Suryanti Galuh Pravitasari
STMIK Sinar Nusantara Surakarta

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Students’ Perception Toward English Tutorial Program Activities and Facilities and Its Influence on Their English Competence Suryanti Galuh Pravitasari; Elistya Rimawati
Surakarta English and Literature Journal Vol 3 No 2 (2020): Volume 3 Number 2 August 2020
Publisher : Faculty of Language and Literature, University of Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1059.448 KB)

Abstract

Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta has established its graduate’s quality target as much as ≥ 450 for their English competence measured by standardized TOEIC test. To meet the target, LPIDB as the language center of UMS has provided the students with a kind of speaking activity called English Tutorial Program (ETP). The tutors are active students of at least semester 3 who have got several trainings on conducting the material. This study was aimed at measuring the influence of the students’ perception toward ETP activities and fasilities toward their English ability. The data were collected by giving questionnaires to 200 respondents chosen by using simple random sampling. The data then were analyzed by using multiple linear regression. The result of the study shows that the students’ perception of ETP facilities and activities gave significant influence on their English ability. It was shown by t-value of 4.293 for the perception on facilities and 4.977 for the perception of activities.
Error Analysis on the Students’ English Speech of Stmik Sinar Nusantara Suryanti Galuh Pravitasari; Saly Kurnia Octaviani; Arumsari
Surakarta English and Literature Journal Vol 4 No 1 (2021): Volume 4 Number 1 February 2021
Publisher : Faculty of Language and Literature, University of Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (372.411 KB)

Abstract

This research was aimed at finding out the student’s English speech errors of STMIK Sinar Nusantara using psycho-linguistic approach. This study belongs to the qualitative descriptive research with 30 respondents selected by using simple random sampling. The data were collected by recording the students’ presentation. After that the data were analyzed by conducting observation and classification the errors found in the respondents’ speech using psycho-linguistic approach proposed by Clark and Clark. The result of the study showed that there were 336 (100%) speech errors found which were than classified into Silent Pause (34%), Filled Pause (13.7%), Repeats (9.2%), Retraced False Start 0.3%), Corrections (4.5%), Interjections (3.7%), Stutters (14%), dan Slip of Tongue (20.1%).
Error Analysis on Efl Students’ Essay Writing (Fourth Semester Students of STMIK Sinar Nusantara Surakarta) Suryanti Galuh Pravitasari
Surakarta English and Literature Journal Vol 5 No 1 (2022): Volume 5 Number 1 February 2022
Publisher : Faculty of Language and Literature, University of Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (461.941 KB)

Abstract

This research was finding out the errors made by English Foreign Language students in the essay writing using James’ error analysis. This study was qualitative descriptive research with 30 respondents. The data were collected by students’ mini research report which was then analyzed by observation and classification using Corder’s algorithm. It basically consists of three major stages: recognition, description, and explanation. Finally, the result was classified by using James’ four grammatical error categories. It was found out that there were 200 (100%) grammatical errors containing omission as many as 51 errors (25.5%), addition as many as 18 errors (9%), misformation as many as 105 errors (52.5%), and misordering as many as 26 errors (13%). An error correction activity was also conducted in order to decrease the errors. The result after the treatment was quite significant in which the total number of grammatical errors was decreasing from 200 to 92 containing Omission (22.9%), Addition (8.7%), Misformation (60.8%), and Misordering (7.6%). The main causes of the errors are the lack of the students’ understanding on the target language’s grammar rules and their tendency of using their first language’s grammar rules.