Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.573
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal SJME (Supremum Journal of Mathematics Education) Jurnal Riset Pendidikan dan Inovasi Pembelajaran Matematika (JRPIPM) International Journal of Social Science, Educational, Economics, Agriculture Research, and Technology (IJSET) Edukasia: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran MATHEdunesa Indonesian Journal of Mathematics Education
Masriyah
Universitas Negeri Surabaya
Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Humanities Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Mathematics Social Sciences Other

Published : 10 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 10 Documents
Search

 1 
Analisis Kebutuhan Sumber Belajar Matematika Untuk Siswa Diskalkulia Sebagai Acuan Pengembangan Modul Berbasis Kearifan Lokal Jayanti Putri Purwaningrum; Syafiul Muzid; Tatag Yuli Eko Siswono; Masriyah; Galih Kurniadi
SJME (Supremum Journal of Mathematics Education) Vol 5 No 2 (2021): July 2021
Publisher : Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Singaperbangsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35706/sjme.v5i2.5164

Abstract

Sumber belajar merupakan komponen penting dalam pembelajaran matematika sebab membantu kelancaran belajar siswa terutama untuk siswa yang memiliki hambatan dalam belajar matematika. Artikel ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis kebutuhan sumber belajar matematika untuk siswa diskalkulia. Artikel ini merupakan artikel dengan jenis penelitian deskriptif dengan subjek penelitian adalah guru, kepala sekolah dan pengawas sekolah dasar di Kabupaten Kudus dengan jumlah empat puluh delapan orang yang dipilih seara acak. Data penelitian diperoleh dari pengisian angket kebutuhan sumber belajar matematika. Hasil analisis angket kebutuhan tersebut menunjukkan perlunya pengembangan sumber belajar khusus untuk siswa diskalkulia yang dikaitkan dengan kearifan lokal Kudus. Modul memudahkan siswa diskalkulia dalam mempelajari konten matematika yang sifatnya abstrak
Students' Mathematical Literacy in Solving PISA Model Questions: A Case Study of Systematic and Intuitive Cognitive Style Dikey Putra Utama; Mega Teguh Budiarto; Masriyah
Indonesian Journal of Mathematics Education Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024): Indonesian Journal of Mathematics Education
Publisher : Universitas Tidar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This research is a qualitative descriptive study that aims to describe the mathematical literacy of high school students with a systematic and intuitive cognitive style in solving PISA model questions. The cognitive style test, cognitive style inventory, and mathematics ability test were used to select research subjects. One student with a systematic cognitive style and one with an intuitive cognitive style were selected with equivalent mathematical abilities and the same gender. The results of the mathematical literacy test and test-based interviews were used to collect data on students' mathematical literacy. Time triangulation was used to test the credibility of the findings obtained. Data analysis techniques include data reduction, presentation, and drawing conclusions. The research results show that in formulating problems, systematic students identify the information obtained from the two questions in more detail and are more careful in understanding the questions, while intuitive students identify the necessary information to solve the problem in general. In applying problems, systematic students design and use strategies to find solutions, identifying known information from the problem first, while intuitive students create and use strategies to find solutions and solve problems using the concept of comparison. For the interpreting aspect, the two students reinterpreted the mathematical results they obtained into contextual problems, stated the truth of the answers they obtained, and provided arguments to support their answers.
Berpikir Matematis dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Barisan Dan Deret Aritmetika Ditinjau Dari Kecemasan Matematika Auliaul Haque; Masriyah; Endah Budi Rahaju
EDUKASIA: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Vol. 4 No. 2 (2023): Edukasia: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran
Publisher : LP. Ma'arif Janggan Magetan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62775/edukasia.v4i2.379

