomodasi pendekatan restoratif, rehabilitatif, dan korektif. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis konsep sanksi pidana, tujuan pemidanaan, jenis-jenis sanksi, serta prinsip dan pedoman dalam pemilihan sanksi pidana dalam KUHP terbaru. Metode yang digunakan adalah pendekatan yuridis normatif dengan analisis terhadap peraturan perundang-undangan dan literatur hukum. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa KUHP 2023 memberikan fleksibilitas bagi hakim dalam menjatuhkan sanksi melalui prinsip individualisasi pidana dan pendekatan keadilan restoratif. Namun demikian, implementasi paradigma baru ini masih menghadapi tantangan, terutama dalam aspek kesiapan aparat penegak hukum dan budaya hukum masyarakat.
Peranan Balai Pemasyarakatan Dalam Pembimbingan Klien Residivis Yang Memperoleh Pembebasan Bersyarat Di Balai Pemasyarakatan Kelas II Bukittinggi Iqbal Pahlawan Borotan; Ismansyah Ismansyah; Lucky Raspati
Jurnal Ilmiah Muqoddimah: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hummaniora Vol 10, No 3 (2026): Agustus 2026
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Tapanuli Selatan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31604/jim.v10i3.2026.2154-2162

Abstract

Balai Pemasyarakatan (Bapas) memegang peranan strategis dalam sistem pemasyarakatan, khususnya dalam pembimbingan klien residivis penerima pembebasan bersyarat. Data Bapas Kelas II Bukittinggi menunjukkan bahwa dari 710 klien pembebasan bersyarat tahun 2025, sebanyak 56 orang merupakan klien residivis, sementara hanya terdapat 28 pembimbing kemasyarakatan yang bertugas di wilayah kerja mencakup 8 kabupaten/kota. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis peranan Bapas Kelas II Bukittinggi dalam pembimbingan klien residivis penerima pembebasan bersyarat, kendala yang dihadapi, dan upaya penyelesaiannya. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis empiris bersifat deskriptif analitis. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa: (1) pembimbingan telah dilaksanakan melalui mekanisme wajib lapor, kunjungan rumah, serta tahapan pembimbingan awal, lanjutan dan akhir yang disertai program kepribadian dan kemandirian, namun belum optimal karena tidak ada diferensiasi pola pembimbingan dengan klien non-residivis; (2) kendala bersumber dari faktor internal (keterbatasan SDM, anggaran, sarana-prasarana, dan kekosongan regulasi khusus) dan faktor eksternal (rendahnya kepatuhan klien dan stigma sosial); (3) upaya penyelesaian dilakukan melalui optimalisasi Pokmas Lipas, pembentukan Pos Bapas, peningkatan intensitas pembimbingan, serta penguatan koordinasi dengan pemerintah dan masyarakat
Kedudukan Barang Bukti Pelanggaran Lalu Lintas Yang Tidak Diambil Pemiliknya (Studi Kejaksaan Negeri Padang) Denok Resmini; Aria Zurnetti; Lucky Raspati
Jurnal Ilmiah Muqoddimah: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hummaniora Vol 10, No 3 (2026): Agustus 2026
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Tapanuli Selatan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31604/jim.v10i3.2026.2183-2191

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis kedudukan hukum barang bukti tersebut ditinjau dari perspektif Hukum Acara Pidana dan Hukum Administrasi Negara, praktik pengelolaannya di Kejaksaan Negeri Padang, serta implikasi hukum dan akibatnya pada beban negara. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis empiris (socio-legal) yang bersifat deskriptif analitis dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, kasus, konseptual, dan perbandingan. Data diperoleh melalui studi dokumen, observasi, dan wawancara mendalam dengan aparat penegak hukum di Kejaksaan Negeri Padang. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa: (1) barang bukti yang ditinggalkan pemiliknya berada dalam status limbo hukum (legal limbo), bukan lagi benda sitaan murni namun belum menjadi barang rampasan negara, akibat kekosongan norma (rechtsvacuum) batas waktu pengambilan dalam KUHAP; (2) praktik pengelolaan dilakukan melalui registrasi ketat berbasis E-Piutang dan CMS serta pemanggilan patut melalui surat P-37, telepon, dan pengumuman media massa, namun penumpukan 199-267 unit kendaraan per tahun tetap terjadi; (3) kondisi ini menimbulkan beban administratif, penyusutan ruang penyimpanan, dan kerugian finansial negara akibat biaya pemeliharaan yang terus berjalan. Sebagai solusi, Kejaksaan Negeri Padang melakukan terobosan hukum progresif dengan mengubah status barang bukti menjadi “Barang Temuan” (res derelictae) melalui penetapan pengadilan setelah penghapusan piutang negara (P-49) atas denda yang daluwarsa, kemudian melelangnya bersama KPKNL dan menyetorkan hasilnya sebagai Penerimaan Negara Bukan Pajak (PNBP), sehingga mengubah beban negara menjadi keuntungan fiskal dan mewujudkan asas kemanfaatan hukum
Legal Certainty in the Reconstruction of the Dominus Litis Principle Concerning Connectivity Cases in the Criminal Justice System Yudhi Harioga; Ismansyah Ismansyah; Lucky Raspati
Journal of Creative Power and Ambition (JCPA) Vol. 4 No. 02 (2026): Journal of Creative Power and Ambition (JCPA)
Publisher : CV Edujavare Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70610/jcpa.1998

