Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Substantive Justice International Journal of Law ILTEK : Jurnal Teknologi
Amiruddin Amiruddin
Universitas Islam Makassar
Computer Science & IT Control & Systems Engineering Engineering Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mechanical Engineering

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
ANALISA PEMBANGKIT TENAGA LISTRIK DENGAN TENAGA UAP DI PLTU Hammada Abbas; Jamaluddin Jamaluddin; Muhammad Arif; Amiruddin Amiruddin
JURNAL ILTEK Vol 14, No 01 (2019): ILTEK : Jurnal Teknologi
Publisher : Fakultas Teknik Universitas Islam Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (301.383 KB) | DOI: 10.47398/iltek.v14i01.362

Abstract

Pembangkit Listrik Tenaga Uap (PLTU) adalah pembangkit yang mengandalkan energi kinetik dari uap untuk menghasilkan energi listrik. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui daya yang di bangkitkan oleh turbin dan energi kalor yang di butuhkan oleh boiler. Metode penelitian yang dilakukan adalah metode observasi dan pengelompokan sumber data yang diperlukan seperti kondisi dan pola produksi steam pada boiler, turbin dan mengidentifikasi data-data tersebut kemdian dilakukan perhitungan pada data yang ada. Hasil penelitian boiler menunjukan SUPERHEATED STEAM PRESSURE pada hari pertama sebesar 9.652 Mpa dan SUPERHEATED STEAM TEMP sebesar 515.367 C serta daya maksimum yang dibangkitkan turbin sebesar 110.758 MW. Hasil perhitungan menunjukan daya maksimum turbin yang di bangkitkan selama satu jam adalah 246,526 MW sedangkan pada hari pertama panas spesifik yang di butuhkan boiler (qboiler) adalah sebesar 3.212,2 KJ/kg. Kesimpulan besar daya maksimum yang di bangkitkan oleh turbin uap pada PLTU selama seminggu adalah 241,424 MW sedangkan kapasitas energi kalor (Qboiler) yang dihasilkan oleh boiler adalah 278,576 MW.
Judicial Activism in Regional Head Election Dispute: The Practice and Consistency of The Indonesian Constitutional Court Amiruddin Amiruddin; Rizki Ramadani
Susbtantive Justice International Journal of Law Vol 6 No 1 (2023): Substantive Justice International Journal of Law
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Muslim Indonesia, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56087/substantivejustice.v6i1.230

Abstract

The Constitutional Court's approach towards regional head election disputes is regarded as quite progressive and illustrates the growing trend of judicial activism. This article attempts to analyze the practice of activism by the Constitutional Court in the context of regional head election disputes and assess its consistency in simultaneous elections. This study uses a conceptual, statutory and case approach in analyzing several regional head election dispute decisions in 2020. The activism of the Constitutional Court in the context of regional head election disputes is at least practiced by judges through three things: first, the determination taken by the Constitutional Court to decide on re-voting and re-counting of votes; second, the willingness of the Court to consider election offenses that are structured, massive, and systematic; and third, the courage of judges to disqualify regional head candidates as well as determine the winner to provide legal certainty. This practice of activism is still being consistently pursued by judges in the 2020 simultaneous regional head elections. Even so, there is a tendency that structured, systematic and massive violations are not the main reason for terminating the election results, and even tend to be complicated by judges who demand more significant evidence. This condition will cause the burden of proving the structured, systematic and massive offenses to be much heavier in the future. This seems to be contradictory to previous decisions of the Constitutional Court which were known to prioritize substantive justice.
Co-Authors Hammada Abbas Jamaluddin Jamaluddin Muhammad Arif Rizki Ramadani