Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 13 Documents
Search

DISPARITIES OF PUNISHMENT AGAINST PEOPLE OF THE CRIME OF ABORTION (Analysis Decision Number 01/ Pid.B /2013/ PN.Plp and Decision Number 242/ Pid.Sus /2015/ PN.Kpg ) Muhammad Rafandi Harahap; Andry Syafrizal Tanjung; Mhd Azhali Siregar
Journal of International Islamic Law, Human Right and Public Policy Vol. 2 No. 3 (2024): September
Publisher : PT. Radja Intercontinental Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59733/jishup.v2i3.86

Abstract

Various form problems that occur in handling case follow criminal abortion that is exists disparity criminal in matter his punishment . Problem the the source is judge's decision . Power judiciary as something free and independent state power in one side bring huge impact​ positive to effort enforcement law in Indonesia. Writing This use study law descriptive , which is in study This writer use type study juridical normative use method Research data collection References . Study This For know How accountability criminal to perpetrator follow criminal abortion , implementation law to perpetrator follow criminal abortion , in analysis decision number : 01/ Pid.B /2013/ PN.Plp and decision number : 242/ Pid.Sus /2015/ PN.Kpg . Based on results research and discussion then get it picture , that accountability criminal perpetrator do follow criminal abortion arranged in Articles 299, 346-349 of the Criminal Code and regulated in Articles 75-77 and Article 194 of the Law Number 36 of 2009 Concerning Health . Application law to the perpetrator did it follow criminal abortion analysis decision Number 01/ Pid.B /2013/ PN.Plp and Number 242/ Pid.Sus /2015/ PN.Kpg , that before drop criminal to the defendant , the judge has base considered considerations​ from charges and facts at trial . Analysis decision Palopo District Court Already in accordance with the elements charged prosecutor prosecutor general which the judge decides with based charges and facts at trial , vs backwards with the Kupang District Court The Panel of Judges did not consider indictment prosecutor prosecutor second general​ that is elements chapter more dominant proven inside​ facts the judge Because perpetrator abortion No is from power medical or power health so that give rise to oddity rule law in the position process applied law​ to perpetrator follow criminal different abortions​ to two decision perpetrator follow criminal abortion .
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE REHABILITATION PROGRAM FOR NARCOTICS INMATES AT THE CLASS IIB CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION OF LUBUK PAKAM Deskia Renata Br. Sitorus; Andry Syafrizal Tanjung; Rahmayanti
Journal of International Islamic Law, Human Right and Public Policy Vol. 3 No. 4 (2025): December
Publisher : PT. Radja Intercontinental Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59733/jishup.v3i4.172

Abstract

The narcotics problem in Indonesia continues to rise, with one-third of inmates convicted of drug offenses. This study analyzes the implementation and challenges of the rehabilitation program at the Class IIB Correctional Institution of Lubuk Pakam using a normative-empirical juridical approach. The program follows relevant regulations through WHO-ASSIST screening, assessment, staged rehabilitation, and post-rehabilitation. Cooperation with the Titian Harapan Indonesia Foundation has proven effective, with 85% of participants experiencing improved quality of life. Main obstacles include limited qualified personnel, infrastructure, coordination, and funding. Optimization requires capacity building, infrastructure improvement, partnership expansion, and increased financial support.
Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Terhadap Pelaku Pencurian Dengan Pemberatan (Studi Putusan Nomor 776/Pid.B/2025/ PN Medan) Handayani, Cut Ade Irma; Redyanto Sidi; Andry Syafrizal Tanjung
Judge : Jurnal Hukum Vol. 6 No. 09 (2026): Judge : Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Cattleya Darmaya Fortuna

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54209/judge.v6i09.2251

Abstract

Kasus tindak pidana pencurian dengan pemberatan merupakan salah satu kejahatan yang sering kali menimbulkan kekhawatiran dalam masyarakat. Salah satu faktor utama penyebab tindak pidana pencurian dengan pemberatan adalah faktor ekonomi, lingkungan dan pengaruh temen yang menyebabkan individu melakukan kejahatan sebagai jalan pintas untuk kebutuhan hidup. Peraturan hukum tindak pidana pencurian dengan pemberatan diatur dalam pasal 363 KUHP yang mengatur pencurian dengan pemberatan. Tujuan penelitian ini untuk menganalisis berbagai aspek yang terkait dengan pencurian dengan pemberatan, termasuk faktor penyebab terjadinya pencurian dengan pemberatan oleh terdakwa yang dilakukan karena faktor ekonomi, serta pertimbangan yang digunakan oleh hakim dalam memutuskan hukuman bagi terdakwa yang melakukan tindak pidana pencurian dengan pemberatan. Sifat penelitian jurnal ini bersifat deskripsi kualitatif, jenis penelitian ini menggunakan yudiris empiris. Adapun data yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini untuk menganalisis dinamika yang terlibat memberikan hukuman yang tepat bagi pelaku tindak pidana pencurian dengan pemberatan.