Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Indonesian Journal of Social and Educational Studies HUMAN: South Asian Journal of Social Studies
Chris Abakare
Nnamdi Azikiwe University
Religion Humanities Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
A Critique of Deep Ecology Chris Abakare
Indonesian Journal of Social and Educational Studies Vol 2, No 1 (2021): Indonesian Journal of Social and Educational Studies
Publisher : Indonesian Journal of Social and Educational Studies

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (538.453 KB) | DOI: 10.35580/ijses.v2i1.22921

Abstract

Deep ecology, in its broad meaning, is used by Naess to refer to the broad ecocentric grass-root effort as contrasted with an anthropocentric approach to achieve an ecologically balanced future. Deep ecology embraces a deep approach by speaking about the intrinsic value of nature. In this connection, Naess advocates the principle of biospheric egalitarianism claiming equal moral worth of all beings, human and non-human alike. It is an approach of realising man’s position in the larger web of things. In practice, deep ecology is a movement which is concerned with the solution of grass-root social and political problems for an ecologically sustainable future. In principle, it upholds a holistic view of nature transcending the narrow ego-centric self that undertakes a thesis of Self-realization or identifying oneself with the greater ecological-Self. This work is a critical study of the deep ecology philosophy. The basic focus of this work, centres around the debate among the different schools of environmental philosophy, particularly, the criticism of deep ecology by social ecology.
Kant’s Theory of Virtues and Doctrine of Rights Sanctioning Fair Business and Trade Chris Abakare
HUMAN: South Asian Journal of Social Studies Vol 1, No 2 (2021): Human: South Asean Journal of Social Studies
Publisher : HUMAN: South Asian Journal of Social Studies

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (551.694 KB) | DOI: 10.26858/human.v1i2.22917

Abstract

Trade and business have played a pivotal role in shaping the development of world’s economy and every home and individual is affected by it. The growth of every nation is largely controlled by its inherent capacity for smooth trade and business. Trade and Business contribute to the overall development of a nation by making a significant contribution in terms of tax revenues and providing lucrative employment. Thus, Trade and Business being such an important area of human concern cannot be given a free hand to govern and control the society. Business and trade are the potential forces of such a society endorsing peace and prosperity of every citizen provided they are properly steered. Therefore there is a need for a yardstick which would determine the worth and the depth of the business and trade policies. And, this yard-stick or standard by which we measure the reliability of the business and trade policies should be based on a solid philosophy. Due to the above, this research attempt to pinpoint the philosophy of Immanuel Kant, which I seek to unearth and recommend to the world of business and trade for the resolution of ethical conflicts.
Co-Authors