Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.817
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Jaqfi : Jurnal Aqidah dan Filsafat Islam Respons: Jurnal Etika Sosial Jurnal Ledalero Paradigma: Jurnal Kajian Budaya Binamulia Hukum
Pratama, Herdito Sandi
Department Of Philosophy, Faculty Of Humanities, Universitas Indonesia
Religion Arts Humanities Astronomy Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Social Sciences

Published : 6 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 6 Documents
Search

 1 
Urgensi Kebajikan Intelektual di Era Pasca-Kebenaran: Suatu Deskripsi Analitis Melalui Pemikiran Epistemologi Kebajikan Linda Zagzebski Herdito Sandi Pratama
Respons: Jurnal Etika Sosial Vol 23 No 02 (2018): Respons: Jurnal Etika Sosial
Publisher : Center for Philosophy and Ethics

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25170/respons.v23i02.554

Abstract

Epistemologi kebajikan (virtue epistemology) adalah suatu gerakan dalamepistemologi yang menggeser fokus epistemologi dari semula menekankan padakeyakinan yang membentuk pengetahuan menuju penekanan pada agen penahu.Strategi analisisnya adalah menggagas karakter kebajikan yang disyaratkan dimilikioleh agen penahu dalam proses berpengetahuan. Selaras dengan etika kebajikanyang menekankan pada karakter dari agen moral, epistemologi kebajikanmengalihkan fokus dari properti-properti keyakinan kepada karakter intelektualdari agen penahu. Nilai epistemik dipahami sebagai kualitas dari agen penahuyang memampukannya bertindak efektif secara kognitif dan dalam cara-caraterpuji. Artikel ini merupakan deskripsi analitis terhadap epistemologi kebajikan,khususnya dalam pemikiran Linda Zagzebski mengenai kecakapan intelektualdan kebajikan intelektual, serta mendemonstrasikan urgensinya dalam membacafenomena era dan masyarakat pasca-kebenaran yang ditandai oleh semakinsumirnya batas antara fakta dan fi ksi, serta semakin tidak berperannya faktaobjektif dalam membentuk opini publik dibandingkan bujukan dan preferensiemosional. Artikel ini berargumen bahwa di tengah keniscayaan perkembanganteknologi informasi yang memungkinkan terciptanya era dan masyarakat pascakebenaran,kebajikan intelektual perlu dikembangkan untuk mengaktifkankembali percakapan publik yang sehat dalam ‘mendekati kebenaran’. Kebajikanintelektual tidak diartikan sebagai dominasi terhadap pluralitas opini, melainkansuatu sikap bertanggung jawab dari agen penahu dalam hidup dan berhadapandengan era pasca-kebenaran. Virtue epistemology is a movement in epistemology that shifts the focusfrom its initial emphasis on beliefs that form knowledge towards an emphasis on theknower. Th e strategy of the analysis is to initiate the character of the virtues needed bythe knower in the process of acquiring knowledge. Aligned with the ethics of virtuesthat emphasizes the character of the moral agent, virtue epistemology shifted focusfrom the properties of belief to the intellectual character of the knower. Epistemicvalue is understood as the quality of the knower that enables him to act cognitively incommendable ways. Th is article is an analytical description of the virtue epistemology,in particular, in Linda Zagzebski’s thought about intellectual skills and intellectualvirtues. Th is paper also seeks to demonstrate the urgency in interpreting phenomenaand society in the post-truth era which is marked by boundary vagueness betweenfacts and fi ction and the diminishing role of objective facts in shaping public opinionwhen compared to persuasion and emotional preference. Th is article argues thatin the midst of the inevitability of the development of information technology thatenables the post-truth era and its society, intellectual virtue needs to be developed toreactivate lively public conversation in ‘approaching the truth.’ Intellectual virtueis not construed as dominance against the plurality of opinion, but a responsibleattitude of the knower in life which deals with the post-truth era.
Masyarakat Jejaring, Media Sosial, dan Transformasi Ruang Publik: Refleksi Mengenai Fenomena Arab Spring dan “Teman Ahok” Anggara, Satya; Pratama, Herdito Sandi
Paradigma: Jurnal Kajian Budaya Vol. 9, No. 3
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The information technology revolution has produced a network society that Manuel Castells characterizes as space of flows and timeless time. Network logic is inclusive to various dimensions of human life and is exclusive to those who are not involved in the network. In a network society the public sphere is expanding, dynamic and increasingly interactive due to the Internet mediation. The transformation of public space also spreads political power amongst the public. An example is the birth of various volunteer groups that have extensive networks in a short time without face-to-face processes. There have also been various attempts to embrace as many groups as possible as reflected in the change of campaign strategy and regeneration by political parties. In addition, the democratization in the Arab countries (Arab Spring) was possibly happened due to the transmission of information and public consolidation which was facilitated by information and communication technology (ICT), specifically social media. The questions are, how far is the role of social media as a forum for political interaction in the network and what kind of interaction that will be formed? This article uses a qualitative approach that contains analytical description that will reflect the transformation of public space in a network society, particularly on how the democratization faces opportunities as well as challenges in its process and the role of social media in the new political interaction. Focusing on Castells’ theory of network society, this article shows that the transformation of public space at the political level has led to an existential crisis that engulfed most of political actors at this time.
Relasi Uang dan Kekuasaan dalam Konteks Pertukaran Sosial dan Dominasi Impersonal Eka S Saputra; Herdito Sandi Pratama
JURNAL LEDALERO Vol 22, No 2 (2023): Jurnal Ledalero Edisi Desember 2023
Publisher : Institut Filsafat dan Teknologi Kreatif Ledalero

