Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Veritas et Justitia Majalah Hukum Nasional
Prita Amalia
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Padjadjaran
Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
INDONESIA DAN ICSID: PENGECUALIAN YURISDIKSI ICSID OLEH KEPUTUSAN PRESIDEN Prita Amalia; Garry Gumelar Pratama
Majalah Hukum Nasional Vol. 48 No. 1 (2018): Majalah Hukum Nasional Nomor 1 Tahun 2018
Publisher : Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional Kementerian Hukum dan HAM RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33331/mhn.v48i1.110

Abstract

Indonesia telah meratifikasi Washington Convention 1965 melalui Undang-Undang No. 5 Tahun 1968. Pasal 25 dari konvensi yang diratifikasi mengatur tentang yurisdiksi lembaga arbitrase International Centre for The Settlement of Investment Dispute (ICSID), di antaranya adalah untuk menyelesaikan sengketa penanaman modal antara para negara peserta (dan warga negara dari negara peserta). Beberapa Bilateral Investment Treaties (BIT) yang disepakati menunjuk lembaga arbitrase ICSID sebagai lembaga penyelesaian sengketa apabila terjadi permasalahan. Namun demikian, pada tahun 2012, pemerintah mengeluarkan Keputusan Presiden No. 31 Tahun 2012 tentang Perselisihan yang dikecualikan dari yurisdiksi ICSID. Keputusan tersebut mengecualikan beberapa sengketa dari kewenangan ICSID. Sebagai hasil penelitian menggunakan metode yuridis-normatif, artikel ini berusaha untuk menjawab pertanyaan mengenai apakah tindakan hukum yang dilakukan oleh Indonesia untuk mengecualikan jurisdiksi ICSID sah berdasarkan hukum internasional yang berlaku. Dalam menjawab pertanyaan tersebut, selain harus dilakukan penelusuran hukum yang utuh menyeluruh, juga diperlukan pembahasan berbagai kasus yang relevan.
INSTRUMEN RATIFIKASI PERJANJIAN PERDAGANGAN INTERNASIONAL: REZIM PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 13/PUU-XVI/2018 Prita Amalia; Garry Gumelar Pratama; Wahyu Agung Laksono; Anindya Saraswati Ardiwinata
Veritas et Justitia Vol. 9 No. 1 (2023): Veritas et Justitia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Parahyangan Catholic University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25123/vej.v9i1.5714

Abstract

The intrusive character inherent in international trade agreements makes the particular form of the treaty unique compared to other treaties. The trade agreements' intrusiveness means the treaty impacts individual rights relatively more than other treaties on its implementation. Confirming such a particular character, the Indonesian Constitutional Court, via its Decision No. 13/PUU-XVI/2018, provides additional criteria for the treaty ratified through an act, in addition to the general forms of treaties. This study comprehensively discusses the consistency of the instrument form and the clarity of the reference regulations related to the procedure for ratifying the international trade agreement in Indonesia after the ruling of the 2018 Constitutional Court Decision. This study uses a normative juridical approach by making a library of data covering principles, laws, and regulations or legal theories relevant to research as the main material. The study shows that Constitutional Court Decision No. 13/PUU-XVI/2018 has allowed the international trade agreement to be ratified consistently using a legislative act replacing the past practice of using a presidential act. Moreover, the provisions on international trade agreements ratification under Indonesian trade law and Indonesian treaty law must be enforced using "lex specialis derogat lex generalis" principle. Although they share the same norms after the Constitutional Court's Decision 13/2018, specific provisions under the trade law prevail over the general provisions of the Indonesian treaty law.
Co-Authors Anindya Saraswati Ardiwinata Garry Gumelar Pratama Wahyu Agung Laksono