Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

The existence of legal anthropology in the present Andi Dewi; Arfani Ichsan; Muh Fadlan Fadilc
Indonesia Prime Vol 6 No 1 (2021): Indonesia Prime
Publisher : Indonesia Prime

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29209/id.v6i1.111

Abstract

The era of pluralism shows the development / existence of legal anthropology in the present day. One example of such development is the Indonesian state which has a diversity of laws, namely national laws and customary laws that affect each other. Although sometimes there is a clash of state laws (national laws) with the other laws (local customary law) will be attempted to resolve the problem. But it is also worth noting the differences from legal anthropology and customary law ranging from objects, approaches, nature of research, and norms. In addition, legal pluralism cannot be separated from the plurality of society so that in the determination of national laws, of course, it should not also be separated from the law from society (the concept of legal unification) so that there is a coordinated, more orderly implementation of the law and its performance is expected to increase. In the development of legal anthropology today was initially influenced by the thoughts of Bohannan, Gluckman, and Gulliver directed to the mechanisms and agencies of dispute resolution based on the laws of the colonial government and the governments of independent countries. Then entering the phase of legal pluralism influenced by the views of Sally F. Moore, Snyder, and F. von Benda-Beckmann directed to the studies of legal pluralism beyond dispute resolution. The study of legal pluralism with holistic methods with a focus on the process of law-making, legal norms / laws and regulations, the implementation of law, and law enforcement makes this anthropology very interesting to learn further. In addition, in this legal anthropology also has aspects to dispute resolution both litigation and non-litigation which is certainly very useful to be studied and studied by law enforcement, because generally the law nationally is not formed without any influence from a community perspective
PENGELOLAAN MINERBA DALAM PERSEPEKTIF GOOD GOVERNANCE (TINJAUAN TEORITIK) Muhammad Tanzil Aziz Rahimallah; Andi Dewi Pratiwi; Achmad Fauzi Kusmin
Jurnal Arajang Vol 4 No 1 (2021): Jurnal Arajang Volume 4 Nomor 1 Tahun 2021
Publisher : Universitas Sulawesi Barat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31605/arajang.v4i1.2105

Abstract

Tata kelola pemerintahan yang baik diperkenalkan untuk membantu negara-negara khususnya negara berkembang dalam meningkatkan kualitas pemerintahan termasuk dalam sektor-sektor pengelolaan sumber daya alam antara lain pertambangan. Penelitian ini bertjuan untuk menganalisasi pengelolaan pertambangan di Indonesia berdasarkan pendekatan good governance dan juga memperkenalkan konsep good extractive governance sebagai salah sati pendekatan tata kelola yang baik pada daerah-daerah yang menjadikan pertambangan sebagai potensi pendapatan dan penerimaannya. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kepustakaan dengan menganalisa berbagai teori dan manghubungkannya dengan fakta-fakta pertambangan di Indonesia. Hasil penelitian merekomendasikan good extractive government bagi daerah-daerah pertambangan di Indonesia dimana tata kelola pada daerah-daerah yang menjadikan sektor-sektor ekstraktif sebagai sumber pendapatan mampu membangun sistem pemerintahan yang lebih fokus pada kesejahteraan masyarakat khususnya yang berada di sekitar area pertambangan dan pelestarian lingkungan hidup dan kesehatan masyarakat akibat adanya aktifitas pertambangan.
EFEKTIVITAS HUKUM UU NOMOR 1 TAHUN 2024 DALAM PENANGGULANGAN KEJAHATAN CYBERCRIME DI INDONESIA Muh. Chaerul Anwar; Andi Dewi Pratiwi; Muh. Arfhani Ichsan
Al-Adl : Jurnal Hukum Vol 18, No 1 (2026)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam Kalimantan Muhammad Arsyad Al Banjari

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31602/al-adl.v18i1.20542

Abstract

method by examining the prevailing regulatory framework under the UU ITE and its preventive mechanisms against cybercrime. The focus of this research lies in the tools and instruments employed in the implementation of these regulations, including cyber monitoring technologies and capacity building for law enforcement agencies. The findings indicate that although there has been a decline in certain types of cybercrime, such as phishing, incidents of data breaches have increased. Amendments to the provisions of the UU ITE have contributed to clearer legal protection and a more balanced approach between safeguarding freedom of expression and protecting individual rights. Despite advancements in the structure of law enforcement, significant challenges persist, particularly with regard to limited regional capacity, uneven infrastructure development, and low levels of public digital literacy. This study further highlights the importance of periodic regulatory updates and international cooperation in addressing cybercrime that is increasingly complex and transnational in nature. Strengthening the legal system and enhancing public awareness are therefore identified as key factors in fostering a safer digital environment and supporting sustainable growth of the digital economy.