Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Journal of Law Science Enrichment : Journal of Management Community Development Journal: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat LEGAL BRIEF
Yuli Indarsih
Universitas Subang
Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Health Professions Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Public Health Social Sciences

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
Some of The Legal Implications Procedure Regulation no. 15 of 2020 Concerning Stopping Prosecution Based on Restorative Justice Yuli Indarsih
LEGAL BRIEF Vol. 10 No. 2 (2021): Law Science and Field
Publisher : IHSA Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (872.342 KB)

Abstract

The Attorney General Regulation Number 15 Year 2020 Regarding the Cessation of Prosecution Based on Restorative Justice (PERJA 15/2020) stipulates that a criminal case can be terminated if it fulfills certain conditions, including the settlement agreement between the victim and offender has been achieved. Principally, this regulation reflects and implements the process or mechanism of the restorative justice principles, whereby such criminal case finally will be settled through the out of court settlement. PERJA 15/2020 has some implications, among other things, to the code of criminal procedure (KUHAP), the public prosecutor's new role and responsibility acting as the facilitator for the victim and offender, as well as, the efficiency in the process and settlement of a criminal case. The current code of criminal procedure does not stipulate any provision relating to the restorative justice. Therefore, the legal ground for the public prosecutor to terminate the criminal case under PERJA 15/2020 can be found by extending the interpretation and meaning of the public prosecutor's right and authority given under KUHAP, that is, for ceasing the prosecution process and terminating a case due to legal interest reason. In this case, the out of court settlement under the restorative justice has been included in the meaning of legal interest. Due to the additional role and responsibility given to the public prosecutor under PERJA 15/2020, it is required to improve of public prosecutor's skill and knowledge as the facilitator with respect to the restorative justice process and implementation. Ideally, PERJA 15/2020 would be useful not only the efficiency of criminal case proceeding, but also the victim and offender. By recognizing the restorative justice, it is urgently required to reform the laws relating to the criminal justice system comprehensively.
Application of Diversion for Children in conflict with the Law: How is the Criminal Justice system Yuli Indarsih
Journal of Law Science Vol. 1 No. 4 (2019): Law Science
Publisher : Institute Of computer Science (IOCS)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Child law issues have many dynamics and challenges that are contrary to the constitution and human rights, but in the process, criminal acts involving minors have their own way of solving them and one of them is through diversion or protection based on values and rights . In addition to lightening the legal settlement process, diversion also avoids a process that will have a very bad impact on children's development, through diversion it is also hoped that the justice system that is very burdensome to children can be immediately changed and replaced with a process that is very burdensome. It is deliberative, more humane and far from acts of violence that will give a bad stigma to the image of Indonesia's judiciary, this study uses a qualitative method approach by examining several literature studies related to the research objectives, namely to find out how diversion is applied. for children related to law and how the justice system is for the Indonesian people.
Application of Electronic Traffic Law Enforcement (E-TLE) Ticketing System Management at Polda West Java Yuli Indarsih
Enrichment : Journal of Management Vol. 11 No. 2 (2021): May: Management Science
Publisher : Institute of Computer Science (IOCS)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (571.229 KB)

Abstract

The West Java Regional Police, starting in 2020, implemented ETLE (Electronic Traffic Law Enforcement) to raise awareness of safety and to reduce the number of traffic violations. ETLE is the digitization of the ticketing process by utilizing technology which is expected to be more efficient and effective throughout the ticketing process as well as assisting the police in administrative management. The method used is descriptive analysis with a normative juridical approach, in which the writer will describe in full the problems that occur in traffic violations and the efforts to overcome them by the police. In this study the authors will use more secondary data, Meanwhile, primary data will be used as a complement to support secondary data in the form of direct interviews with related parties. The research result of the first problem is that E-TLE has the advantage of being faster than conventional ticketing. The advantage is that this system is very practical and fast, in accordance with the principles of a simple, fast and low-cost trial. The application of the E-ticketing system is to facilitate speed and convenience, openness of the ticketing process or as a substitute for the on-site ticketing process
TINDAK PIDANA PENGGUNAAN SURAT PALSU DAN PENCUCIAN UANG DALAM PERKARA KEPEMILIKAN HAK ATAS TANAH BERDASARKAN PUTUSAN PENGADILAN NEGERI JAKARTA BARAT NOMOR 249.PID.B/2022/PN.JKT.BRT Putri Rizki Ananda; Yuli Indarsih
Community Development Journal : Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Vol. 5 No. 1 (2024): Volume 5 No 1 Tahun 2024
Publisher : Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/cdj.v5i1.25611

Abstract

Tanah merupakan aset vital dalam kehidupan manusia dan dijamin keberadaannya dalam Undang-Undang Dasar Tahun 1945. Untuk menjamin kepastian hukum dan perlindungan, pendaftaran hak atas tanah dilakukan sesuai dengan Peraturan Dasar Pokok-Pokok Agraria (UUPA) yang mengamanatkan perlunya adanya pelaksanaan pendaftaran tanah di seluruh wilayah Indonesia. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis penerapan sanksi pidana terhadap pelaku tindak pidana pemalsuan surat dan pencucian uang berdasarkan kasus balik nama sertipikat tanpa persetujuan pemegang hak atas tanah, sebagaimana yang terjadi dalam Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Barat Nomor 249.Pid.B/2022/PN.Jkt.Brt. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan deskriptif untuk memberikan gambaran yang sistematis, faktual, dan akurat tentang tindak pidana penggunaan surat palsu dan pencucian uang dalam perkara balik nama sertipikat tanpa persetujuan pemegang hak atas tanah. Metode yang digunakan adalah pendekatan yuridis normatif yang mengkaji kecocokan ketentuan hukum dalam praktiknya untuk menyelesaikan masalah tersebut. Hasil studi menunjukkan bahwa untuk menerapkan sanksi pidana atau menuntut pertanggungjawaban pidana, ditentukan berdasarkan pada kesalahan pembuat dan bukan hanya dengan memenuhi seluruh unsur tindak pidana. Hal tersebut sejalan dengan asas tiada pidana tanpa kesalahan atau geen straf zonder schuld. Sehingga, kesalahan dalam hukum pidana adalah faktor penentu adanya pertanggungjawaban pidana. Selain itu, dalam mengungkap tindak pidana pemalsuan dokumen, aparat penegak hukum tentu tidak akan terlalu kesulitan. Namun, dalam perkara Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang (TPPU) atau money laundering memerlukan ketelitian dan kecermatan. Karakteristik Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang (TPPU) merupakan tindak pidana lanjutan, sehingga untuk dikatakan terjadi pencucian uang maka perlu adanya tindak pidana asal (predicate crime).
Co-Authors Putri Rizki Ananda