Felicia Setiawan
Medical Faculty Atma Jaya Indonesia Catholic University, Jakarta

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Healthcare Provider Engagement and Its Effects on Patient Rereferral: Insights from Indonesia Setiawan, Felicia
Makara Journal of Health Research
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Background: In the highly competitive landscape of healthcare, nurturing strong relationships between referring healthcare providers and healthcare facilities is essential for maintaining patient loyalty. This study explores the factors influencing referring health care provider engagement and its subsequent impact on the willingness to rerefer to healthcare facilities. Methods: A cross-sectional quantitative survey was conducted with 181 healthcare providers who regularly refer patients to a private hospital in Jakarta. Data were collected through an online structured questionnaire consisting of 29 questions. The following dimensions were covered: specialist characteristics, practice characteristics, healthcare provider–specialist interaction, patient–specialist interaction, returning referral, training opportunity, healthcare provider engagement, and willingness to rerefer to hospital. Results: The study yielded significant findings, with five out of the six antecedents associated with healthcare provider engagement demonstrating statistical significance (p < 0.05). The most significant coefficient value pertaining to healthcare provider engagement was observed in patient–specialist interaction (β = 0.287, p < 0.05). Furthermore, the analysis indicated a substantial and positive correlation between health care provider engagement and willingness to rerefer to the healthcare provider (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Healthcare providers who demonstrate engagement with the hospital are likely willing to rerefer their patients to the hospital. Therefore, to increase the willingness to rerefer patients to the hospital, hospital management should prioritize fostering engagement with healthcare providers, particularly by improving patient and specialist interaction experiences.
Why Did They Fail? Investigating The Eight Invalid Dimensions of Patient Safety Culture: Mixed Method Research Setiawan, Felicia; Antonio, Ferdi
Jurnal Keperawatan Indonesia Vol 27 No 2 (2024): July
Publisher : Fakultas Ilmu Keperawatan Universitas Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.7454/jki.v27i2.1287

Abstract

Resistance to adopting patient safety culture practices or technologies can hinder improvements in patient safety. This study contributes to enhancing the understanding of patient safety culture (PSC) assessment by identifying the specific factors that render some PSC dimensions invalid and offering actionable recommendations for improvement in healthcare settings. Primary data were gathered using a mixed method of explanatory sequential design, with quantitative data collection and analysis followed by qualitative data collection and analysis. The study was conducted in the leading Private Hospital XYZ, one of the private hospital groups internationally accredited with Joint Commission International with a 110-patient bed capacity. Among the 12 dimensions, only feedback communication about error, handoffs and transitions, and teamwork across units were determined to be valid and reliable. Therefore, eight dimensions, including communication openness, continuous improvement, frequency of error reported, management support, overall patient safety, supervisor/manager expectation, and staffing were explored further through a focus group discussion (FGD). Delving into quantitative and qualitative insights has identified critical nuances that extend beyond mere quantitative metrics. The qualitative insights gleaned from healthcare professionals through the FGD illuminated the nuanced human aspects of safety culture that traditional measurements may overlook. Keywords: anonymous reporting, management of communication, mixed method, patient safety culture   Abstrak Mengapa Penilaiannya Gagal? Menyelidiki 8 Dimensi yang Tidak Valid dari Budaya Keselamatan Pasien: Penelitian Mixed Method. Penolakan untuk mengadopsi praktik atau teknologi budaya keselamatan pasien dapat menghambat peningkatan keselamatan pasien. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk meningkatkan pemahaman tentang penilaian budaya keselamatan pasien (Patient Safety Culture [PSC]) dengan mengidentifikasi faktor-faktor spesifik yang menyebabkan beberapa dimensi PSC tidak valid, dan memberikan rekomendasi yang dapat ditindaklanjuti untuk perbaikan di lingkungan pelayanan kesehatan. Data primer dikumpulkan dengan menggunakan mixed method of explanatory sequential design, dengan pengumpulan dan analisis data kuantitatif diikuti dengan pengumpulan dan analisis data kualitatif. Penelitian dilakukan di Rumah Sakit Swasta terkemuka XYZ, salah satu grup rumah sakit swasta yang terakreditasi internasional Joint Commission International dengan kapasitas 110 tempat tidur pasien. Diantara 12 dimensi, hanya dimensi feedback communication about error, handoffs and transitions, dan teamwork across units, yang memenuhi syarat valid dan reliabel. Oleh karena itu, 8 dimensi yaitu communication openness, continuous improvement, frequency error reported, management support, overall patient safety, supervisor/manager expectation, dan staffing didalami lebih lanjut dalam focus group discussion (FGD). Melalui penggalian wawasan kuantitatif dan kualitatif, telah teridentifikasi deskripsi penting yang melampaui metrik kuantitatif. Wawasan kualitatif yang diperoleh dari para profesional di bidang kesehatan melalui FGD telah menyingkap aspek-aspek budaya keselamatan yang bernuansa manusiawi, yang mungkin terlewatkan oleh pengukuran tradisional. Kata Kunci: budaya keselamatan pasien, manajemen komunikasi, metode campuran, pelaporan anonim