Desi Yunita Putri
Universitas PGRI Banyuwangi

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Analysis of Illegal Investment in the Perspektive of Pancasila : Analisis Hukum Investasi Bodong dalam Perspektif Pancasila Arie Ramadhani; Desi Yunita Putri; Roudhotul Jannah
Santhet: (Jurnal Sejarah, Pendidikan Dan Humaniora) Vol 7 No 2 (2023): Santhet : Jurnal Sejarah, Pendidikan dan Humaniora
Publisher : Proram studi pendidikan Sejarah Fakultas Keguruan Dan Ilmu Pendidikan Universaitas PGRI Banyuwangi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36526/santhet.v7i2.2972

Abstract

This study aims to find out the contract or investment cooperation agreement made by partners and PT. IMB is legally valid, to find out the agreement between PT. MIB with partners is an investment agreement, to find out the business run by PT. MIB with partners is an illegal investment to know PT. IMB commits fraud under the guise of investing in victims as partners, to find out about illegal investment laws from the perspective of Pancasila. In this study, researchers used field research methods and used a qualitative approach. The results of the research found that the cooperation agreement entered into by partners and PT.IMB was not legally valid. The agreement between PT.MIB and partners is an investment agreement but there are some irregularities, PT. IMB commits fraud under the guise of investment. Conclusion The agreement between PT. MIB and partners is an investment agreement even though there are some irregularities, but PT. MIB is not competent at law because it does not have permission to accept investment from investors, both domestic and foreign. If seen from the characteristics of fraudulent investment, PT. MIB is running an illegal investment business.
LITERATURE REVIEW OF BULLYING ASSESSMENT : A CRITICAL REVIEW OF THE INVENTORY OF BULLYING SCALE IN SCHOOLS: KAJIAN LITERATUR ASSESSMENT BULLYING: TINJAUAN KRITIS TERHADAP INVENTORI SKALA BULLYING DI SEKOLAH Ratna Wulandari; Desi Yunita Putri
SOSIOEDUKASI Vol 12 No 2 (2023): SOSIOEDUKASI : JURNAL ILMIAH ILMU PENDIDIKAN DAN SOSIAL
Publisher : Fakultas Keguruan Dan Ilmu Pendidikan Universaitas PGRI Banyuwangi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36526/sosioedukasi.v12i2.3044

Abstract

Bullying is still a serious problem in Indonesia. The impact of bullying on its victims is very real. Meanwhile, on average, educators, especially guidance counselors, education staff, and parents only become aware of bullying after it has happened. If early detection efforts are made, the case can be anticipated earlier. This is because there are no measurement instruments that can assist the counseling teacher in detecting cases of bullying that occur easily and on a large scale. So it is necessary to digitize the bullying scale instrument. Instruments in the form of self-reports are the most commonly used method in collecting data to assess bullying phenomena. This method has several advantages. The Olweus Bully/Victim Questionnaire (OBVQ) is one of the most widely used instruments to measure the prevalence of bullying worldwide. This questionnaire provides students with a clear definition of bullying that includes three important characteristics: (1) intent to harm others; (2) repetitive behavior; and (3) the power imbalance between victims and perpetrators. The OBVQ can be adapted into a bullying scale inventory that is appropriate to the conditions and culture in Indonesia so that it can be used to detect bullying phenomena that occur in Indonesian youth, especially at school.
ENTRAPMENT LEADING TO TESTILYING BY POLICE IN NARCOTICS CASES: Penjebakan (Entrapment) Berujung Pada Kesaksian Bohong (Testilying) Oleh Polisi Pada Kasus Narkotika Arie Ramadhani; Desi Yunita Putri
SOSIOEDUKASI Vol 14 No 1 (2025): SOSIOEDUKASI : JURNAL ILMIAH ILMU PENDIDIKAN DAN SOSIAL
Publisher : Fakultas Keguruan Dan Ilmu Pendidikan Universaitas PGRI Banyuwangi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36526/sosioedukasi.v14i1.5688

Abstract

The harshness of the war on narcotics ironically did not bring significant improvements to reduce the number of illicit drug trafficking or the level of drug use or abuse. In addition, the war on narcotics also caused law enforcement efforts in narcotics cases to be far from compliance with fair trial norms. The problems raised from this study regarding the factors causing police officers to commit entrapment, Engineering and Deceptive Techniques which ended in giving false testimony (Testilying) in Court in narcotics cases, how the Supreme Court Judge's decision is reviewed from moral principles. The type of research used is pure normative legal research, namely research that focuses on studying secondary legal materials and then analyzed using the logic of legal science. The results of this study are that the three investigative techniques in the form of entrapment, engineering and deceptive techniques are techniques that are not allowed in the Criminal Justice System in Indonesia, because this technique will also end in police testilying. The implementation of this technique occurs due to several factors, including public support for this practice, the high target of arrests by the police in narcotics cases and the performance of the police from the arrest indicator so that the war on drugs becomes the wrong target.