Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
1.376
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Masalah-Masalah Hukum Bestuur Jurnal Pranata Hukum Humano: Research Journal Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Administrative Law & Governance Journal Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia
Gunawan A. Tauda
Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Khairun
Arts Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Energy Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 10 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 10 Documents
Search

 1 
Kedudukan Komisi Negara Independen Dalam Struktur Ketatanegaraan Republik Indonesia Gunawan A. Tauda
PRANATA HUKUM Vol 6 No 2 (2011): Juli
Publisher : Law Faculty of Universitas Bandar Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36448/pranatahukum.v6i2.106

Abstract

This study discussed the theoretical construction of independent agencies in 1. constitutional structure of Republic of Indonesia. By using various theories created by some classical and contemporary theorists in term of independent agencies, and limitation of powers themes, as it has been implemented in constitutional law practice and revised in theoretical perspective, the result of this study showed independent agencies are a different branch of government, compare to the conception of Montesquieu’s trias politica. Indonesian constitutional law practice attracts fact about an existence of a different branch of government, where it is referred to as the independent agencies. As a new type of separation of power, theoretical construction of independent agencies could be referred to as "The New Separation of Power. " The result of this study also showed the existance of independent agencies in constitutional structure of Republic of Indonesia is still be placed under primary state agencies, and considered as auxiliary state agencies.
Desain Desentralisasi Asimetris Dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Republik Indonesia Gunawan A Tauda
Administrative Law and Governance Journal Vol 1, No 4 (2018): Administrative Law & Governance Journal
Publisher : Administrative Law Department, Faculty of Law, Universitas Diponegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (597.618 KB) | DOI: 10.14710/alj.v1i4.413-435

Abstract

Abstract This study aims to know the design of asymmetric decentralization in the state administration system of the Republic of Indonesia. The research method used in the research is legal research that uses a conceptual approach. The results show that asymmetric decentralization in Indonesia is a historical continuity that has been started from the colonial period and confirmed to date in the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. As a reality of the practice of regional government, the constitutional juridical legitimacy of asymmetric decentralization can be referred to in Article 18A paragraph ( 1), and Article 18B paragraph (1) of the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia as the supreme law of the land. Asymmetric decentralization concerns fundamental matters related to the pattern of relations between the center and the regions regarding different authority, institutional, financial and control designs. Keywords: Asymmetric Decentralization, State Administration System, Indonesian Government Abstrak Penelitian ini bertujuan utnuk menegtahui desain Desentralisasi Asimetris Dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Republik Indonesia. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian adalah penelitian hukung yang menggunakan pendekatan kosnep (conceptual approac). Hasil penelitian menujukan bahwa Desentralisasi asimetris di Indonesia merupakan sebuah keberlanjutan sejarah yang telah dimulai dari masa kolonial dan ditegaskan hingga saat ini dalam UUD NRI Tahun 1945. Sebagai sebuah realitas praktik pemerintahan daerah, legitimasi yuridis konstitusional dari desentralisasi asimetris tersebut dapat dirujuk dalam Pasal 18A ayat (1), dan Pasal 18B ayat (1) Konstitusi Republik Indonesia sebagai hukum tertinggi negara (the supreme law of the land). Desentralisasi asimetris menyangkut urusan yang fundamental terkait pola hubungan pusat dan daerah menyangkut desain kewenangan, kelembagaan, finansial dan kontrol yang berbeda. Kata Kunci: Desentralisasi Asimetris, Sistem Ketatanegaraan, Permerintah Indonesia
PEMAKNAAN PANCASILA SEBAGAI NORMA FUNDAMENTAL NEGARA Gunawan A. Tauda
Humano: Jurnal Penelitian Vol 9, No 2 (2018): Periode November
Publisher : Universitas Khairun

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (414.395 KB) | DOI: 10.33387/humano.v9i2.927

Abstract

Sebagai hukum ideal dan staat norma dasar, Pancasila (Ideologi Negara) memiliki fungsi konstitutif dan pengaturan. Dengan fungsi konstitutif, Pancasila menetapkan garis dasar tatanan hukum, khususnya konstitusi, dan dengan fungsi regulasi, Pancasila menentukan konten dan bentuk berbagai undang-undang dan peraturan yang semuanya diatur secara hierarkis.
PROBLEMATIKA PENGATURAN “KERUGIAN LANGSUNG” DALAM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA PEMILIHAN (STUDI KASUS PILKADA HALMAHERA UTARA 2020) Gunawan A. Tauda
Masalah-Masalah Hukum Vol 51, No 4 (2022): MASALAH-MASALAH HUKUM
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Diponegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/mmh.51.4.2022.367-377

