Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

Exploring The Dynamics of Insurgency, Belligerency, and Liberation Movements with The Organization of Papua Merdeka Satriyo Kusumo, Ayub Torry
Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol. 13 No. 1 (2025): Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan
Publisher : Magister of Law, Faculty of Law, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/ius.v13i1.1590

Abstract

International Law has developed significantly as there are new subjects in International Law. The rebellion groups that arise from time to time become an important matter to be discussed in the field of International Law, particularly in International Humanitarian Law. The rise of OPM in Indonesia is one of the cases to be studied in international law. This paper aims to analyze the status of OPM in Indonesia from the point of view of International Law. The analysis was elaborated on from the study of insurgency, hostility, and national liberation movements, followed by a legal study to determine the status and position of the OPM. This is a narrative review of literature and the sources are from scientific writings, case reports, and international law literature supported by news and written opinions of legal experts relevant to the subjects discussed. The information from those sources was extracted, classified, and analyzed quantitatively to answer the research question. This study concluded that, despite its history and tactics, the analysis finds that the OPM is not a national liberation movement or belligerent entity under international law. As an internal uprising, OPM must observe Indonesian law. The study emphasizes the need to address the political, economic, and social issues fueling the conflict to find a long-term solution. The Indonesian government should address Papua’s social and economic issues, and Clarifying international law on self-determination is also crucial to avoid misunderstandings that could favors separatist aspirations
Legal Analysis of the International Agreement on Sister City Cooperation Surabaya-Liverpool in Conducting Parallel Diplomacy Ahmad ‘Amar Al-Gifari; Ayub Torry Satriyo Kusumo; Sri Lestari Rahayu
International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice Vol. 1 No. 2 (2024): June : International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice
Publisher : Asosiasi Penelitian dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62951/ijlcj.v1i2.86

Abstract

The sister city international agreement is an implementation of regional autonomy carried out by local governments in conducting parallel diplomacy. The Surabaya City Government seizes this opportunity and, among others, engages in sister city cooperation with Liverpool City. This study addresses the issue of the authority of the Surabaya City Government in making sister city international agreements and examines the strength and position of sister city international agreements in the form of a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) from the perspective of international law. The type of research used in this study is juridical-normative, thus the approach employed is a statutory approach by examining all statutory regulations related to sister city international agreements. The results of this research indicate that through the analysis of statutory regulations in Indonesia related to international agreements, the Local Government, in this case, the Surabaya City Government, has the authority to make sister city international agreements in an effort to conduct parallel diplomacy with Liverpool City. The position and strength of the sister city international agreement between the Surabaya City Government and Liverpool City in the form of a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) under international law are a valid international agreement with rights and obligations outlined therein and categorized as a treaty contract that only creates legal implications for the parties involved, namely the Surabaya City Government and Liverpool City.
Evaluation Of The United Nations Security Council Veto In Cases Of Atrocity Crimes Saffana Khalisha; Sasmini; Ayub Torry Satriyo Kusumo
Prosiding Seminar Hukum Aktual Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia Vol. 4 No. 1 JANUARI 2026
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This research aims to evaluate the use of veto power by the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) concerning human rights violations, particularly atrocity crimes. Permanent member states, such as the United States and Russia, often misuse the veto to protect national interests, undermining the UN’s goals of maintaining international peace and security. Employing a normative legal research method focused on legislation and case studies, the findings reveal that veto usage in atrocity cases obstructs the Security Council’s actions and creates injustices in international law enforcement. The conflicts in Israel-Palestine and Ukraine exemplify how the veto shields human rights violations. The study recommends reforms to the veto mechanism, including establishing an independent assessment body and enhancing transparency in decision-making. Ultimately, it aims to enable the UNSC to more effectively protect human rights and prevent atrocity crimes, contributing to the development of international law and serving as a reference for future research.
ALTERNATIF PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA WILAYAH LAUT INDONESIA-MALAYSIA Satriyo Kusumo, Ayub Torry; Leksono, Handojo
Yustisia Vol 2, No 1: April 2013
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/yustisia.v2i1.11080

