Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Al-Ahkam: Jurnal Ilmu Syari'ah dan Hukum Jurnal SMART (Studi Masyarakat, Religi, dan Tradisi) Al-Ahkam: Jurnal Ilmu Syari'ah dan Hukum
Farkhan Farkhan
UIN Raden Mas Said Surakarta
Religion Arts Humanities Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Studi Komparatif Fikih Bencana Muhammadiyah dan Nahdlatul Ulama Farkhan Farkhan; Kamsi Kamsi; Asmuni Asmuni
Al-Ahkam Jurnal Ilmu Syari’ah dan Hukum Vol. 5 No. 2 (2020): Al-Ahkam: Jurnal Ilmu Syari'ah dan Hukum
Publisher : IAIN Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22515/alahkam.v5i2.3281

Abstract

The background of the study is the existence of Fiqh Muhammadiyah and Fiqh Nahdlatul Ulama in coping with disaster, in response to the phenomenon of disasters happened in Indonesia, which has taken many victims and caused various losses. Muhammadiyah and Nahdlatul Ulama are two largest Islamic community organizations in this country, so the way on managing the society is always interesting to study, including FIQH (ISLAMIC JURISPRUDENCE) of coping the disaster. Based on the reasons above, the backgrounds of the study are how do muhammadiyah and nahdhatul ulama apply their fiqh (islamic jurisprudence) to cope with disaster? and why do they apply their fiqh? This study is library research using qualitative design and comparing between the two fiqhs from both Muhammadiyah and Nahdatul ulama. The researcher applies Philosophical approaches, through the term epistemilogi bayani, burhani dan irfani as instruments to clarify the content of both fiqhs to find the answer for both research problems above. The findings are the guideline and methodhology used both Muhammadiyah and Nahdatul ulama covered in both fiqhs; there are several differences on the Basic conceptions related to beliefs and Aqida; ethical and moral formulations and practical things. Muhammadiyah Fiqh explained in details regarding with practical procedures and steps of worship in coping with disaster, while Nahdlatul Ulama Fiqh explained only practical guidelines in coping with disaster. The other finding is related to the triple epistimology. The point of bayani on both fiqhs are relatively similar, same level and size. The point of burhani on Muhammadiyah fiqh gave deeper understanding than Nahdlatul Ulama fiqh. And the point of irfani neither muhammadiyah nor Nahdlatul Ulama seem to use it. The fact of the differences refers to the basic methodology from both organizations; Muhammadiyah refers from verse and hadith, while Nahdlatul Ulama refers from aqwal ulama, although both of them refer to the verse, hadith and the decree of classical ulama (preachers)
PEMETAAN TEMA DAN POLA PENULISAN MANUSKRIP HADIS DI INDONESIA Ismail Yahya; Farkhan Farkhan
Jurnal SMART (Studi Masyarakat, Religi, dan Tradisi) Vol 5, No 1 (2019): Jurnal SMaRT Studi Masyarakat, Religi, dan Tradisi
Publisher : Balai Penelitian dan Pengembangan Agama Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (563.32 KB) | DOI: 10.18784/smart.v5i1.709

Abstract

Although Hadith is one of the main sources of Islamic teachings but the science of Hadith has received less attention from scholars who concern on Islamic studies in Islamic Higher Education Institutions (PTKI) in Indonesia. This can be seen from the lack of research on Hadith manuscripts. This study is intended to fill the gap and aims at mapping the theme and pattern of writing of Hadith manuscripts founded in the collection of the National Library of Republic of Indonesia. Of the 32 Hadith manuscripts, only 11 have been studied. The method used refers to the codicology and theory of ilmu Fahrah al-Ḥadīṡ. The findings of this study are that 1) it is assumed, from the theme mapping, that those Hadith manuscripts are summaries of the main Hadith books, whose content is related to the problem of the occult, the Prophet’s moral (akhlaq), virtues of deeds (fadhilat al-a’mal), encouragement of good (targhib) and discouragement of evil (tarhib). Another finding is 2) in terms of the writing pattern of Hadith, based on the knowledge of Fahrah al-Ḥadīṡ, there are 8 patterns of writing of the Hadith based on Hadith manuscripts examined, namely the writing pattern of al-Muʻjam, Arbaʻīnāt, Taʻāliq, Ṡulāsiyyāt, Takhrīj, al-Mukhtaṣarāt, Syaraḥ Ḥadīṡ, and Ḥadīṡ Masyḥūr.
Studi Komparatif Fikih Bencana Muhammadiyah dan Nahdlatul Ulama Farkhan Farkhan; Kamsi Kamsi; Asmuni Asmuni
Al-Ahkam: Jurnal Ilmu Syari’ah dan Hukum Vol. 5 No. 2 (2020): Al-Ahkam: Jurnal Ilmu Syari'ah dan Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah, Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Mas Said Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22515/alahkam.v5i2.3281

Abstract

The background of the study is the existence of Fiqh Muhammadiyah and Fiqh Nahdlatul Ulama in coping with disaster, in response to the phenomenon of disasters happened in Indonesia, which has taken many victims and caused various losses. Muhammadiyah and Nahdlatul Ulama are two largest Islamic community organizations in this country, so the way on managing the society is always interesting to study, including FIQH (ISLAMIC JURISPRUDENCE) of coping the disaster. Based on the reasons above, the backgrounds of the study are how do muhammadiyah and nahdhatul ulama apply their fiqh (islamic jurisprudence) to cope with disaster? and why do they apply their fiqh? This study is library research using qualitative design and comparing between the two fiqhs from both Muhammadiyah and Nahdatul ulama. The researcher applies Philosophical approaches, through the term epistemilogi bayani, burhani dan irfani as instruments to clarify the content of both fiqhs to find the answer for both research problems above. The findings are the guideline and methodhology used both Muhammadiyah and Nahdatul ulama covered in both fiqhs; there are several differences on the Basic conceptions related to beliefs and Aqida; ethical and moral formulations and practical things. Muhammadiyah Fiqh explained in details regarding with practical procedures and steps of worship in coping with disaster, while Nahdlatul Ulama Fiqh explained only practical guidelines in coping with disaster. The other finding is related to the triple epistimology. The point of bayani on both fiqhs are relatively similar, same level and size. The point of burhani on Muhammadiyah fiqh gave deeper understanding than Nahdlatul Ulama fiqh. And the point of irfani neither muhammadiyah nor Nahdlatul Ulama seem to use it. The fact of the differences refers to the basic methodology from both organizations; Muhammadiyah refers from verse and hadith, while Nahdlatul Ulama refers from aqwal ulama, although both of them refer to the verse, hadith and the decree of classical ulama (preachers)
Co-Authors Asmuni Asmuni Ismail Yahya Kamsi Kamsi