Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.562
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal International Journal of Educational Research and Social Sciences (IJERSC)
Sri Setiawati
Faculty of Law, University of 17 August 1945 Semarang, Indonesia
Education Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Legal Policy Analysis Of Handling Covid-19 In The Perspective Of Human Rights Protection Benny Bambang Irawan; Su roto; Sri Setiawati
International Journal of Educational Research & Social Sciences Vol. 3 No. 1 (2022): February 2022
Publisher : CV. Inara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51601/ijersc.v3i1.292

Abstract

The Indonesian government has issued several regulations for the handling of Corona Virus Disease 2019 (Covid-19), which aims to handle the Covid-19 pandemic in Indonesia can run well and be adhered to by all communities. But the legal order issued by the Government of Indonesia in dealing with Covid-19 and the implementation of physical distancing has not been maximal in protecting the rights of the Indonesian people. To prevent the spread of Covid-19, the government asks people to keep their distance from each other, avoid crowded places such as gathering in houses of worship, markets, malls, and not to conduct events that reason many people such as weddings, meetings, and seminars. Against the steps taken by this government, many people think that it is contrary to human rights. This research method uses normative juridical approach methods with data analysis methods using qualitative data analysis. The results of this study show that government regulation should still pay attention to people's rights, such as the right to work, health, and so on. Applying the law in an emergency must be acted wisely, not to debate so that people's rights are ignored. In addition, the role of the community is also needed to remain in compliance with health protocols in a disciplined manner so that the transmission of the Covid-19 virus can be suppressed.
Juridical Aspects Of Complementary Traditional Medicine In Indonesia Bambang Siswanto; Sri Setiawati; Ontran Sumantri Riyanto
International Journal of Educational Research & Social Sciences Vol. 3 No. 1 (2022): February 2022
Publisher : CV. Inara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51601/ijersc.v3i1.298

Abstract

Alternative, complementary medicine is non-conventional medicine aimed at improving public health status, including promotive, curative, preventive, and rehabilitative efforts obtained through structured education with high quality, safety, and effectiveness based on biomedical science, which has not been accepted in conventional medicine. In several hospitals in Indonesia, this complementary medicine has begun to be applied as supportive therapy or replacement therapy for patients who refuse traditional treatment methods. This complementary therapy can also be carried out at the patient's request or with the referral of other doctors. The approach method used in this study, namely normative juridical, is a method of legal research conducted on library materials or secondary data using deductive thinking methods based on truth criteria. Coherent. There is also a complementary therapy called holistic medicine, which is because the form of therapy can affect individuals. The limitations of conventional medicine are one of the reasons why complementary and alternative therapies are an option in treating/healthy Indonesian people. The development of complementary and alternative therapies must be the responsibility of health workers, especially nurses. Legality for complementary and integrated health services must have a Traditional Health Worker Registration Certificate (STRTKT) and a Traditional Health Worker Practice License (SIPTKT).
Judges’ Consideration In Deciding The Case Of The Rejection Of A Deceased Covid-19 Victim’s Funeral In Semarang Sri Setiawati; Bambang Siswanto; Ontran Sumantri Riyanto
International Journal of Educational Research & Social Sciences Vol. 3 No. 1 (2022): February 2022
Publisher : CV. Inara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51601/ijersc.v3i1.305

Abstract

The handling of the dead bodies caused by the epidemic is one of the methods used to control disease outbreaks. The handling of the dead bodies itself has always been regulated in Article 16 of Government Regulation Number 40 of 1991 about Disease Outbreak Management, way before the COVID-19 pandemic happened. The purpose of this paper is to contribute to the advancement of legal science by expanding knowledge and providing references, particularly in the case of the rejection of COVID-19 victims' bodies, which is the subject of Ungaran District Court Ruling number 76/Pid.Sus/2020/PN Unr. This research is focused on these two problems: the legal review of the funeral law and the rejection of a deceased COVID-19 victim's funeral; and the judges’ consideration in deciding the case of the rejection of a deceased COVID-19 victim's funeral. Objectively, this research aims to describe the legal review of funerals and the rejection of a deceased COVID-19 victim's funeral, as well as the judges' considerations in deciding the case of the rejection of a deceased COVID-19 victim's funeral. The research was conducted using a normative juridical method with a statutory and conceptual approach. Primary and secondary legal materials are discussed and researched using an interpretation method with the aim of providing clarity on the existing legal materials related to the problems encountered. As such, the research results were as follows: Firstly, there are adequate laws and regulations for funeral management, including protocols for the burial of bodies due to infectious disease outbreaks. Refusing to bury a deceased COVID-19 victim is a penal act, both according to Law No. 4 of 1984 concerning Outbreaks of Infectious Diseases and the Criminal Code, and is an unlawful act according to Article 1365 of the Civil Code. Second, it was found that the judges decided the case by considering the law, the action, the mental attitude or guilt, and the penality. It is expected that there will be effective public education about the human rights inherent in a person even after death, as well as education about the dangers of stigmatizing COVID-19 patients and victims in efforts to combat the pandemic.
Co-Authors Bambang Siswanto Irawan, Benny Bambang Ontran Sumantri Riyanto Su roto