Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal IJIEEB : International Journal of Integrated Education, Engineering and Business NEUTRON : Research from all areas of the Civil Engineering
Anjas Handayani
Universitas Mercu Buana
Automotive Engineering Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Education Engineering Social Sciences Transportation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Comparison of System Methods (Table Form) With Semi Systems from Cost Aspects in the Apartment Meikarta Project Anjas Handayani; Komarul Umam
IJESEMS : International Journal of Engineering Science Educatioon and Management System Vol 3 No 2 (2020): September 2020
Publisher : LPPM NAROTAMA UNIVERSITY, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29138/ijieeb.v3i2.1172

Abstract

Meikarta Apartment Project at the beginning of the implementation of the method that is used is a formwork system so that the spring mounting groove formwork and casting becomes inhibited. With some consideration, the formwork method was changed from the Semi si stem method to the System (Table Form). Therefore an analysis of costs and time in formwork planning is carried out in order to obtain effective and efficient planning results. At this stage begins with field observations, literature studies include information gathering, problem formulation activities, primary and secondary data and data analysis processing with the Analysis of SNI Work Unit Price (AHS-SNI) 2018 To produce the price of formwork work which includes wages, materials and tool. Based on the results of the analysis carried out on each formwork method, it was concluded that the Cost of Formwork System Work (Table Form) is cheaper compared to Semi system. The total cost of work using the Semi system as much as Rp. 4,837,286,252.27 While using formwork System (Table Form) as much as Rp. 3,724,594,795.77. This shows that work using the System (Table Form) is cheaper by Rp. 1,112,691,456.50 or around 23%.
COMPARISON OF CONVENTIONAL SLAB AND METAL DECK COMPOSITE SLAB METHOD TO TIME AND COST IN TRANSPARK CIBUBUR PROJECT Anjas Handayani; Mochamad Elvan Reza
Neutron Vol 20 No 01 (2020): JULY 2020
Publisher : NAROTAMA UNIVERSITY, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

in the implementation of the Transpark Cibubur project, especially in Tower C Apartment there are several problems in conventional slab methods including the need for a longer construction time. With some thoughts and considerations, the work method of floor slab was changed from conventional method to metal deck composite slab method. In this research, a comparative of conventional slab and metal deck composite slab method in Tower C of the Cibubur Transpark Project is the object of research to compare the two methods to speed of implementation and cost requirements. The analysis results show in Tower C 16th to 19th floor for metal deck composite slab method is more expensive than conventional slab method with a cost difference Rp. 137.252.215,54. While in terms of work time, conventional slab method are longer than metal deck composite slab method with a time difference for 25 days.
Co-Authors Komarul Umam Mochamad Elvan Reza