Abstract

The study aims to describe the mathematical thinking process of students who have low, medium, and high levels of math anxiety in solving arithmetic sequence and Series problems. This study is a descriptive qualitative research. The data collection method used math anxiety tests, math ability tests, thought process tests, and interviews to determine students ' thought processes. The subjects of the study consisted of three high school XI female students with equivalent mathematical ability that is medium. The ability of students is measured using a math ability test that contains questions related to Class X material. Students with low anxiety solved the problem well and were full of confidence that the answers given were correct. Students with anxiety are solving problems well despite some mistakes and a little doubt about the answers given. Students with anxiety are solving problems with some errors and are not confident that the answers given are correct
STUDENTS' CREATIVE THINKING PROCESS IN SOLVING MATHEMATICS PROBLEMS ASSISTED BY CHATGPT REVIEWED FROM SELF-EFFICACY Astin Anas; Masriyah; Abdul Haris Rosyidi
International Journal of Social Science, Educational, Economics, Agriculture Research and Technology (IJSET) Vol. 5 No. 8 (2026): JULY
Publisher : RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Creative thinking is an essential component of mathematical problem solving, yet its development remains underexplored, particularly regarding how students with different self-efficacy levels engage in creative thinking processes during ChatGPT-assisted mathematical problem solving. This study aimed to describe the creative thinking processes of students with high, moderate, and low self-efficacys in solving mathematical problems assisted by ChatGPT. A descriptive qualitative approach was employed, involving three Grade XI students selected through purposive sampling to represent high, moderate, and low self-efficacys categories with equivalent mathematical abilities. Data were collected through self-efficacy questionnaires, mathematical problem-solving tasks, interviews, and then analyzed using interactive qualitative analysis with time triangulation. The results showed that students across all self-efficacy levels completed the stages of preparation, mini-incubation, illumination, and verification. However, differences emerged in their levels of independence, idea development, and depth of verification; student with high self-efficacy demonstrated more independent and reflective thinking processes than those with moderate and low self-efficacy. These findings indicate that self-efficacy influences the quality of students’ creative thinking processes when utilizing ChatGPT for mathematical problem solving.
A Phenomenological Study of Pre-service Teachers’ Readiness in Integrating Digital Literacy for Mathematics Assessment Umi Hanifah; Masriyah; Ayu Silvi Lisvian Sari; Nurus Saadah; Jessica Dwi Nur Cahyani
Jurnal Riset Pendidikan dan Inovasi Pembelajaran Matematika Vol. 10 No. 1 (2026): JRPIPM APRIL 2026
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26740/jrpipm.v10n1.p90-102

Abstract

Digital literacy has become an essential competence for mathematics educators, particularly in the domain of assessment. This study aims to explore the lived experiences and readiness of pre-service mathematics teachers in integrating digital literacy into mathematics assessment practices. The research employed a transcendental phenomenological approach to capture the essence of participants’ experiences in designing and implementing digital-based assessments. The participants consisted of six final-year pre-service mathematics teachers from two Indonesian universities who had experience developing digital assessment tasks during their teaching practice. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews, classroom observations, and analysis of digital assessment artifacts, including GeoGebra-based activities and Quizizz assessments. The data were analyzed using a phenomenological reduction process involving epoché, horizonalization, clustering of meaning units, and synthesis of the essence of the phenomenon. The findings reveal that although pre-service teachers demonstrate strong operational skills in using digital tools, their readiness to design meaningful digital mathematics assessments varies. Three main themes emerged from the analysis: technological fluency, pedagogical considerations in digital assessment design, and alignment between digital tools and assessment rubrics. The results indicate that readiness to integrate digital literacy in mathematics assessment involves not only technical competence but also the integration of pedagogical reasoning and assessment literacy. These findings highlight the importance of integrating digital assessment training within teacher education programs to better prepare future mathematics teachers for technology-supported assessment practices.
Penalaran Analogi Peserta Didik SMP Kemampuan Matematika Rendah dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Open-Ended Topik Aljabar Zulfa Qurrotu Ain; Masriyah; Yurizka Melia Sari
MATHEdunesa Vol. 15 No. 1 (2026): Jurnal Mathedunesa Volume 15 Nomor 1 Tahun 2026
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26740/mathedunesa.v15n1.p223-233

Abstract

Analogical reasoning is a person's thought process to draw conclusions by processing information and identifying factual relationships so that it can be used to solve problems. Analogical reasoning is important in solving mathematical problems. However, some studies show that analogical reasoning in low mathematics ability students still requires in-depth research, especially in solving problems. This study aims to describe the analogical reasoning of low mathematics ability students in solving open-ended problems on algebra topics. This study used a qualitative method with a case study approach, in which data were obtained through tests and interviews with one eighth-grade student with low mathematical ability. The subject was selected based on mathematical ability, communication skills, and problem-solving skills. Analogical reasoning was analyzed based on four stages according to Ruppert: structuring, mapping, applying, and verifying. The results of the analysis show that students with low mathematical ability only identify some of the information in the structuring stage, do not find similarities in structure in the mapping stage, use the wrong solution strategy in the applying stage, and do not check the solution in the verifying stage. This research is expected to lead to further studies that can explore analogical reasoning on various topics, classes, reviews, mathematics ability levels, and other open-ended problem categories to gain a deeper understanding of students' analogical reasoning.
Penerapan Scaffolding terhadap Kesalahan Siswa Kelas VIII SMP dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Numerasi Setara AKM Muhammad Rizal Rizqullah; Masriyah
MATHEdunesa Vol. 15 No. 1 (2026): Jurnal Mathedunesa Volume 15 Nomor 1 Tahun 2026
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26740/mathedunesa.v15n1.p57-71

