Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

IMPLIKASI HUKUM TERHADAP PERJANJIAN PEKAWINAN PASCA PUTUSAN MK NO. 69/PUU-XIII/2015 Siti Arifah Syam
Al-Mashlahah: Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Pranata Sosial Vol 9, No 01 (2021): Al-Mashlahah: Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Pranata Sosial Islam
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Al Hidayah Bogor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30868/am.v9i01.1152

Abstract

Perjanjian perkawinan adalah tindakan yang dilakukan oleh sepasang suami dan isteri dengan kesepakatan yang jelas dan bertujuan untuk menjaga hak dan kewajiban masing-masing sepasang suami dan isteri yang akan menikah terlebih perihal harta kekayaan yang dimiliki. Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Perkawinan No. 1 Tahun 1974 dan KHI (Kompilasi Hukum Islam) perjanjian perkawinan dilakukan oleh calon suami dan isteri yang akan menikah pada saat sebelum atau ketika perkawinan dilaksanakan untuk memisahkan harta kekayaan menjadi harta terpisah dan bukan bersetatus sebagai harta bersama. Namun dengan lahirnya Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 69/PUU-XIII/2015 telah membawa prespektif baru dalam alur perjanjian perkawinan, dimana pelaksanaan perjanjian perkawinan dapat dilakukan selama dalam ikatan perkawinan dengan melibatkan pihak ketiga sebagai penguat pada eksistensi perjanjian perkawinan. Maka sesuai dengan Undang-Undang Perkawinan No. 1 Tahun 1974 Pasal 29 dan KHI (Kompilasi Hukum Islam) Pasal 47 bahwsanya perjanjian perkawinan hanya dapat dilakukan pada saat sebelum dan ketika perkawinan dilaksanakan. Berdasarkan impilikasi yang telah dilahirkan oleh Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 69/PUU-XIII/2015 perjanjian perkawinan bukan hanya dapat dilakukan pada saat sebelum dan ketika perkawinan dilakukan saja, namun lebih rincinya perjanjian perkawinan dapat dilakukan selama suami isteri masih berada dalam ikatan perkawinan.
War Crimes and Human Rights Violations through the Lens of Maqāṣid al-Syarī‘ah: A Normative and Ethical Analysis Arminsyah Arminsyah; Siti Arifah Syam
Bulletin of Indonesian Islamic Studies Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025): Bulletin of Indonesian Islamic Studies
Publisher : KURAS Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51214/biis.v4i2.1594

Abstract

The crime of war is one of the most egregious violations of international humanitarian law and basic human rights (HAM), significantly affecting individual lives and global stability. From an Islamic perspective, human rights violations—especially in the context of armed conflict—can be analyzed through the lens of Maqāṣid al-Syarī‘ah, which seeks to protect five fundamental principles: religion (din), life (nafs), intellect ('aql), lineage (nasl), and wealth (mal). This research aims to examine war crimes from the perspective of Maqāṣid al-Syarī‘ah and evaluate the extent of human rights violations in warfare that contradict sharia values. Utilizing a qualitative approach and normative descriptive analysis of various international legal documents along with both classical and contemporary Islamic literature, this study concludes that war crimes—including mass killings, torture, rape, and the destruction of civilian infrastructure—directly undermine the primary objectives of sharia, which are to safeguard life and uphold human dignity. Ultimately, this research affirms that Islam categorically prohibits all forms of destructive violence against human values. Furthermore, Maqāṣid al-Syarī‘ah can serve as a normative framework for developing ethical solutions to war crimes on an international scale.
Resolving Authority Dualism Between National Sharia Arbitration Board and Sharia Courts Through Maslahah Arminsyah; Indra Utama Tanjung; Siti Arifah Syam
As-Siyasi: Journal of Constitutional Law Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026): As-Siyasi: Journal of Constitutional Law
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24042/as-siyasi.v61.31910

Abstract

The development of the Sharia economy in Indonesia requires a dispute resolution mechanism that ensures legal certainty, justice, and effective law enforcement. However, the coexistence of National Sharia Arbitration Board (BASYARNAS)  and the Sharia Court has created a dualism of authority concerning jurisdiction, institutional legitimacy, and the enforcement of Sharia arbitration awards. This study aims to analyze the authority conflict between BASYARNAS and the Sharia Court and to formulate a harmonization model based on the principle of maslahah. Using a normative legal research method, the study employs statutory, conceptual, and philosophical approaches through the analysis of legislation, court decisions, and relevant legal doctrines. The findings reveal that the authority dualism originates from regulatory disharmony between arbitration law and religious court regulations, resulting in legal uncertainty and obstacles to the enforcement of Sharia arbitration awards. The study proposes a maslahah-oriented harmonization model that positions BASYARNAS as the institution responsible for resolving Sharia economic disputes through arbitration, while the Sharia Court functions as the supervisory, legalizing, and enforcing authority for arbitration awards. This model strengthens institutional coherence and legal certainty within the Sharia economic dispute resolution framework. The study contributes to the development of constitutional and Sharia economic law scholarship and provides recommendations for regulatory synchronization to establish an integrated, effective, and equitable dispute resolution system.