MUAMAR ALAY IDRUS
Universitas Gunung Rinjani

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

KEABSAHAN, KEPASTIAN HUKUM DAN PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM ATAS PERWAKAFAN YANG TIDAK TERCATAT ( STUDI KASUS PRAKTEK PERWAKAFAN TANAH DI KECAMATAN SUKAMULIA) Muammar Alay Idrus
Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol 5, No 1 (2017)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (745.431 KB) | DOI: 10.29303/ius.v5i1.342

Abstract

Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah Untuk mengetahui keabsahan Perwakafan tanah yang dilakukan di Kecamatan Sukamulia dan Untuk mengetahui Kepastian hukum dan perlindungan hukum atas tanah  wakaf yang tidak tercatat. Metode yang digunakana adalah normatif-empiris yaitu mengkaji tentang implementasi hukum normatif (undang-undang) dalam aksinya pada setiap peristiwa hukum tertentu yang terjadi dalam suatu masyarakat. hasil dari penelitian ini adalah menurut hukum islam wakaf yang tidak tercatat adalah sah selama memenuhi rukun dan syatat dalam wakaf, sedangkan menurut hukum postif wakaf harus tercatat sebagai syarat telah terjadinya perwakafan, selanjutnya pendaftaran tanah wakaf adalah element penting dalam mempperoleh kepastian dan perllindungan hukum atas tanah wakaf. Kedepepan semua pihak diharapkan memiliki pemahaman yang benar tentang tata cara dan proses berwakaf yang baik dan benar, dimana wakaf bukan hanya yang ada dalam hukum islam tetapi menerapkan juga aturan hukum positif, serta peran serta semua pihak untuk aktif dalam melakukan pensertifikatan tanah wakaf harus  dilakukan. Kata Kunci : Wakaf, Hukum Islam, Hukum Positif, Pendaftaran
PROSEDUR PENERBITAN SERTIFIKAT ELEKTRONIK SEBAGAI BUKTI AUTENTIK PENGUASAAN HAK ATAS TANAH: PROCEDURE FOR ISSUANCE OF ELECTRONIC CERTIFICATES AS AUTHENTIC EVIDENCE AUTHORIZATION OF LAND Arif Rahman Hakim; MUAMAR ALAY IDRUS
JURIDICA : Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gunung Rinjani Vol. 3 No. 1 (2021): Kolaborasi Hukum dan Era Digitaliasasi
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gunung Rinjani

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46601/juridica.v3i1.191

Abstract

That this thesis examines the juridical review of the procedure of issuing Electronic Certificates as authentic evidence of land rights mastery with the formulation of the problem, namely, how the land registration procedure to obtain an Electronic Certificate and how the power of Electronic certificates as authentic proof of land rights mastery. The purpose of this study was to find out and analyze how the procedure of issuing Electronic Certificates as authentic proof of land rights mastery. The benefits and usefulness of this research are theoretical benefits and practical benefits, using normative research methods. This research is normative research. By analyzing or reviewing a valid and competent Regulation to be used as a basis for problem-solving. The object of Sripsi's research is about the Procedure of issuing Electronic Seritifikat as authentic evidence of land rights mastery with several library reviews including a review of land rights, a review of land registration, a review of Certificates, then a review of Proof. While the source of legal materials used is divided into two, namely primary and secondary legal materials, in this thesis research the collection of legal materials by means of literature studies is by analyzing laws and regulations and is expected to be normative research. Based on the results of the study, the procedure of issuing Electronic Seritifikat should refer to Government Regulation No. 24 of 1997 concerning land registration for land that has not been registered and has not had physical and juridical evidence in accordance with articles 11 and 12. Then to get an Electronic Certificate or the change of analog certificate into an Electronic certificate refers to the Regulation of the Minister of Spatial Affairs of the head of the National Land Agency No. 1 of 2021 on Electronic Certificates, namely article 2, the next issued the implementing rules are government Regulation No. 18 of 2021 on management rights, land rights, flat units and land registration, namely article 84, Furthermore, the power of Electronic Certificates as authentic proof of land rights is included in the expansion of the letter proof tool, namely in article 1866 of the civil code and certificate of land rights can be canceled to its authenticity if it does not meet the elements of an authentic deed in accordance with the provisions of article 1868 of the civil code and further canceled if after 5 years of issuance of a Seritifkat there are those who feel objected can make a lawsuit to the office of the National Land Agency or to the court in accordance with article 32 paragraph (2) of Government Regulation No. 24 of 1997 concerning land registration.
Reconstructing Corporate Environmental Criminal Liability in Indonesia: Harmonizing Substantive Environmental Law and the 2025 Criminal Procedure Code Muammar Alay Idrus
KRTHA BHAYANGKARA Vol. 20 No. 1 (2026): KRTHA BHAYANGKARA: APRIL 2026
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31599/krtha.v20i1.5063

Abstract

This study examines the effectiveness of corporate punishment in environmental crime cases in Indonesia amid implementation deficits and procedural fragmentation by analyzing the harmonization between substantive environmental criminal law and corporate criminal procedure. It assesses the application of corporate criminal liability under Law Number 32 of 2009, evaluates sentencing practices, and formulates an integrated model of corporate environmental punishment following the 2025 Criminal Procedure Code. Using normative legal research with a statutory approach and supported by a systematic literature review, the study finds that although corporations are formally recognized as subjects of environmental criminal law, judicial practice is dominated by monetary fines, while additional sanctions and environmental restoration measures are rarely imposed. This indicates an implementation deficit rather than normative inconsistency, weakening deterrence and allowing sanctions to be treated as a business cost. The study argues that Chapter XVIII of the 2025 Criminal Procedure Code provides a clearer procedural framework for prosecution, sentencing, and environmental restoration, enabling structural–procedural harmonization. It proposes an integrated model aligning substantive norms with procedural enforcement and concludes that the core issue lies in procedural fragmentation and weak implementation.