Abstract

Scaffolding is assistance in the form of guidance provided by teachers or adults during learning so that students can independently solve problems and understand the concept material being studied. Numeracy problem equivalent to AKM is problem designed to assess students reasoning skills and abilities in understanding and applying mathematical operation concepts in various everyday problems with the aim of encouraging the development of their self-capacity. This study aims to describe students’ errors, forms of scaffolding, and the results of students AKM-equivalent numeracy problem after scaffolding. Data collection was carried out at SMPN 22 Surabaya in Grade 8th of the 2024/2025 academic year. The subjects of this study were 3 male students in class VIII of junior high school who made the most and varied errors grouped based on the level of students’ numeracy ability, including high ability, medium ability, and low ability. Data collection techniques by providing test problem and interviews. Data analysis techniques based on students’ error indicators. Interviews were analyzed by reducing data, presenting data, and drawing conclusions. The results obtained in this study are that the errors made by students are adjusted to the combination of numeracy problem components between cognitive and context levels with students’ error indicators. The scaffolding provided by the researcher is adjusted to students’ errors in the combination of numeracy problem components between cognitive and context levels with 3 forms of scaffolding, namely reviewing, explaining, and restructuring. The results of the study showed that students experienced an increase in scores and a decrease in making errors in solving numeracy problem equivalent to AKM after scaffolding was given. Several research subjects still repeated the same mistakes even though they had received scaffolding.
Improving Islamic Boarding School Teacher’ Competence in Designing AI-Based Assessment of Critical Thinking Skills Masriyah; Abdul Haris Rosyidi; Nurus Saadah; Abdul Hafidz; Umi Hanifah; Firda Hariyanti; Ayu Silvi Lisvian Sari
MATHEdunesa Vol. 15 No. 1 (2026): Jurnal Mathedunesa Volume 15 Nomor 1 Tahun 2026
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26740/mathedunesa.v15n1.p127-133

Abstract

This study reports a structured capacity-building program designed to improve Islamic boarding school teachers’ competence in designing AI-based assessments for critical thinking skills. The intervention was carried out with 91 teachers across 14 school subjects at a large pesantren —a traditional Islamic educational institution that integrates religious and national curricula—in East Java, Indonesia. The program integrated three components: (i) foundational understanding of generative AI, (ii) explicit mapping of higher-order thinking indicators (analysis, inference, evaluation), and (iii) co-construction of assessment tasks and analytic rubrics through guided prompt engineering. A one-group pretest–posttest design was used to evaluate teacher learning gains. Results demonstrate a very large improvement in teachers’ assessment design knowledge and skills, with mean scores increasing from 37.75 (pretest) to 90.49 (posttest), and a statistically significant t-value (t = 29.49, p < .01). Survey findings also indicate strong positive perceptions of AI usefulness, relevance, and feasibility. Teachers were able to generate authentic HOTS tasks contextualized to Islamic and local cultural values, accompanied by clear rubrics for evaluating evidence-based reasoning. The study concludes that AI-assisted design can meaningfully accelerate teacher capacity to design higher-order assessments in faith-based educational settings, provided that AI is used as a scaffold for human reasoning, not as an answer generator. Implications for scaling professional development and institutionalizing AI-embedded assessment innovation in pesantren contexts are discussed
Improving the Skills of Junior High School Mathematics Teachers in Developing Deep Learning-Oriented Lesson Plans Using ChatGPT Masriyah; Abdul Haris Rosyidi; Ismail; Rini Setianingsih; Umi Hanifah
MATHEdunesa Vol. 15 No. 1 (2026): Jurnal Mathedunesa Volume 15 Nomor 1 Tahun 2026
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26740/mathedunesa.v15n1.p106-113

