Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Yurispruden: Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Malang Jurnal Magister Hukum Perspektif
Aditya Wiguna Sanjaya
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
MENYOAL PENGATURAN PEMBERIAN BANTUAN HUKUM TERHADAP ANAK PASCA REFORMASI Aditya Wiguna Sanjaya
Yurispruden: Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Malang Vol 2, No 2 (2019): Yurispruden : Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Malang
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (185.156 KB) | DOI: 10.33474/yur.v2i2.2789

Abstract

ABSTRACTThe regulation regarding legal assistance for children has basically been stated in Law Number 11 of 2012, however in the formulation of regulation it appears that there is a contradiction between the meaning of legal assistance as legal rights and assistance as an obligation, especially in the context of legal assistance as an obligation attached to law enforcement officers. The purpose is to analyze whether the regulation of providing legal assistance to children in Law Number 11 of 2012 is in accordance with the principle of the best interest of the child, and provides ideas for formulating arrangements for providing legal assistance to children in the future. This paper using normative legal research methods with a legal approach and conceptual approach. The ideal arrangement in the future can be done by reformulating arrangements regarding existing legal assistance for children, namely eliminating legal aid as children's rights in the criminal justice system and formulating legal consequences in the form of illegal actions taken by law enforcement officials at every level of examination.Key words: Regulation, Legal assistance, Children ABSTRAKPengaturan bantuan hukum terhadap anak telah dituangkan dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012, namun dalam formulasi pengaturan tersebut tampak adanya pertentangan makna antara bantuan hukum sebagai hak dan bantuan hukum sebagai kewajiban, terlebih dalam konteks bantuan hukum sebagai kewajiban yang melekat pada aparat penegak hukum. Tujuan penulisan ini yaitu untuk menganalisis apakah pengaturan pemberian bantuan hukum terhadap anak dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 telah sesuai dengan prinsip the best interest of the child dan memberikan gagasan formulasi pengaturan pemberian bantuan hukum terhadap anak di masa yang akan datang. Dalam penulisan makalah ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konseptual. Pengaturan ideal di masa mendatang dapat dilakukan dengan mereformulasi kembali pengaturan mengenai bantuan hukum terhadap anak yang ada yaitu menghapuskan bantuan hukum sebagai hak anak dalam sistem peradilan pidana dan memformulasikan akibat hukum berupa tidak sahnya tindakan yang dilakukan aparat penegak hukum dalam setiap tingkat pemeriksaan.Kata Kunci: Pengaturan, Bantuan Hukum, Anak
MENYOAL PENGATURAN PEMBERIAN BANTUAN HUKUM TERHADAP ANAK PASCA REFORMASI Aditya Wiguna Sanjaya
Yurispruden: Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Malang Vol 2 No 2 (2019): Yurispruden: Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Malang
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33474/yur.v2i2.2789

Abstract

ABSTRACTThe regulation regarding legal assistance for children has basically been stated in Law Number 11 of 2012, however in the formulation of regulation it appears that there is a contradiction between the meaning of legal assistance as legal rights and assistance as an obligation, especially in the context of legal assistance as an obligation attached to law enforcement officers. The purpose is to analyze whether the regulation of providing legal assistance to children in Law Number 11 of 2012 is in accordance with the principle of the best interest of the child, and provides ideas for formulating arrangements for providing legal assistance to children in the future. This paper using normative legal research methods with a legal approach and conceptual approach. The ideal arrangement in the future can be done by reformulating arrangements regarding existing legal assistance for children, namely eliminating legal aid as children's rights in the criminal justice system and formulating legal consequences in the form of illegal actions taken by law enforcement officials at every level of examination.Key words: Regulation, Legal assistance, Children ABSTRAKPengaturan bantuan hukum terhadap anak telah dituangkan dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012, namun dalam formulasi pengaturan tersebut tampak adanya pertentangan makna antara bantuan hukum sebagai hak dan bantuan hukum sebagai kewajiban, terlebih dalam konteks bantuan hukum sebagai kewajiban yang melekat pada aparat penegak hukum. Tujuan penulisan ini yaitu untuk menganalisis apakah pengaturan pemberian bantuan hukum terhadap anak dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 telah sesuai dengan prinsip the best interest of the child dan memberikan gagasan formulasi pengaturan pemberian bantuan hukum terhadap anak di masa yang akan datang. Dalam penulisan makalah ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konseptual. Pengaturan ideal di masa mendatang dapat dilakukan dengan mereformulasi kembali pengaturan mengenai bantuan hukum terhadap anak yang ada yaitu menghapuskan bantuan hukum sebagai hak anak dalam sistem peradilan pidana dan memformulasikan akibat hukum berupa tidak sahnya tindakan yang dilakukan aparat penegak hukum dalam setiap tingkat pemeriksaan.Kata Kunci: Pengaturan, Bantuan Hukum, Anak
DISHARMONI PENGATURAN TINDAK PIDANA POLITIK UANG DALAM UNDANG-UNDANG PEMILU DAN UNDANG-UNDANG PILKADA Aditya Wiguna Sanjaya
Jurnal Magister Hukum Perspektif Vol. 16 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : Magister Ilmu Hukum, Universitas Wisnuwardhana Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37303/magister.v16i1.118

Abstract

The regulatory dichotomy between regional elections and general elections for the president, vice president, members of the DPR, DPRD and DPD (elections) has led to differences in arrangements between the two, one of which is regarding regulation of money politics, which in this case is interpreted as an attempt to give or promise something to voters to not exercise their right to vote or vote for a particular candidate. Arrangements regarding the prohibition of giving or promising something to voters not to exercise their right to vote or vote for certain candidates in the Pilkada Law are formed in pairs, both for the giver and also for the recipient, namely as stipulated in Article 187 A paragraph (1) and paragraph (2) of the Pilkada Law, while for the same material actions the Election Law only contains a prohibition for the giving party, as stipulated in Article 523 of the Election Law, while for the receiving party there are no prohibitions or criminal sanctions in the a quo law. This shows that there is disharmony between the Pilkada Law and the Election Law, especially in the Election Law it appears that there is a legal vacuum (vacuum of norm) regarding the prohibition for receiving parties in the practice of money politics. This research departs from two problems. First, is the regulation of money politics as a crime in the Election Law reflecting justice. Second, what is the ideal policy for formulating money politics in the context of ius constituendum? The research method used in writing this paper is normative research method. The results of the study show that the regulation of money politics as a crime in the Election Law does not yet reflect justice, for this reason it is necessary to reconstruct the regulation of money politics in the future Election Law, namely by criminalizing passive money politics. Keywords: Disharmony, Crime, Money Politics, Elections
Co-Authors