Abstract

The criminal justice system is a law enforcement mechanism aimed at achieving legal certainty, justice, and the protection of human rights. This study aims to examine: (1) how the *dominus litis* principle should be reconstructed regarding the prosecutor's authority in koneksitas cases; and (2) the certainty of the prosecutor's authority as the Public Prosecutor in relation to Article 170 of the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) within the context of koneksitas cases. This study employs a socio-legal (juridical-empirical) research method. The study concludes the following: (1) The dominus litis principle serves as the legal foundation for the authority of the Public Prosecution Service within the criminal justice system, positioning the Public Prosecutor as the authority responsible for determining the viability of referring a case to court based on valid evidence. Thus, the dominus litis principle ensures a fair, consistent, and accountable prosecution process, as reinforced by the KUHAP. (2) Prosecutors hold the position of case controllers (dominus litis), as affirmed in Article 18 paragraph (1) of Law Number 11 of 2021 concerning the Public Prosecution Service of the Republic of Indonesia, which designates the Attorney General as the supreme public prosecutor. However, the practice of handling koneksitas cases such as a murder case involving a prospective Indonesian Navy non-commissioned officer still reveals a separation of judicial proceedings between civilian and military perpetrators; this creates legal uncertainty and fails to reflect the optimal application of the dominus litis principle by prosecutors.
The Urgency of Regulating Illegally Obtained Evidence (the Exclusionary Rule) in the Indonesian Criminal Justice System: A Perspective on Harmonizing the New Criminal Code and Criminal Procedure Code Shanty Syafyuana Putri; Ismansyah Ismansyah; Lucky Raspati
Journal of Creative Power and Ambition (JCPA) Vol. 4 No. 02 (2026): Journal of Creative Power and Ambition (JCPA)
Publisher : CV Edujavare Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70610/jcpa.1999

Abstract

Criminal law enforcement aims to achieve legal certainty, justice, and the protection of human rights through the criminal justice system. However, the practice of using illegally obtained evidence such as evidence secured through torture, intimidation, or procedural violations persists, even though the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) mandates that evidence be obtained lawfully. This study aims to foster the transformation of Indonesia’s criminal justice system into one that is modern, civilized, and dignified a system where the truth is sought not through illicit means, but through transparent and accountable processes. The study employs a normative juridical research method, analyzing the law as a system of norms. The findings lead to the following conclusions: (1) The regulation of "exclusionary rules" within Indonesia’s criminal evidentiary system fails to provide legal certainty regarding illegally obtained evidence. Consequently, a revision of the KUHAP is required to explicitly regulate the application of exclusionary rules, thereby ensuring legal certainty, justice, and the protection of human rights. (2) The exclusionary rule principle aims to bar the use of illegally obtained evidence in order to protect human rights and guarantee a fair trial. Therefore, explicitly incorporating the exclusionary rule into the KUHAP is an urgent necessity to ensure legal certainty, justice, the integrity of law enforcement, and the protection of human rights.
Co-Authors A. Irzal Rias Aldyans Rio Pratra Anggun Irwan Nanda Antoni Putra Aria Zurnetti Aria Zurnetti, Aria Denok Resmini Diana Arma Iqbal Pahlawan Borotan Ismansyah Ismansyah Iwan Kurniawan Shanty Syafyuana Putri Siska Elvandari Taufik Rachman Tenofrimer, Tenofrimer Yandriza Yandriza Yoserwan Yoserwan Yudhi Harioga