Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

Journalist Philosophy: Binding the Norms of Islamic Law Datuk Imam Marzuki; Nasrillah; Mhd. Hasbi
Konfrontasi: Jurnal Kultural, Ekonomi dan Perubahan Sosial Vol 9 No 2 (2022): Konfrontasi, June
Publisher : Budapest International Research and Critics University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33258/konfrontasi2.v9i2.208

Abstract

Journalism is related to diaries that are published to the public and published in a certain way. Muslim journalism also breathes prophetic journalism, a form of journalism that not only reports news and problems in a complete, clear, honest, and actual way, but also provides interpretations and directions for change. ,transformation, based on the ethical and prophetic ideals of Islam. He became a journalism that consciously and responsibly contained the values and love of Islam. The philosophy of a journalist who is Muslim, ideally as a continuation of the Prophet's treatise is seen as an important study in today's information age. This is based on the view that the journalist is a teacher from the information society. then becomes important information that is absorbed by the public through the mass media. Because of his strategic position, he can become a benevolent spreader in the community through his mass media.
Gratification In Promotion In View Of The Law Mhd. Hasbi
Legalpreneur Journal Volume 2, No. 1 October 2023
Publisher : Universitas Dharmawangsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46576/lpj.v2i1.3721

Abstract

AbstractMany cases of corruption by state officials are increasingly systematic and widespread, one of which is the existence of gratification. Therefore, gratuity should have its own meaning inthe law if the definition or understanding of gratuity has not been included in the generalprovisions, it will be very likely that there will be ambiguity in the interpretation of thecriminal act of gratuity. In Article 12 B Of The Corruption Eradication Act No. 20 of 2001that a gift that is related to his position and contrary to his obligations or duties isconsidered an act that has an indication of gratuity. Legal norms in this article raises theambiguity of the norm (Vague Norm), the juridical indication that someone has done thecrime of gratuity is not clear, because the definition of gratuity itself is not written in thelegislation so that Article 12 B still needs to be touched to be seen clearly.Keywords: Legal, Law, Gratification
KELEMAHAN REGULASI TINDAK PIDANA PEMILU DALAM UPAYA MENCEGAH DAN MENANGGULANGI PRAKTIK POLITIK UANG (MONEY POLITIC) Hasbi, Mhd.; Ali , Tengku Mabar
Judge : Jurnal Hukum Vol. 5 No. 02 (2024): Judge : Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Cattleya Darmaya Fortuna

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54209/judge.v5i02.611

Abstract

Pelaksanaan Pemilu yang bebas dan adil (free and fair) adalah suatu keniscayaan yang harus dilaksanakan bagi sebuah negara yang menyatakan diri sebagai negara yang demokrasi. Oleh karena itu, dibutuhkan adanya kebijakan hukum dalam upaya untuk mewujudkan pelaksanaan Pemilu yang bebas dan adil, utamanya untuk mengatasi berbagai pelanggaran yang terjadi dalam penyelenggaraan Pemilu. Regulasi tindak pidana Pemilu dan Sanksi tindak pidana dalam Undang-Undang Pemilu serta penegakan hukumnya dirasakan belum maksimal dan mampu mewujudkan pemilihan umum yang jujur dan adil. Penelitian ini bertujuan untu menganalisis kelemahan Undang-Undang Pemilu sehingga penegakan hukum terhadap tindak pidana Pemilu lebih berkepastian hukum. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini dengan menggunakan pendekatan yuridis normatif dengan paradigma yang digunakan paradigma konstruktifisme. Hasil pembahasan diperoleh bahwa Kelemahan regulasi tindak pidana saat ini, menunjukkan bahwa sistem sanksi pidana dalam pasal-pasal dalam Undang-Undang Pemilu dirumuskan dalam bentuk sanksi maksimal, yang dalam penerapannya tidak menimbulkan efek jera bagi pelaku dan memiliki daya guna sebagai pencegahan umum (general preventif) untuk mencegah terjadinya tindak pidana Pemilu. Secara kelembagaan, kedudukan Sentra Gakkumdu masih terdapat kekaburan norma dalam pelaksanaannya, sehingga fungsi dari Sentra Gakkumdu belum berjalan secara maksimal. Kemudian budaya hukum masyarakat, utamanya penegak hukum belum menunjukkan profesionalisme kerja, yang memiliki integritas dalam menjalankan tugas dan fungsinya.
Pertimbangan Hukum Hakim Dalam Menetapkan Suatu Putusan di Persidangan Perkara Pidana Lubis, Andi Hakim; Hasbi, Mhd.
Madani: Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Vol 1, No 12 (2024): Madani, Vol. 1 No. 12 2024
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.10441033

Abstract

One of the important aspects of a judge's decision in judicial power is the judge's consideration in giving the severity of a criminal sentence. The judge's consideration can be interpreted as an opinion about the good or bad of a matter in order to provide a decision or decision that is sentenced by a judge at the supreme court and judges at the lower judicial bodies as outlined by the judge in his decision. The judge's considerations are the thoughts or opinions of the judge in making a decision by looking at things that can lighten or burden the offender. Every judge is obliged to submit written considerations or opinions on the case being examined and becomes an integral part of the decision. The type of research used in this dissertation is normative research. The essence of the judge's own decision is the crown, and the peak of the criminal case so that the judge in giving a criminal decision must pay attention to all aspects. In the judge's consideration, there are 3 (three) aspects that the judge considers, namely juridical, philosophical and sociological aspects.
Kebijakan Hukum Terhadap Perlindungan WHITSLE BLOWER Pada Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang Mhd. Hasbi
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik Vol. 3 No. 4 (2023): (JIHHP) Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik (Agustus 2023)
Publisher : Dinasti Review Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jihhp.v3i4.1978

Abstract

Law enforcement against money laundering crimes currently refers to the provisions of Law Number 8 of 2010 concerning Prevention and Eradication of Money Laundering Crimes (UU No. 8/2010 concerning PP-TPPU), which is the legal basis (umbrella law) for enforcers law in preventing and eradicating criminal acts of money laundering. Regarding reporting parties who are burdened with the obligation to report suspicious financial transactions to PPATK, this has been explicitly stipulated in the provisions of Article 17 of Law no. 8/2010 concerning PP-TPPU, where the parties consist of Financial Services Providers and Goods/Services Providers. There are inconsistencies in the formulation of the articles of Law no. 8/2010 concerning PP-TPPU and PP no. 43/2015 as an implementing regulation, will of course have implications for the legal certainty of protection for whistleblowers, which will have an impact on the implementation of reporting not being optimal and ultimately will also have an impact on efforts to prevent and eradicate money laundering crimes. This research is normative research. The research was carried out by researching the literature using a statute approach. The ideal regulation which is more legal and just, is to include several matters relating to whistleblowers in the Special Law on Whistleblowers or the revision of Law no. 31/2014 concerning PSK, namely: regarding information criteria, whistleblower rights, report substance, reporting system, technical protection and rewards for whistleblowers. Barriers to protection for whistleblowers of money laundering crimes, consisting of juridical factors and law enforcement factors . Juridical factors, protection of whistleblowers have not been clearly regulated in Law no. 31/2014 concerning prostitutes. Meanwhile, as a law enforcement factor, there are still differences in perception between law enforcers who are members of the criminal justice system and whistle blowers.