Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Implementation of Punishment in Improving the Process of Learning the Morals at MIS Ar Ridha Medan Nur Aisyah Siregar; Mardianto Mardianto; Akmal Walad Ahkas
Budapest International Research and Critics in Linguistics and Education (BirLE) Journal Vol 3, No 2 (2020): Budapest International Research and Critics in Linguistics and Education, May
Publisher : BIRCU

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33258/birle.v3i2.1011

Abstract

This study aims to determine that teachers do not provide punishment to children. Punishment that is not given to children is physical punishment. When students make mistakes, the teacher gives a warning and advice to students, but students do not care about it. Then the students repeat their mistakes again, so the teacher is silent and doesn't care about the student in the class. The teacher is only focused on students who want to learn and ignore students who do not want to learn. The research method used is a qualitative research method, using the phenomology approach. The results of the teacher's perception of punishment to make students not make mistakes again and to provide understanding to students that he was guilty. and the implementation of punishment in the learning process that is planned based on a decree that has been determined by the school, namely the principal and agreed by the teacher and students.
Transparansi Honorarium Advokat dalam Hubungan Hukum Klien dan Pengacara Desy Ray Evan; Putri Sari Harefa; Dinauli Adzka Nasution; Rifki Hamdani Siagian; Desta Annisa Putri; Ajeng Pratiwi; Gunawan; Siti Hasna Harahap; Nur Aisyah Siregar; Nurhotia Harahap.
YUDHISTIRA : Jurnal Yurisprudensi, Hukum dan Peradilan Vol. 3 No. 4 (2025): Desember
Publisher : Cv. Kalimasada Group

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59966/yudhistira.v3i4.2356

Abstract

This study examines the transparency of advocate fees (honorarium) within the client-attorney legal relationship in Indonesia. Although Article 21 of Law No. 18 of 2003 on Advocates entitles advocates to fees for their legal services, it sets no standard tariff, leaving the amount to negotiation and creating uncertainty for both parties. Using a normative legal method with statutory and conceptual approaches, supported by sociolegal insight from an expert practitioner, the study analyzes how fees are determined, the factors influencing their amount and form, and the impact of fee transformation on the client-attorney relationship. The findings show that written contracts and the Indonesian Advocates Code of Ethics are key instruments for ensuring fairness and transparency. Fees are set through agreement using schemes such as hourly, fixed, retainer, and success fees, influenced by case complexity, time, the advocate reputation, the client economic capacity, and legal risk. Transparent and proportional fee arrangements strengthen professionalism, protect client rights, and sustain trust, provided they remain consistent with professional ethics.