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31385/jl.v22i2.373.165-185

Abstract

Abstract: This article discusses social exchange in the relationship between money and power, where money as an economic medium can direct power politically. The framework of thought used refers to Karl Marx. However, this research puts forward a method of critical thinking analysis, with a new approach to reading Marx as pioneered by the Frankfurt School. The steps taken include investigation, interpretation, and deliberation within the framework of a qualitative study. As a result, it appears that there is a development of Marx's theory of value from originally related to concrete work to be intertwined with abstract work through the mediation of money. This research also finds that the tangled threads of social exchange in relation to money and power are formed through fetishism. The worship of money as an independent value binds the existence of value to the form of money. This then manifests impersonal domination. Prioritization of money occurs at the expense or neglect of social relationships and human values. To overcome this tangle, it is necessary to reject the logic of capital, which makes everything rely on money.Fundamentally, this rejection refers to universal, particular, and singular frames in Žižek's review. Within this framework, the rejection of singular, specific individuals or groups, particularly operative organizational programs, and protest movements with broad universal alliances must work together to drive change.Keywords: Money, Power, Karl Marx, Social Exchange, Fetishism.
Refleksi Kritis Pandangan Will Kymlicka dan Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Hak Minoritas Orang Asli Papua Herjawan, Hery; Pratama, Herdito Sandi
Binamulia Hukum Vol. 13 No. 1 (2024): Binamulia Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Krisnadwipayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37893/jbh.v13i1.706

Abstract

Orang Asli Papua akan merasa menjadi bagian NKRI apabila dapat berpartisipasi dalam peningkatan kesejahteraan dalam bingkai keadilan dan kearifan lokalnya. Tujuan dalam penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisis refleksi kritis pandangan Will Kymlicka tentang hak minoritas dalam konteks “Nasionalisme” Orang Asli Papua, serta mengetahui peran negara dalam melindungi hak-hak minoritas OAP. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian kualitatif, metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah refleksi kritis untuk melakukan pengujian terhadap kelebihan, kelemahan dan relevansi konsepsi tentang asas-asas yang ada. Penelitian ini mencoba untuk melakukan refleksi kritis terhadap pandangan Will Kymlicka tentang hak minoritas Orang Asli Papua (OAP), serta apa peran negara dalam melindungi hak-hak minoritas OAP. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa walaupun pemerintah telah melakukan banyak hal untuk memberikan perlindungan hukum bagi Orang Asli Papua, masih ada beberapa persyaratan mendasar yang seharusnya menjamin kebebasan bagi OAP yang belum terpenuhi, minority rights yang ditetapkan oleh pemerintah masih belum berhasil karena liberal culture dalam perlindungan hak individu belum optimal.
Exploring the Structural Spread of Close-Mindedness as an Epistemic Vice in Indonesia Arrafi Silitonga, Ferris; Sandi Pratama, Herdito
JSP (Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan ilmu Poltik) Vol 28, No 1 (2024): July
Publisher : Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jsp.80531

