Ram Gopal
Department of Electronics & Communication Engineering, Institute of Technology & Management, Gorakhpur, India

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Non-Body Contact Thermometer with Voice Output Via Wireless Communication Moch Prastawa Assalim Tetra Putra; Levana Forra Wakidi; Tri Bowo Indrato; Ram Gopal; Anita Nurliana
Jurnal Teknokes Vol 15 No 2 (2022): June
Publisher : Jurusan Teknik Elektromedik, POLTEKKES KEMENKES Surabaya, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35882/jteknokes.v15i2.245

Abstract

Currently, thermometer has been widely used by the public. In general, thermometers are designed for people who have normal physical conditions, especially in the ability to see. Disabled people, especially blind people, will find it difficult to use the existing thermometer, especially with the current pandemic situation, which is likely to spread COVID-19 quickly. In connection with this problem, non-contact body temperature measurement is needed with sound output and a wireless system so that there is less possibility of exposure to disease. Therefore, this study describes a non-body contact thermometer with sound output via wireless. The purpose of this study concludes that Non-Body Contact Thermometers can be made with Voice Output Via Wireless to determine normal or hyper and hypo human body temperatures. Thus, this thermometer make it easier for those who have limitations to see and reduce exposure to covid-19 between patients and users. The method in this study employed MLX90614 as a sensor whose output is in the form of digital data, HC-SR04 as a trigger on the MLX90614 sensor, and DF player as a reader on data that have been recorded via Google and stored on the SD card, and XBEE module as transceivers of data to pc. Temperature testing was further conducted by comparing the module with a standard tool, that is a digital thermometer. The error obtained from the module at normal temperature is 0.98%, while the smallest error is 0.1%. Furthermore, in terms of the hypo temperature, the largest error is 1.80%, while the smallest error is 0.42%. Last, at hyper temperature, the largest error is 1.75%, while the smallest error is 0.10%.
Analysis of Drop Sensor Accuracy in Central Infusion Peristaltic Monitoring Based on Computer Using Wireless Communication HC-11 Syaifudin Syaifudin; Triana Rahmawati; Siti Rohmatul Jannah; Sandeep Kumar Gupta; Ram Gopal
Indonesian Journal of Electronics, Electromedical Engineering, and Medical Informatics Vol 4 No 2 (2022): May
Publisher : Department of electromedical engineering, Health Polytechnic of Surabaya, Ministry of Health Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35882/ijeeemi.v4i2.2

Abstract

In some hospitals, the infusion is still done manually, where medical personnel observe the liquid droplets directly and then control the rate using a mechanical resistor (clamp). This method is certainly far from accurate. An infusion pump is a medical aid that functions to control and ensure the correct dose of infusion fluid given to patients treated. The purpose of this study was to analyze the accuracy of the infrared photodiode as a drop sensor based on the readings of the infusion pump monitoring system. This module consists of a photodiode infrared drop sensor module, a comparator circuit, a monostable circuit, a stepper motor, an L298N motor driver, and an ATmega328 microcontroller. The droplets were detected by an infrared photodiode sensor, then compared with a comparator and monostable circuit as an oscillator developer, and then the flow rate and residual volume readings were generated by the ATmega328 microcontroller. Next, this data has sent to the computer via the HC-11 wireless. The results of the flowrate module measurement show the highest error value of 3% at the 30 ml/hour setting and the lowest error value of 2.5% at the 60 ml/hour setting. Meanwhile, the results of the flow rate measurement using an infusion device analyzer obtained the highest error value of 4% at the setting of 30 ml/hour and 60 ml/hour, and the lowest error value of 0.8% at the setting of 100 ml/hour. Monitoring the infusion pump was designed centrally to facilitate the nurse's task in monitoring the infusion dose given to the patient accurately. Based on this research, the accuracy of the infrared sensor and photodiode is very good by looking at the existing error rate.