Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Online Mahasiswa (JOM) Bidang Ilmu Hukum International Journal of Health, Economics, and Social Sciences (IJHESS)
Adil Sembiring
Unknown Affiliation
Economics, Econometrics & Finance Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Public Health Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
PENYIDIKAN TINDAK PIDANA PENIPUAN JUAL BELI TANAH/LAHAN DI WIALAYAH HUKUM KEPOLISIAN SEKTOR BANGKO PUSAKO Adil Sembiring; Erdianto '; Widia Edorita
Jurnal Online Mahasiswa (JOM) Bidang Ilmu Hukum Vol 1, No 2 (2014): Wisuda Oktober 2014
Publisher : Jurnal Online Mahasiswa (JOM) Bidang Ilmu Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Criminal acts of deception is one of the conventional crime continues to grow in the community, especially the deceptions sale of land in the Police Sector Bangko Pusako region which continued to increase from time to time. This is caused by the increasing population of the Indonesian people that the demand for land increased. Economic needs of the community that are not offset by an increase in welfare by the government is also a contributory factor on the criminal fraud cases this land purchase. In a criminal case the police have an important role as the spearhead of the laws are made in the form of acts of investigation. Investigation is a process of revealing the facts and the evidence for the occurrence of a crime and finding criminal suspects. Investigations were carried out police often encounter obstacles, it is motivated lack of public trust in the police and collisions that occur between the existing legal rules with the rule of law in the society.
Legal Consequences for Auction Winners who Commit Contingency in Auction of Dependents Moh. Faizin; Zhelin Armeta; Adil Sembiring
International Journal of Health, Economics, and Social Sciences (IJHESS) Vol. 7 No. 4: October-2025
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Palu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56338/ijhess.v7i4.9451

Abstract

This study analyzes the legal consequences for auction winners involved in the auction of dependent rights due to the implementation of the execution of the right of dependency auction in Indonesia which often does not follow standard procedures, such as unreasonable limit pricing, lack of notification to debtors, and indications of collusion between creditors, auction officials, and auction winners. The method used in this study is normative juridical with a legislative approach, a case approach, and a conceptual approach. The results of the study show that the panel of judges in the case declared the auction process invalid because it was proven to violate the principles of transparency, accountability, and fairness in the implementation of state auctions. The auction winner is declared not entitled to acquire the auction object due to his involvement in a legally defective process, thus losing the legal protection that should be given to the auction winner in good faith. A judgment ordering the return of the auction object to the debtor is also a form of restoration of substantive justice. Analysis of the verdict using John Rawls' theory of justice shows that the verdict is in line with the principle of justice as fairness, especially in the protection of the most disadvantaged parties and correction of unfair procedures.
Co-Authors Erdianto ' Moh. Faizin Widia Edorita Zhelin Armeta