Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Dimensi Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Contrarius
Restu Mufanti
Unknown Affiliation
Education Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
A SOCIAL STRATEGY OF UNIVERSITY LEARNERS OF LOW-LEVEL SPEAKING PROFICIENCY Restu Mufanti
JURNAL DIMENSI PENDIDIKAN DAN PEMBELAJARAN Vol 2, No 2 (2014): Juli
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (219.27 KB) | DOI: 10.24269/dpp.v2i2.155

Abstract

This study is to investigate the learning strategies applied by low-level leaners (LLLs), the results of which can be used as the basis for placing them in an English language speaking class. Specifically this study is to find an answer To what extent do low-level leaners use social strategies in learning to speak English?? Observation and an in-depth interview wereused to collect the data which were in the form of the subjects? spoken utterances (verbal behavior) and their accompanying actions (non-verbal behavior). The data were analyzed using the social language learning strategies (SLLS) proposed by Rebecca Oxford. Three universityleaners from the third semester who are of the same level of proficiency were selected as the subjects of the study. Results of the data analysis show that the LLLs do not use all social strategies in speaking activities. Based on what has been shown by this study, it is suggestedthat supportive teacher behaviors, i.e., building leaners? confident, giving motivation during the teaching, listening attentively to students while speaking, giving hints and encouragement, being responsive to student questions, creating natural setting and showing students empathy need to be provided in speaking class activities to explore leaners social strategies.
Principle of Ecological Restorative Justice in Corporate Environmental Crimes Policies Absori, Absori; Arief Budiono; Maya Khater; Chetan Mukundan; Restu Mufanti
Contrarius Vol. 2 No. 2 (2026): Contrarius
Publisher : Lembaga Contrarius Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53955/contrarius.v2i2.271

Abstract

Environmental crimes pose a significant threat to ecological integrity and public welfare. However, law enforcement utilising retributive justice often fails to address the root causes of environmental damage caused by corporations. Therefore, alternative law enforcement efforts are necessary for more effective outcomes. This research aims to determine the effectiveness of current law enforcement against corporate environmental crimes in Indonesia, examine environmental crime enforcement in other countries, and identify an integrative environmental law enforcement policy model that incorporates the restorative justice approach in handling corporate environmental crimes. This study employs a normative legal research method with three approaches: statutory, conceptual, and comparative. This study finds that, first, law enforcement against corporate environmental crimes in Indonesia remains ineffective due to the difficulties in proving corporate liability, weak coordination and capacity among law enforcement agencies, and low levels of corporate compliance and transparency. Second, compared to Indonesia, Australia, specifically Victoria, has established a more comprehensive restorative justice framework through the Environment Protection Act 2017, whereas New South Wales still relies on judicial practice without an explicit restorative legal basis. Third, Indonesia needs to adopt an ecological restorative justice model that places environmental restoration, community participation, independent oversight, and stringent sanctions at the core of corporate criminal liability to truly realise ecological justice. Therefore, it is necessary to formulate law enforcement policies that incorporate ecological restorative justice principles, prioritising environmental restoration. Corporations should face sanctions and be required to restore damage in a tangible, measurable way, with independent oversight.
Co-Authors Absori Absori Arief Budiono Chetan Mukundan Maya Khater