Abstract

AbstractThis study discusses alternative resolutions on maritime boundary dispute between Indonesia and Malay- sia. It was based on a legal research, which used statutes and case approach. The research materials were collected by literature study and analyzed by applying the interpretation analysis technique.The result shows that the alternative resolutions of Indonesia-Malaysia border dispute can be carried out through several mechanisms. First, by referring to the UNCLOS 1982, through Bilateral Mutual Agreement on drawing an equidistant line using the equity principle and considering relevant circumstances. Second, by means of ASEAN; and third, by means of International Court of Justice mechanism regarding the equitable principle and relevant circumstances.Keywords: the outermost islands, border management, maritime dispute settlement, archipelagic state ABSTRAKPenelitian ini membahas alternatif penyelesaian sengketa batas maritim antara Indonesia dan Malaysia. Kajian ini berdasarkan penelitian hukum dengan menggunakan pendekatan undang-undang dan pendekatan kasus. Pengumpulan bahan hukum melalui studi kepustakaan dan dianalisis dengan teknik analisis interpretasi hukum. Hasil pembahasan menunjukkan alternatif penyelesaian sengketa batas wilayah Indonesia-Malaysia dapat dilakukan dengan beberapa cara. Pertama, mengacu pada UNCLOS 1982 melalui Bilateral Mutual Agree- ment dalam menarik garis sementara yang menggunakan prinsip sama jarak dan mempertimbangkan faktor yang relevan, kedua,  melalui mekanisme ASEAN, dan ketiga, melalui mekanisme Mahkamah Internasional dengan mengedepankan equitable principle dan relevant circumstances.Kata kunci : Pulau-pulau terluar, pengelolaan batas wilayah, penyelesaian sengketa maritim, negara kepulauan
Mitigasi Resiko Pendakian Gunung Lawu : Penguatan Peran Masyarakat dan Pendaki dalam Pencegahan Kecelakaan Anang Setiyawan; Emmy Latifah; Erna Dyah Kusumawati; Rachma Indriyani; Sasmini Sasmini; Anugrah Adiastuti; Siti Muslimah; Ayub Torry Satriyo Kusumo; Diah Apriani Atika Sari
Jurnal ABDIRAJA Vol 9 No 1 (2026): Jurnal Abdiraja
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Wiraraja Sumenep, Jalan Raya Sumenep Pamekasan KM. 5 Patean Sumenep 69451, Telp. (0328) 673399 Fax. (0328) 673088

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24929/adr.v9i1.4748

Abstract

Kegiatan pendakian Gunung Lawu semakin diminati oleh berbagai kalangan, namun masih minim kesadaran akan risiko dan upaya mitigasi kecelakaan. Kegiatan pengabdian ini bertujuan untuk memperkuat peran aktif masyarakat lokal dan para pendaki dalam mencegah kecelakaan melalui edukasi keselamatan dan identifikasi risiko. Metode yang digunakan meliputi penyuluhan, pelatihan tanggap darurat, serta pembuatan media informasi keselamatan di jalur pendakian. Kegiatan dilakukan bersama para relawan, pengelola basecamp, dan komunitas pendaki di sekitar jalur Cemoro Sewu dan Cemoro Kandang. Hasil kegiatan menunjukkan peningkatan pemahaman peserta terhadap potensi bahaya seperti perubahan cuaca ekstrem, kondisi fisik pendaki, dan minimnya peralatan keselamatan. Selain itu, terbentuk jejaring komunikasi antara masyarakat dan pendaki sebagai upaya deteksi dini dan respon cepat terhadap insiden. Penguatan kolaborasi antara masyarakat lokal dan pendaki terbukti efektif dalam membangun budaya pendakian yang lebih aman dan bertanggung jawab di Gunung Lawu.