Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Aqidah-Ta: Jurnal Ilmu Aqidah Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan
Muhammad Adiguna Bimasakti
Mahkamah Agung RI
Religion Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
DOA BERSAMA DALAM PANDANGAN ISLAM Muhammad Adiguna Bimasakti
Aqidah-ta: Jurnal Ilmu Aqidah Vol 5 No 2 (2019)
Publisher : Prodi Aqidah dan Filsafat Islam Fakultas Ushuluddin dan Filsafat UIN Alauddin Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1231.722 KB) | DOI: 10.24252/aqidahta.v5i2.10651

Abstract

Doa bersama adalah berdoa yang dilakukan secara bersama-sama antara umat Islam dengan umat non-Islam dalam acara-acara resmi kenegaraan maupun kemasyarakatan pada waktu dan tempat yang sama, baik dilakukan dalam bentuk satu atau beberapa orang berdoa sedang yang lain mengamini maupun dalam bentuk setiap orang berdoa menurut agama masing-masing secara bersama-sama. Praktik doa bersama di Indonesia merupakan salah satu bentuk pengejawantahan wacana toleransi beragama dalam ragam majemuknya masyarakat. Akan tetapi pada praktiknya doa bersama ini menimbulkan masalah akidah bagi umat Islam. Kemudian Majelis Ulama Indonesia melarang praktik ini dalam fatwa tersebut dengan alasan praktik ini bidah dan bertentangan dengan akidah dan syariat Islam melalui Fatwa Nomor 3/MUNAS VII/MUI/7/2005 Tentang Doa Bersama. Tulisan ini akan membahas mengenai doa bersama dalam sudut pandang Islam tidak hanya berdasarkan Fatwa MUI tersebut namun juga dari sudut pandang dalil-dalil dalam nash, dan juga instrumen Fatwa MUI lainnya yang terkait. Kata Kunci: Doa Bersama, Akidah Islam, Syariat Islam, Toleransi, Fatwa MUI.
LAWSUIT IN ADMINISTRATIVE COURT AFTER ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS BASED ON PERMA NO. 6 OF 2018 Muhammad Adiguna Bimasakti
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 8, No 3 (2019)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.8.3.2019.458-480

Abstract

The enactment of Law No. 30 of 2014 concerning Government Administration very much changes the paradigm of the proceedings in the State Administrative Court. One of the fundamental things is about administrative proceedings as pre-litigation proceedings. Under Article 75 of Law No. 30 of 2014 concerning Government Administration, citizens who feel disadvantaged by a Government’s Decision or Action can file an administrative proceedings, and then file a lawsuit in the Administrative Court. Regarding this regulation, two interpretations arise regarding the obligation of administrative proceedings as pre-litigation proceedings. One party argues that the administrative proceedings as pre-litigation proceedings must be carried out before filing a lawsuit in the Court, and the other argues this is not mandatory. For a period of four years, the interpretation of the obligation of administrative proceedings as a pre-litigation proceedings in Law No. 30 of 2014 concerning Government Administration is floating in the realm of discourse. It was only on December 4th, 2018 that the Supreme Court issued a Supreme Court Regulation (PERMA) No. 6 of 2018 concerning Guidelines for Resolving Disputes Regarding Government Administration After Administrative Proceedings, finally the Supreme Court dictates that administrative proceedings as a pre-litigation proceedings is a must. However, the PERMA does not regulate fundamental things regarding lawsuit after administrative proceedings, namely, who will be seated as the defendant, and what is the object of the lawsuit. In addition, there are also a number of things that needed to be reviewed regarding the arrangements in the PERMA, such as regarding the deadline for a lawsuit in the Court.
Co-Authors