Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal SOSIOEDUKASI : JURNAL ILMIAH ILMU PENDIDIKAN DAN SOSIAL Activa Yuris: Jurnal Hukum
Hufron
Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya
Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
IMPLICATIONS OF PERMA NUMBER 7 OF 2022 CONCERNING. ADMINISTRATION OF CASES AND TRIALS. JUDGMENT AS WELL. ELECTRONICS AGAINST. PRINCIPLES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE LAW: IMPLIKASI PERMA NOMOR 7 TAHUN 2022 TENTANG. ADMINISTRASI PERKARA DAN PERSIDANGAN. PENGADILAN SECARA. ELEKTRONIK TERHADAP. ASAS-ASAS HUKUM ACARA PERDATA Yogo Risnandri; Hufron
SOSIOEDUKASI Vol 13 No 1 (2024): SOSIOEDUKASI : JURNAL ILMIAH ILMU PENDIDIKAN DAN SOSIAL
Publisher : Fakultas Keguruan Dan Ilmu Pendidikan Universaitas PGRI Banyuwangi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36526/sosioedukasi.v13i1.3900

Abstract

Background: There is a growing need for courts to implement electronic-based administration, or E-Court, as technology advances. Objective: To understand, study and analyze whether PERMA Number 7 of 2022 regarding Electronic Administration and Trial of Cases in Court complies with Indonesian civil procedural law principles. Method: Qualitative research with a normative legal perspective demonstrates that e-court use can typically increase judicial efficiency. Result: Some applications are still opposite from the principles of civil procedural law, HIR and RBG. This condition can be seen in the implementation of the principle of open hearings to the public in the court, the application of the Nemo Judex Idoneus in Propria Causa principle, and SEMA 1 of 2023 concerning Surat Tercatat (Registered Letters), which violate the provisions in the HIR and RBG. Conclusion: This situation makes sense because it will take time to create new civil procedural laws and there is an urgent need to improve the court's efficacy and efficiency.
Legal Consequences of Carry-Over Actions in the Legislative Process Krisna Tanjung; Hufron
Activa Yuris: Jurnal Hukum Vol. 6 No. 2 (2026)
Publisher : Universitas PGRI Madiun

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Drafting a bill requires a mechanism for drafting laws through a process that is not easy. Prolegnas is the first step to determine which bills can be drafted using the concept of transfer is some form of legal policy in the legislature. The concept of transfer of law must be able to complement the process of establishing a legal order, of course also taking into account the efficiency and sustainability of development planning within the framework of the national legislation program. The significantly increased number of laws included in the National Legislation Program but not finalized in the DPR is the reason for the start of the carry over mechanism. Considering that one of the conditions for a bill to be expelled is that it has reached the discussion stage of the Problem Inventory List (DIM) during the DPR's membership period. This is stated in Article 71A of Law Number 15 of 2019 concerning the Bill, which was terminated in the Level I Discussion stage in 2019. The provisions of Article 71A of Law Number 15 of 2019 regarding the concept of carry over must be considered carefully. Article 71A of Law Number 15 of 2019 regulates the conditions. This condition led to the conclusion that not all bills that have reached the Level I Discussion stage or the DIM discussion stage can be forwarded to the 2020–2020 medium-term National Legislation Program and the annual priority Prolegnas.
Co-Authors Krisna Tanjung Yogo Risnandri