Abstract

Frasa “hak peserta pemilihan dirugikan secara langsung” merupakan frasa yang krusial dalam keterpenuhan kedudukan hukum pemohon pada sengketa proses pemilihan. Berkaca pada kontestasi Pemilihan Bupati dan Wakil Bupati Kabupaten Halmahera Utara Tahun 2020 lalu, kajian konseptual ini menyimpulkan bahwa pengaturan konsep kerugian langsung terkait kedudukan hukum pemohon dalam Perbawaslu Sengketa Proses Pemilihan mengenyampingkan penegakan hukum, dan pemenuhan aspek keadilan dan kepastian hukum pemilihan, karena itu pengaturannya perlu direkonstruksi. Rekonstruksi pengaturan mengenai konsep kerugian langsung pemohon dalam permohonan penyelesaian sengketa proses pemilihan idealnya dilakukan dengan cara memperluas makna kerugian langsung dalam verifikasi materiil terkait objek sengketa permohonan, atau berupa penghapusan frasa “yang menyebabkan hak peserta Pemilihan dirugikan secara langsung” dalam Pasal 4 ayat (1) Perbawaslu Sengketa Proses, dan Petunjuk Teknis Penyelesaian Sengketa Proses Pemilihan.
Cryptocurrency: Highlighting the Approach, Regulations, and Protection in Indonesia and European Union Gunawan A. Tauda; Andy Omara; Gioia Arnone
BESTUUR Vol 11, No 1 (2023): Bestuur
Publisher : Administrative Law Departement Faculty of Law Universitas Sebelas Mare

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/bestuur.v11i1.67125

Abstract

The speed of the adoption and use of cryptocurrency that utilizes blockchain technology as its central infrastructure is expanding globally, including in Indonesia. It has promising prospects as a future asset and payment instrument. However, the regulations in Indonesia are often delayed and inadequate for dealing with cryptocurrency's developments. This research is intended to analyze the approaches, regulations, and protection of the use of cryptocurrency. This study argues that the regulatory approach to using cryptocurrency is balanced, while Indonesia has a partial status in cryptocurrency legality. The government’s protection of cryptocurrency investors is adequate in using cryptocurrency as a commodity traded on futures exchanges with a license from Bappebti. A progressive policy for establishing the Digital Asset Law by the government is important due to the resultant clarity in the regulatory status of cryptocurrency will allow the ecosystem to grow and promote innovation, thus harnessing the benefits of cryptocurrency while mitigating related risks.
Theoretical Reconstruction of the ’Existence of the Indonesian Corruption Eradication Commission and Its Comparison to Other Anti-Corruption Agencies in Asia Gunawan A. Tauda; Ni'matul Huda; Andy Omara
PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Vol 10, No 2 (2023): PADJADJARAN JURNAL ILMU HUKUM (JOURNAL OF LAW)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Padjadjaran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Article 3 of the Indonesian Law Number 19 of 2019 stipulates that the Corruption Eradication Commission is a state institution within the executive power branch, which in carrying out its duties and authorities is independent and free from the influence of any power. The basic arrangement is not without problems, considering the institutional design of the Corruption Eradication Commission was initially stated in the Law Number 30 of 2002 “…a state institution, which in carrying out its duties and authorities is independent…,” becomes “…state institutions within the executive power branch….” The stipulation in Article 3, also the basic article of the law was confirmed by the Constitutional Court in Verdict Number 70/PUU-XVII/2019. This study aims to answer problems of theoretical construction of the commission after the Constitutional Court Verdict Number 70/PUU-XVII/2019. This study used the normative legal research method. The study concluded that, theoretically, there was a shift in the institutional design of the commission, from an independent agency to an independent executive organ, equivalent to the National Police and the Attorney General’s Office of Indonesia. The change is a setback in corruption eradication. Compared to other anti-corruption agencies in Asia, the institutional design is not an ideal condition or best practice. Therefore, legislators should restore the commission as an independent agency.DOI: https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v10n2.a2
Kekuatan Mengikat Pertimbangan Hukum Putusan Mahkamah Konsitusi dalam Perkara Pengujian Undang-Undang (Studi Putusan Nomor 20/PUU-XIX/2021) Gunawan A. Tauda
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 31 No. 2: MEI 2024
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/iustum.vol31.iss2.art6