Abstract

Advances in artificial intelligence (AI) technology offer significant opportunities for education to create more innovative and adaptive learning experiences. Mojokerto Regency, East Java, with over 100 junior high schools, faces challenges in integrating modern technology into learning, particularly in mathematics. These challenges include teachers' limited understanding of AI technologies such as ChatGPT, limited resources, and limited access to technology-based training. This study aims to describe the improvement of junior high school Mathematics teachers' understanding and competency in developing deep learning of lesson plans using the ChatGPT after participating in technology-based training. This study was conducted through training on an introduction to AI (ChatGPT), discussions on the ChatGPT-assisted deep learning of Mathematics lesson plans and mentoring in developing the ChatGPT-assisted deep learning of Mathematics lesson plans. Participants were given a pretest before the activity and a post test after the training. Furthermore, participants were assessed as a group on their performance in developing the ChatGPT-assisted deep learning Mathematics lesson plan. Based on the results of the pretest and posttest analysis, and group performance, it can be concluded that there is an increase in the understanding and competence of Mathematics teachers in using AI (ChatGPT), to develop a deep learning of lesson plan that is interactive, relevant, and supports the implementation of the Merdeka Curriculum
Menilai Kualitas Tugas Matematika Buatan Guru SMP dengan Stimulus Soal Berbasis Literasi dan Numerasi yang Menumbuhkan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Ismail; Tatag Yuli Eko Siswono; Masriyah; Abadi
MATHEdunesa Vol. 15 No. 1 (2026): Jurnal Mathedunesa Volume 15 Nomor 1 Tahun 2026
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26740/mathedunesa.v15n1.p72-80

Abstract

Questions that encourage students to construct meaning and build mental connections tend to foster critical thinking skills. Previous research on junior high school mathematics teachers shows that, in reality, teachers often have not been successful in teaching students to think critically; instead, they focus more on teaching the subject matter content alone. The problem concerns how to improve the quality of mathematics tasks designed by junior high school mathematics teachers in Pasuruan Regency, and whether the tasks developed by teachers have already fostered students’ critical thinking skills. One effort that teachers can undertake is to use literacy- and numeracy-based problem stimuli in the tasks given to students. However, the development of literacy- and numeracy-based questions that can enhance critical thinking skills has not yet been well mastered by mathematics teachers. Therefore, they need to engage in direct, interactive activities with experts in mathematics education, particularly in the field of critical thinking. Through the workshop on critical thinking–oriented learning for junior high school mathematics teachers in Pasuruan Regency, it is expected that teachers will be able to design literacy- and numeracy-based problem stimuli to be used in critical thinking–oriented mathematics instruction at the junior high school level. The results of the teacher mentoring activities in designing mathematics tasks with literacy- and numeracy-based problem stimuli for critical thinking–oriented mathematics learning at the junior high school level are as follows: 16 out of 19 participants (84%) produced stimuli that were well designed based on literacy and numeracy, containing sufficient information to develop questions that trigger students’ critical thinking skills; 2 out of 19 participants (10.5%) produced stimuli that were fairly well designed based on literacy and numeracy, containing limited information to develop questions that stimulate students’ critical thinking skills; and 1 out of 19 participants (5%) produced stimuli that were poorly designed based on literacy and numeracy, containing no information that could develop questions to stimulate students’ critical thinking skills. Based on the questionnaire results, 53.8% of participants strongly agreed and 46.2% agreed that the workshop materials could be easily understood and applied; 76.9% strongly agreed and 23.1% agreed that the workshop materials were delivered in a well-structured and systematic manner; 84.8% strongly agreed and 15.4% agreed that the resource person mastered the material presented; 61.5% strongly agreed and 38.5% agreed that the resource person presented the material clearly and sequentially; 69.2% strongly agreed and 30.8% agreed that the answers provided by the resource person to participants’ questions were very clear; and 38.5% strongly agreed, 46.2% agreed, while only 15.4% disagreed that the duration of the training was appropriate.
Co-Authors Abadi Abdul Hafidz Abdul Haris Rosyidi Astin Anas Auliaul Haque Ayu Silvi Lisvian Sari Ayu Silvi Lisvian Sari Dikey Putra Utama Endah Budi Rahaju Firda Hariyanti Galih Kurniadi Ismail Jayanti Putri Purwaningrum Jessica Dwi Nur Cahyani Mega Teguh Budiarto Muhammad Rizal Rizqullah Nurus Saadah Setianingsih, Rini Syafiul Muzid Tatag Yuli Eko Siswono Umi Hanifah Umi Hanifah Yurizka Melia Sari Zulfa Qurrotu Ain