Abstract

The post-Suharto era in Indonesia, which spans over 26 years and encompasses numerous leadership changes, has been marked by significant democratic challenges. The period is defined by the rise of populism, increasing polarization, and institutional resistance to open discourse. Sensitive discussions regarding the principles and ideologies of the state are often met with reluctance or outright rejection by governmental institutions. These tendencies reflect a deeper structural issue: the intellectual vice of close-mindedness, as examined through the lens of vice epistemology. This paper argues that close-mindedness operates not only at an individual level but also as a systemic issue entrenched within institutional frameworks, creating a feedback loop between political structures and societal attitudes. The paper examines the relationship between institutional resistance and societal polarization, shedding light on how these elements reinforce one another. Additionally, it investigates the cultural and historical factors that have contributed to the perpetuation of close-mindedness as an epistemic vice in Indonesia’s governance and political culture. Left unaddressed, this structural vice threatens to undermine the integrity of Indonesia’s democracy and further deepen societal divisions. In its conclusion, the paper offers practical recommendations to break this cycle, emphasizing the need for fostering intellectual humility, strengthening democratic institutions, and encouraging open and critical public discourse to safeguard the nation’s democratic trajectory.
Reciprocal Epistemic Failure in Ibn Ṭufayl's Ḥayy Ibn Yaqẓān: Extending Fricker's Hermeneutical Injustice to the Responsibility of the Knower Zalikho Su'ada; Herdito Sandi Pratama; Meutia Irina Mukhlis
Jaqfi: Jurnal Aqidah dan Filsafat Islam Vol. 11 No. 1 (2026): Jaqfi: Jurnal Aqidah dan Filsafat Islam
Publisher : Jurusan Aqidah dan Filsafat Islam Universitas Negri Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/jaqfi.v11i1.46389

Abstract

The epilogue of Ibn Ṭufayl's Ḥayy Ibn Yaqẓān has recently been read as a portrait of epistemic injustice, with Ḥayy cast as the victim of a society that rejects his testimony on account of his foreignness. This article argues that the reading is untenable and that its correction yields a more interesting result. The narrative does not show Ḥayy being rejected: he is brought to the island by a respected figure, received with honour, and heard attentively; what defeats him is not prejudice against his identity but the incapacity of his audience — and, decisively, it is Ḥayy himself who withdraws, apologises to the people of Salāmān, counsels them to hold fast to the literal Law, and returns to his island. The tale is therefore not a critique of epistemic exclusion but an endorsement of it, and it belongs to the tradition of epistemic elitism running from al-Fārābī through Ibn Bājja to Ibn Rushd. Applying Miranda Fricker's categories, the article shows that Ḥayy's case satisfies none of the conditions for systematic testimonial injustice, since he belongs to no stereotyped social type, and that the hermeneutical lacuna in the story lies with the community rather than with him. Rather than abandoning Fricker, the article proposes an extension: what the tale exhibits is reciprocal epistemic failure — a community deprived of the interpretive resources by which the philosopher's testimony could be received, and a philosopher who declines the responsibility of supplying them. Drawing on Medina and Pohlhaus, the article argues that Fricker's framework, which analyses the victim, requires supplementation by an account of the epistemic responsibility of the privileged knower. Ibn Ṭufayl, read against himself, supplies the case that demands it.
Co-Authors Anggara, Satya Arrafi Silitonga, Ferris Eka S Saputra Herjawan, Hery Mukhlis, Meutia Irina Satya Anggara Zalikho Su'ada