Abdullah Abdullah
Universitas Muhammadiyah Palu

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

KEDUDUKAN BADAN NARKOTIKA NASIONAL DALAM STRUKTUR KETATANEGARAAN DI INDONESIA Abdullah Abdullah
Maleo Law Journal Vol. 4 No. 2 (2020): Oktober 2020
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Palu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Responding to the development of the drug problem which continues to increase and is increasingly serious, the MPR-RI Decree Number VI / MPR / 2002 through the General Session of the People's Consultative Assembly of the Republic of Indonesia (MPR-RI) in 2002 has recommended the DPR-RI and the President of the Republic of Indonesia to make changes to the Law Number 22 Year 1997 concerning Narcotics. Therefore, the Government and DPR-RI ratified and enacted Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics, as an amendment to Law Number 22 of 1997. Based on this law, the institutional status of BNN became a Non-Ministerial Government Institution (LPNK). ) with a vertical structure to the Province and regency / city. In the Province the Provincial BNN was formed, and in the Regency / City the Regency / City BNN was formed Keywords : Legal Position. BNN. State administration
PROS AND CONS OF THE DEATH CRIME IN INDONESIA Muhammad Akbar; Abdullah Abdullah
Omnibus Law Journal Vol. 1 No. 2 (2021): December 2021
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Palu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (679.012 KB)

Abstract

This paper deals with capital punishment imposed on certain crimes. This punishment is governed in the Indonesian Penal Code and other regulations which haver been still in use in Indonesian. Of these regulations is Code No. 26/2000 on Human Rights Court. If Indonesia still imposes death punishment to those commiting certain crimes, it should amend Article 28/A in order that it does not contradict with the Basic Coder of 1945.
Constitutional Regulation of Party-Driven Recall and Democratic Accountability in Indonesia’s Parliament Moh. Yusuf; Muliadi Muliadi; Muhammad Akbar; Abdullah Abdullah
Law Development Journal Vol 8, No 2 (2026): June 2026
Publisher : Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/ldj.8.2.1148-1162

Abstract

This article critically examines party-driven recall in Indonesia’s parliamentary system, situating it within constitutional law, representation theory, and democratic accountability. The study addresses growing concerns that recall mechanisms, rather than strengthening democracy, may reinforce party control over elected representatives. It aims to analyze how recall, regulated through statutory provisions and internal party rules, affects legislative independence and the balance between party sovereignty and popular sovereignty. Using a normative legal methodology, the research combines doctrinal analysis, comparative approaches, and legal hermeneutics. Primary sources include the 1945 Constitution, relevant legislation, party constitutions, and judicial decisions, enabling an evaluation of recall within Indonesia’s asymmetric bicameral structure. The findings show that recall functions primarily as an instrument of party discipline rather than democratic accountability. Political parties use it to control legislators who deviate from party lines, thereby weakening parliamentary autonomy and shifting accountability away from constituents. This effect is intensified by the dominance of the People’s Representative Council (DPR) and the interaction between statutory and party-based rules. The study concludes that Indonesia’s recall system undermines representative democracy by prioritizing party sovereignty over voter accountability, highlighting the need for reforms aligned with democratic principles.