Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Journal of Innovation and Community Engagement Kultura: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora
Indah Aprilia
Universitas Indonesia
Arts Humanities Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Information Dissemination on Regulation of Supreme Court Number 1 Year 2016 Regarding Mediation in the Village of Maleber Bandung Moody R. Syailendra; Indah Aprilia; Anggraeni Sari Gunawan; Shrishti Shrishti
Journal of Innovation and Community Engagement Vol. 3 No. 4 (2022)
Publisher : Fakultas Teknik Universitas Kristen Maranatha

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28932/ice.v3i4.4097

Abstract

As mentioned by article 1 point 1 in Regulation of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1 of 2016, mediation is an alternative resort to solve disputes through negotiation used to reach a consensus in the presence of a mediator. Mediation as an alternative dispute resolution reflects the Fourth Precept of Pancasila as the nation's character which implies resolving disputes through deliberation. Prioritizing communication is a form of deliberation carried out with the purpose of re-agreements, where there will be a possibility to improve the relationship between the parties. Resolving conflicts through mediation is an attempt to end complicated issues through a process that is time-saving and relatively cheap in providing win-win solutions. In Indonesia, the existence of mediation is based on the Regulation of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia No. 1 of 2016. Mediation has also been set as a mandatory process in the path of resolving disputes in the civil court. The method of information dissemination is carried out to create awareness regarding the new law enforced, which includes lectures and interaction. The research team in collaboration with the Maleber Village held an information dissemination activity based on the Supreme Court Regulation Number 1 of 2016 concerning Mediation. This activity would be very useful for all the parties facing conflicts as well as advisors or for third parties (mediators), such as the village apparatus, families, traditional leaders, community leaders, and other parties who are becoming completely aware of the negotiation and mediation.
ANALISIS PERKEMBANGAN KASUS KORUPSI DAN PERAN KOMISI PEMBERANTASAN KORUPSI DALAM PEMBERANTASAN KASUS KORUPSI DI INDONESIA SERTA STUDI KASUS FIRLI BAHURI Charyza Najma Divania; Indah Aprilia; Nathan Egbert Latuheru; Reynaldi Arrayan Isa
Kultura: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Sosial, dan Humaniora Vol. 1 No. 3 (2023): Kultura: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Sosial, dan Humaniora
Publisher : Kultura: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Sosial, dan Humaniora

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.572349/kultura.v1i3.308

Abstract

Corruption has become a disease that continues to take root in the process of state administration. The feeling of greed for more power and wealth and the opportunity to become one of the factors of corruption is still carried out. Apart from that, the lack of strong supervision from supervisory institutions and the lack of strong sanctions given to perpetrators of corruption increasingly embolden them to choose this path. In the eradication process, state institutions have been established, such as the Prosecutor's Office and the Police. However, due to the lack of power in resolving the corruption cases that occurred, an independent state institution to eradicate corruption was formed through Law Number 30 of 2003, commonly known as the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK). As a new institution, the Corruption Eradication Committee does not have a truly independent task in the process of eradicating corruption. The Corruption Eradication Committee (KPK) must continue to cooperate with the Prosecutor's Office and the Police to eradicate corruption cases. This collaboration is intended to create a more efficient and effective corruption eradication process. As an independent institution, the KPK is also required not to involve the interests of any institution in carrying out its duties, including the interests of its own institution.
Co-Authors Anggraeni Sari Gunawan Charyza Najma Divania Moody Rizqy Syailendra Putra Nathan Egbert Latuheru Reynaldi Arrayan Isa Shrishti Shrishti