Abstract

The Constitutional Court has the authority to determine the addressed subject in order to make adjustments to laws that have been assessed or interpreted for their constitutionality. This determination usually only applies to applications that are granted and not applications that are rejected in their entirety. In Decision Number 20/PUU-XIX/2021 (Case for Reviewing Article 50 paragraph (4) of Law Number 14 of 2005 on Teachers and Lecturers in conformity with the 1945 Constitution), the Court emphasized in the Legal Considerations section two facts that were proven to be sufficiently justified in accordance with the law, which then became the basis for the Court to instruct the addressed subject to be adjusted. The issue to be addressed in this study is, do the legal considerations (Court Opinion) in the decision have the similar legally binding force as the decisive ruling. This is a normative legal research, accompanied by the use of a statutory approach, a case approach, and a conceptual approach. The results of the study indicate that based on the implementation of Decision Number 20/PUU-XIX/2021, legal reasoning, both ratio decidendi and obiter dicta, have the same legally binding force as the ruling. Legal considerations in a decision can be a "formal legal source" in the preparation of decisions and/or state administrative actions, and become a guideline (morally binding) in the formation of PERPU and laws. Specifically for constitutional courts, legal considerations are perfectly binding on the addressed subject if desired by the Court, especially because legal considerations are an authentic interpretation of the judge regarding a case of the constitutionality of a law. The Court's legal considerations therefore need to be positioned as the basis for regulating (legally binding) the formation of laws, so that explicit affirmation is needed in the relevant laws, especially the Constitutional Court Law regarding the binding force of legal considerations as an inseparable part of the decision.Keywords: Constitutional Court, Judicial Decisions, Legal Considerations. AbstrakMahkamah Konstitusi dapat menetapkan adressat putusan untuk melakukan penyesuaian terhadap undang-undang yang telah dinilai atau ditafsirkan konstitusionalitasnya. Penetapan ini, lazimnya hanya berlaku kepada permohonan yang dikabulkan dan bukan permohonan yang ditolak untuk seluruhnya. Pada Putusan Nomor 20/PUU-XIX/2021 (Perkara Pengujian Pasal 50 ayat (4) Undang-Undang Nomor 14 Tahun 2005 tentang Guru dan Dosen terhadap UUD 1945), dalam bagian Pertimbangan Hukum, Mahkamah menegaskan dua fakta yang terbukti cukup beralasan menurut hukum, yang kemudian menjadi dasar Mahkamah menginstruksikan kepada adressat putusan untuk ditindaklajuti. Permasalahan yang ingin dijawab dalam penelitian ini adalah apakah pertimbangan hukum (Pendapat Mahkamah) dalam putusan memiliki kekuatan hukum mengikat yang sama sebagaimana amar putusan. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif yang disertai penggunaan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan, pendekatan kasus, dan pendekatan konseptual. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan, berdasarkan implementasi Putusan Nomor 20/PUU-XIX/2021, pertimbangan hukum (legal reasoning), baik yang bersifat ratio decidendi maupun obiter dicta, memiliki kekuatan hukum mengikat yang sama sebagaimana amar putusan. Pertimbangan hukum dalam putusan dapat menjadi ‘sumber hukum formil’ dalam penyusunan keputusan dan/atau tindakan tata usaha negara, dan menjadi pedoman (morally binding) dalam pembentukan perppu dan undang-undang. Khusus peradilan konstitusional, pertimbangan hukum mengikat secara sempurna terhadap adressat putusan apabila dikehendaki oleh Mahkamah, terutama karena pertimbangan hukum merupakan tafsiran atau interpretasi otentik hakim terhadap suatu perkara konstitusionalitas undang-undang. Pertimbangan hukum Mahkamah, karenanya perlu diposisikan sebagai dasar pengaturan (legally binding) pembentukan undang-undang, sehingga diperlukan penegasan secara eksplisit dalam undang-undang terkait, terutama Undang-Undang Mahkamah Konstitusi perihal kekuatan mengikat pertimbangan hukum sebagai bagian tidak terpisahkan dari putusan.Kata Kunci: Mahkamah Konstitusi, Pertimbangan Hukum, Putusan Peradilan.
INSTITUTIONAL DESIGN OF THE REGIONAL HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES (DPRD): LEGAL POLITICAL STUDY ON INDONESIA’S LAW NUMBER 23 OF 2014 CONCERNING REGIONAL GOVERNMENT Gunawan A. Tauda; Amirudin Umasangaji; Nam Rumkel; Nurul Istiqamallah
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 11, No 1 (2022)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.11.1.2022.1-20

