Syafrizal S
Universitas Bengkulu

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

The Effect of Reinforcement toward Students' Speaking Ability Herdianti Kusumawardhani; Syafrizal S; Ildi Kurniawan
Journal of English Education and Teaching Vol 3, No 3 (2019)
Publisher : Universitas Bengkulu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (473.193 KB) | DOI: 10.33369/jeet.3.3.299-310

Abstract

This Experimental Research was conducted to find out whether reinforcement can improve the students’ speaking ability or not. The population of the research was the tenth grade students of SMAN 7 Bengkulu. The simple random sampling of the research was taken X MIPA 1 as the Experimental Group. The collection data used pre-test and post-test to see the changes of the students’ speaking score. T-test used to see the significant difference between both tests. The treatment is given to the students a set of praises as feedback in every students oral response. After doing 6 times of treatment on Experimental Group, the result indicates that reinforcement affected students speaking ability significantly. It was found that -Tcount was -18,351and  -Ttable was -2,060. It means that -Ttable score was greater than -Tcount. It could be concluded that the experiment was successful because of reinforcement can improve the students’ speaking ability.
ENGLISH LEARNING STYLES BASED ON GENDER USED BY THE STUDENTS OF ENGLISH EDUCATION STUDY PROGRAM OF UNIVERSITAS BENGKULU Ferly Wahyuni; Syafrizal S; Syafryadin Syafryadin
Lingua Scientia Vol. 30 No. 1 (2023)
Publisher : Undiksha Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23887/ls.v30i1.50559

Abstract

This research was aimed at investigating the English learning style preferences used by female and male students in. It was designed as quantitative research with a survey method. Data were gathered by using a perceptual learning style preferences questionnaire that was adapted from Reid (1984). It had been validated by experts and it had been tried out to other respondents who had the same characteristics as the respondents in this present study to get the reliability of the questionnaire. A total sampling technique was used to involve 115 students of the third-semester of the English education study program of Universitas Bengkulu in the academic year of 2021-2022 in filling in the questionnaire, consisting of 28 male and 87 female students. The results show that the female students used three major learning styles (visual, auditory, and kinesthetic), two minor learning styles (tactile and group), and a negative learning style (individual). The most dominant learning style used by the female student was kinesthetics. Moreover, the male students used five major learning styles (visual, auditory, kinesthetic, tactile, and group), while the individual learning style was negative. The most dominant learning style used by the male students was the group. In conclusion, there is a different English learning styles between female and male students used by the third-semester students of the English education study program of Universitas Bengkulu in the academic year of 2021- 2022. The female students used three types of English learning style preferences, namely visual, auditory, and kinesthetic. Those English learning styles are major learning styles. Meanwhile, tactile and group learning styles are minor learning styles, and individual learning style is a negative learning styles for female students. The most dominant of the English learning styles used by them is kinesthetics. Further, male students used four types of English learning styles, namely visual, auditory, kinesthetics, and group. Those English learning styles are major learning styles. Meanwhile, individual learning style is a negative learning style for male students. The most dominant of the English learning styles used by them is the group. Keywords: learning styles, characteristic, gender, differences, group