Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.835
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Syntax Idea jurnal syntax admiration
Ahmad Perwira Mulia Tarigan
Universitas Sumatera Utara, Indonesia
Aerospace Engineering Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Automotive Engineering Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Computer Science & IT Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Engineering Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mathematics

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Syntax Idea

 1 
Evaluasi Kinerja Penyedia Jasa pada Pekerjaan Preservasi Jalan Nasional dengan Metode Ahp: Ruas Jalan Simpang Kawat – Aek Kanopan -Rantau Prapat - BTS. Provinsi Riau Riski Anugrah; Ahmad Perwira Mulia Tarigan; Gina Cynthia Raphita Hasibuan
Syntax Idea Vol 4 No 10 (2022): Syntax idea
Publisher : Ridwan Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46799/syntax-idea.v4i10.1966

Abstract

Road preservation activities have an important role in maintaining road conditions so that they continue to function in serving traffic so that they can extend the service life of the road and ensure traffic safety. One of the road preservation activities that affect the success of the work is the capacity and capability of the service provider. The Service Provider as one of the procurement actors is also an important element that must be considered and will determine and influence the success of project governance. This study attempts to evaluate the performance of service providers on road preservation work based on road performance indicators using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method. Service provider performance criteria will be identified as Road Performance Indicators (IKJ), Past Performance (KT), Safety Performance (KK), Financial Stability (SF), and Technical Resource Performance (KSDT). The weight values ​​from the results of the AHP method analysis for each criterion are: IKJ (0.289), KT (0.122), KK (0.203), SF (0.135), and KSDT (0.251). The performance of the preservation work service provider gets a performance score of 2,868 with a good predicate (2 to 3).
Prioritas Penanganan Jalan Nasional Dengan Menggunakan Metode Ahp Dan Anp: Ruas Jalan Bts. Tapteng/Tapsel – Batang Toru – Bts. Kota Sidempuan T. Rahmatsyah Putra; Ahmad Perwira Mulia Tarigan; Gina Cynthia Raphita Hasibuan
Syntax Idea Vol 4 No 11 (2022): Syntax Idea
Publisher : Ridwan Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46799/syntax-idea.v4i11.1991

Abstract

The government's limited budget in managing the condition of the road pavement causes the government to compile a priority ranking of the roads to be handled. Each decision maker has a different assessment for each factor or criterion that is considered in determining the path. This problem requires the same perception from decision makers in choosing road handling priorities. Priority by determining more than one criteria can be done using Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) analysis such as Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Analytic Network Process (ANP). This study seeks to obtain priority handling of the Jalan Bts. Tapteng/Tapsel – Batang Toru – Bts. Sidempuan City using AHP and ANP methods. The criteria used are traffic volume, level of road damage, government policies, handling costs, and area development. The segmentation of the road segment is applied in this study into 9 sub-sections to obtain a uniform alternative length of the road. The results show that the most influential criteria in road handling using the AHP method are traffic volume (0.428), followed by policy (0.192), cost (0.187), road conditions (0.141), and area development (0.052). While in the ANP method, the criteria with the largest weight are traffic volume (0.301), followed by policies (0.196), costs (0.194), road conditions (0.174), and area development (0.134). The results of the two methods also determine the priority of different road handling roads. The results of the ANP method are expected to be a more objective priority due to the consideration of feedback on the elements and clusters themselves.
Co-Authors Fatimah Almadinah Siregar Gina Cynthia Muhammad Faisal Riski Anugrah T. Rahmatsyah Putra