Abstract

By the promulgation of Law Number 23 of 2014 concerning Regional Government, there has been a shift in the institutional design of the Regional House of Representatives (DPRD in Bahasa Indonesia), especially in the aspects of the legislative function and its authority. There is an affirmation of the understanding of the DPRD as an element of regional government administration. In this context, the House of Representatives (DPR in Bahasa Indonesia) and the President deliberately combine the two types of power functions, the legislative and the executive, into one institution called the DPRD in the local government system in Indonesia. Shifting of institutional design above indicates that Regional Government Law is principally no longer categorizes the DPRD as a legislative agency but instead as an executive institution playing a role in supervising the implementation of Regional Government. Based on this Regulation, the theoretical interpretation of DPRD’s existence is interpreted as an executive institution running the legislative function.
PROBLEMATIKA DUALITAS PENGATURAN UNSUR IKLAN KAMPANYE PEMILIHAN UMUM (KEBERLAKUAN FRASA “VISI, MISI, DAN PROGRAM” DALAM PKPU 23 TAHUN 2018, VERSUS “CITRA DIRI” DALAM PERBAWASLU 28 TAHUN 2018) Tauda, Gunawan A.
Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia Vol 16, No 3 (2019): Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia - September 2019
Publisher : Direktorat Jenderal Peraturan Perundang-undang, Kementerian Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54629/jli.v16i3.496

Abstract

Pada praktik penyelenggaraan Pemilu Serentak 2019 lalu, pengaturan mengenai unsur iklan kampanye pemilu secara substansial diatur secara berbeda oleh KPU sebagai pelaksana pemilu dan Bawaslu sebagai pengawas pemilu, sehingga perlu dianalisis dualitas pengaturan dimaksud dan kesesuaiannya terhadap Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2017 tentang Pemilihan Umum. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa keberlakuan Pasal 37 ayat (2) PKPU Nomor 23 Tahun 2018 yang menentukan: “Materi Iklan Kampanye sebagaimana dimaksud pada ayat (1) paling sedikit memuat visi, misi, dan program Peserta Pemilu”, berkesesuaian dengan pengaturan pada Undang-Undang Pemilu. Sedangkan, keberlakuan Pasal 1 angka 25 Perbawaslu Nomor 28 Tahun 2018 yang menentukan: “Citra Diri adalah setiap alat peraga atau materi lainnya yang mengandung unsur logo dan/atau gambar serta nomor urut Peserta Pemilu”, tidak sesuai dengan pengaturan pada Undang-Undang Pemilu sepanjang terbatas pada pengawasan terhadap pelaksanaan iklan kampanye pemilu sebelum Masa Tenang (23 September 2018—13 April 2019, 24 Maret 2019—13 April 2019). Meskipun konsep citra diri tidak dapat diterapkan pada peristiwa hukum konkrit kepemiluan pada rentang waktu dimaksud, keberlakuannya mengikat sepanjang dimaknai terbatas pada aspek pengawasan terhadap pemberitaan dan penyiaran iklan kampanye oleh media selama Masa Tenang (14—16 April 2019). Dualitas tersebut berdampak secara signifikan terhadap melemahnya upaya penindakan pelanggaran kampanye pemilu melalui iklan kampanye di media oleh Bawaslu. Akar permasalahan dualitas pengaturan dimaksud terletak pada kelalaian pembentuk undang-undang dalam menormakan konsep citra diri Peserta Pemilu dalam ketentuan Pasal 274 ayat (1) Undang-Undang Pemilu.
REFORMULASI PENGISIAN JABATAN ANGGOTA DEWAN PERWAKILAN RAKYAT DAERAH MELALUI PEMILIHAN SERENTAK LOKAL Tauda, Gunawan A.
Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia Vol 18, No 1 (2021): Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia - Maret 2021
Publisher : Direktorat Jenderal Peraturan Perundang-undang, Kementerian Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54629/jli.v18i1.680

Abstract

The 2019 concurrent elections became the biggest history of Indonesia's democracy. However, the simultaneous election provisions stipulated in Election Law have complexity, and at the same time have a heavy technical implementation impact for the organizers and voters. On the other hand, the meaning of the Regional House of Representatives (DPRD) as an element of regional government administration through the Regional Government Law opens conceptual space to initiate alternative patterns of filling their positions through regional simultaneous electoral mechanisms. This alternative pattern is intended to reformulate the mechanism for the implementation of general elections for DPRD members, which were previously held simultaneously in national elections, then carried out congruently on the same day as the regional elections. This can be implemented through changes to the Election Law, without having to change the 1945 Constitution. Substantially, the amendment is limited to the time aspect of elections for DPRD members.
Co-Authors Amirudin Umasangaji Andy Omara Andy Omara Gioia Arnone Nam Rumkel Ni'matul Huda Nurul Istiqamallah